NASA's $10.9M AV Center Support Services Contract Awarded to Innovative Technologies, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,922,334 ($10.9M)
Contractor: Innovative Technologies, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2001-09-15
End Date: 2007-05-31
Contract Duration: 2,084 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: HQ AV CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20546
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $10.9 million to INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: HQ AV CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.9 million over 2084 days. 2. Awarded to Innovative Technologies, Inc. under full and open competition. 3. Focuses on office administrative services, potentially impacting operational efficiency. 4. No small business participation noted.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar administrative support contracts is difficult without more detailed service descriptions.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure may not always yield the most cost-effective outcome.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for administrative support services. The effectiveness of the competition in securing optimal value for money is a key consideration.
Public Impact
Ensures essential administrative functions at NASA's AV Center. Supports daily operations and program execution. Potential for improved efficiency through specialized support services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Lack of small business participation
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition
- Long-term contract duration
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Office Administrative Services, a common support function across government agencies. Spending benchmarks for such services vary widely based on scope and location.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not awarded to a small business, and there is no indication of small business subcontracting. This represents a missed opportunity for small business engagement.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is crucial for Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts to ensure costs are reasonable and allocable. NASA's internal controls and reporting mechanisms will be key to accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Office Administrative Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type may lead to higher costs.
- No small business participation noted.
- Limited detail on specific services provided.
- Long contract duration increases exposure to changing needs.
Tags
office-administrative-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, dc, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $10.9 million to INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. HQ AV CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2001-09-15. End: 2007-05-31.
What specific administrative services are included in this contract, and how do they align with NASA's core mission objectives?
The contract covers office administrative services, which likely include tasks such as record management, scheduling, communication support, and general office operations. While essential for smooth functioning, the direct alignment with NASA's core mission objectives like space exploration and scientific research would depend on the specific nature and criticality of these administrative functions.
What are the potential risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract for administrative services, and how are they mitigated?
The primary risk of a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract is the potential for cost overruns, as the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee. Mitigation strategies include robust oversight, detailed cost tracking, clear performance metrics, and defined ceilings to prevent uncontrolled spending. NASA's procurement and contracting officers must actively manage these aspects.
How does the lack of small business participation impact the overall value and effectiveness of this procurement?
The absence of small business participation means potential benefits like innovation, specialized expertise, and economic impact for smaller firms are not realized. While full and open competition aims for the best value, excluding small businesses might limit the pool of potential offerors and potentially overlook cost-effective solutions they might provide. It also misses opportunities for socioeconomic goals.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Office Administrative Services › Office Administrative Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ALTERNATIVE SOURCES
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Address: 4115 PLEASANT VALLEY RD, CHANTILLY, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,922,334
Exercised Options: $10,922,334
Current Obligation: $10,922,334
Timeline
Start Date: 2001-09-15
Current End Date: 2007-05-31
Potential End Date: 2007-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-02-22
More Contracts from Innovative Technologies, Inc.
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →