Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab receives $89.6M for missile defense R&D, with a sole-source contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $89,623,003 ($89.6M)
Contractor: THE Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-10-30
End Date: 2026-08-14
Contract Duration: 2,845 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.5K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: ENGINEERING AND TECH SUPPORT RDTE FUNDS
Place of Performance
Location: LAUREL, HOWARD County, MARYLAND, 20723
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $89.6 million to THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC for work described as: ENGINEERING AND TECH SUPPORT RDTE FUNDS Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single entity, raising questions about competitive pricing. 2. Significant investment in research and development for critical defense systems. 3. Long contract duration suggests a sustained need for specialized expertise. 4. Focus on advanced engineering and technology development for missile defense. 5. Potential for cost overruns given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure. 6. Contractor has a strong track record in defense research.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value is substantial, reflecting the complexity of missile defense R&D. However, without competitive bidding, it's difficult to benchmark the pricing against market rates or alternative providers. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure allows for cost reimbursement plus a fixed fee, which can incentivize cost control but also carries the risk of cost escalation if not closely monitored. The total award value of $89.6 million over nearly 8 years indicates a significant investment, but the value-for-money proposition is inherently less transparent due to the lack of competition.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities or when there is an urgent need that cannot be met through a competitive process. The lack of competition means that price discovery through market forces was bypassed, potentially leading to higher costs for the government compared to a competed contract. The justification for sole-source awards often centers on specialized knowledge or existing infrastructure.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive pressure to drive down costs. The government relies on the contractor's good faith and robust internal controls to ensure fair pricing.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Missile Defense Agency, which will receive advanced research and development services. The contract supports the development of technologies crucial for national security and missile defense. Geographic impact is primarily centered in Maryland, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include the employment of highly skilled scientists, engineers, and technical personnel.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition, potentially increasing costs for taxpayers.
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
- Long contract duration (over 7 years) increases exposure to potential scope creep or evolving requirements.
- Lack of transparency in pricing due to non-competitive nature.
Positive Signals
- Contract awarded to a highly reputable research institution with a proven track record in defense.
- Focus on critical R&D for national security, addressing a vital government need.
- Long-term engagement allows for deep expertise development and sustained program support.
- The contractor's specialized knowledge is likely essential for the specific research objectives.
Sector Analysis
The Missile Defense Agency's R&D spending falls within the broader aerospace and defense sector, a market characterized by high barriers to entry, significant government reliance, and specialized technological requirements. This contract, focused on research and development (NAICS 541715), represents a segment of the defense industry dedicated to innovation and technological advancement. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the unique nature of missile defense R&D and the sole-source award, but overall R&D spending by the DoD is in the tens of billions annually.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, nor is there explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Given the specialized nature of the research and the sole-source award to a large, established institution, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses for specific support services, though this is not detailed in the provided data.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Missile Defense Agency and the Department of Defense's contracting and program management offices. Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, rigorous financial oversight and auditing by the government are crucial to ensure costs are reasonable and allocable. Transparency is limited by the sole-source nature, but contract performance reviews and milestone tracking would be standard oversight mechanisms. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Missile Defense Systems
- Research and Development Contracts
- Department of Defense Research Funding
- Advanced Technology Development
- Aerospace and Defense Sector Spending
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Long contract duration
Tags
defense, missile-defense-agency, research-and-development, sole-source, cost-plus-fixed-fee, johns-hopkins-university-applied-physics-laboratory-llc, maryland, large-contract, technology, engineering
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $89.6 million to THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC. ENGINEERING AND TECH SUPPORT RDTE FUNDS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Missile Defense Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $89.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-10-30. End: 2026-08-14.
What is the historical spending pattern for missile defense R&D with The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC?
Analyzing historical spending requires access to a broader dataset of federal contracts. However, the current award of approximately $89.6 million from October 2018 to August 2026 suggests a significant, long-term investment. The Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) is a well-known research center for the Department of Defense, particularly in areas like missile defense. Without specific historical contract data, it's difficult to quantify past spending trends, but APL's consistent involvement in defense R&D implies a recurring and substantial financial relationship with agencies like the Missile Defense Agency over many years. Future analysis would benefit from examining prior contracts awarded to APL for similar R&D efforts to identify trends in funding levels, contract types, and performance.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure compare to other contract types for R&D, and what are its implications for value?
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type reimburses the contractor for allowable costs incurred, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. For R&D, CPFF is often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined, allowing flexibility as research progresses. Compared to Fixed Price contracts, CPFF offers less price certainty for the government but can be more suitable for exploratory research where costs are unpredictable. Compared to Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), CPFF provides a fixed profit regardless of cost performance, potentially reducing the contractor's incentive to control costs compared to CPIF, which adjusts the fee based on performance against targets. The value proposition of CPFF hinges on effective government oversight to manage costs and ensure the fixed fee remains reasonable for the work performed.
What are the specific risks associated with a sole-source award for advanced R&D in missile defense?
The primary risk of a sole-source award for advanced R&D in missile defense is the lack of competitive pressure, which can lead to inflated pricing and reduced innovation. Without competing vendors, the government loses the opportunity to explore alternative technical approaches or benefit from potentially lower costs offered by other qualified contractors. There's also a risk of vendor lock-in, where the government becomes overly reliant on a single provider, making future transitions difficult or expensive. Furthermore, the justification for sole-sourcing must be robust; if the rationale is weak or becomes outdated, it could indicate poor strategic sourcing or missed opportunities for broader market engagement. Effective risk mitigation requires strong government negotiation skills and continuous monitoring of the contractor's performance and pricing.
What is the track record of The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC in delivering on defense R&D contracts?
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) has a long and distinguished track record in supporting the Department of Defense and other government agencies with advanced research and development, particularly in areas critical to national security such as missile defense, undersea warfare, and space systems. APL is known for its scientific and engineering expertise, often tackling complex, cutting-edge problems. While specific performance metrics for individual contracts are not publicly detailed here, APL's consistent selection for significant, often sole-source, defense R&D programs indicates a high level of trust and perceived capability by the government. Their history suggests a strong ability to deliver on challenging technical requirements, though like any large research organization, oversight and management are crucial to ensure optimal outcomes and value.
What are the potential implications of this contract on the broader missile defense technology landscape?
This contract, by funding advanced R&D at a leading institution like APL, contributes to the ongoing evolution of missile defense capabilities. The specific focus areas within the R&D will shape future technological advancements, potentially leading to breakthroughs in areas such as sensor technology, interceptor design, command and control systems, or artificial intelligence applications for threat assessment. As a sole-source award, it directs significant resources towards APL's specific research pathways, potentially influencing the direction of innovation in the field. While this ensures focused development, it also means that alternative technological approaches pursued by other entities might receive less direct government funding through this particular contract vehicle. The long-term impact depends on the success of the research and its subsequent integration into operational systems.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › C – National Defense R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: HQ014717R0041
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11100 JOHNS HOPKINS RD, LAUREL, MD, 20723
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $101,230,420
Exercised Options: $101,230,420
Current Obligation: $89,623,003
Actual Outlays: $2,516,221
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 2
Total Subaward Amount: $216,512
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HQ014718D0004
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-10-30
Current End Date: 2026-08-14
Potential End Date: 2026-08-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-19
More Contracts from THE Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC
- Dragonfly Extended Phase B Mission Under 80msfc20d0004 Aerospace Research, Development and Engineering Support (ardes) II — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Aerospace Research, Design, and Development Tasks for Nasa — $1.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Solar Probe Plus (SPP) Phase a Activities the Contractor Shall Perform the Work That IS Designated in Task Orders Issued by the Contracting Officer. the Overall Scope of Work to BE Performed Will Support ALL of Nasa's Mission Directorates. These Efforts CAN BE Characterized AS Aerospace Research, Development, and Engineering Support (ardes). the General Nature of the Tasks to BE Developed Will BE to Conduct Supporting Research and Advanced Technology Development Designed to Make Contributions to Space Science and Space Exploration and Assist Nasa in the Formulation and Execution of ITS Programs by Providing Nasa With Technical Advice, Studies, and Reports of Investigations. Efforts Undertaken by the Contractor, in the Performance of the Assigned Tasks, Which Include Technology Transfer, Partnering and Commercialization Activities, Shall Seek to Enhance the Value and Contribution of Technology to the Nation S Technological Competitiveness, Prosperity, Quality of Life, and Other National Priorities. Individual Task Orders Will Fall Within ONE of TWO Broad Categories: 1) Essential Research Capability of Space Systems Engineering, and Related Work in the Supporting Essential Research Capabilities of Systems Test and Evaluation, Information Technology, and Simulation, Modeling and Operations Analysis. Task Orders Within the Category of Essential Research Capabilities ARE Intended to Preserve the Nation S Capabilities to Perform Robotic Space Missions Over the Full Mission Life Cycle From Concept Formulation Through Mission Operations and Data Analysis. Nasa IS Contracting for Support in Several KEY Research, Engineering and Development Competencies That ARE Fundamental to the Performance of These Missions. 2) Other Aerospace Research, Development, and Engineering Support. Task Orders Within the Category of Other Aerospace Research, Development and Engineering Support ARE Intended to Include a Broad Base of Scientific and Technical Capabilities Relevant to Nasa Program Responsibilities and Assignments. Regardless of Category, Task Orders MAY BE Issued Related to Autonomous Deep-Space and Earth-Orbiting Spacecraft or Major Subsystems, Experiments, Instruments or Other Devices That MAY BE Carried AS Payloads on the Space Shuttle or on Other Spacecraft. Task Assignments Will Explicitly Describe a Broad Range of Hardware, Software, Systems Engineering, Scientific Analysis, and Management Efforts Including Program and Project Management and Administration — $894.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- SUN Earth Connection Living With a Star Program Letter Contract — $522.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe (imap) Phase CD — $400.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all THE Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)