DoD's $164M C2BMC contract to Lockheed Martin for CCMD integration and sustainment
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $163,991,188 ($164.0M)
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-12-15
End Date: 2019-11-15
Contract Duration: 700 days
Daily Burn Rate: $234.3K/day
Sector: Defense
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF THIS TASK ORDER (TO) PROVIDES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, COMBATANT COMMAND (CCMD) INTEGRATION, DEPLOYMENT, AND DISPOSAL OF THE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS (C2BMC) DEPLOYED SYSTEMS. THIS EFFORT IS A FOLLOW-ON AND CONTINUATION OF THE SUSTAINMENT AND WARFIGHTER INTEGRATION EFFORT PROVIDED UNDER HQ0147-12-D-0003, TASK ORDER 13 C2BMC SPIRAL 6.4 OPERATIONS&MAINTENANCE, LOGISTICS, WARFIGHTER INTEGRATION, AND DEPLOYMENT.
Place of Performance
Location: Colorado, 80921
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $164.0 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF THIS TASK ORDER (TO) PROVIDES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, COMBATANT COMMAND (CCMD) INTEGRATION, DEPLOYMENT, AND DISPOSAL OF THE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS (C2BMC) DEPLOYED SYSTEMS. THIS EFFORT IS A FOLLOW-ON AND C… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on critical command, control, battle management, and communications systems. 2. Follows a previous task order, indicating continuity of services for C2BMC. 3. Operations and maintenance are key components, suggesting a need for ongoing support. 4. Warfighter integration highlights the direct impact on military operational capabilities. 5. Deployment and disposal services indicate lifecycle management of complex systems. 6. Contractor has a significant role in sustaining a vital defense communication network.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $164 million over two years for complex C2BMC systems appears reasonable given the scope of operations, maintenance, and integration services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale defense IT and communication system sustainment contracts would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the follow-on nature suggests a degree of established pricing and performance from prior work.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
The competition level for this specific task order is not detailed in the provided data. As a follow-on effort to a previous task order under a larger contract, it could have been competed among a limited pool of qualified vendors or potentially awarded under a sole-source arrangement if circumstances warranted. The lack of explicit competition details makes it difficult to assess the impact on price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Without clear competition data, it's challenging to definitively state the impact on taxpayers. A more competitive process typically leads to better pricing, while a limited or sole-source award may result in higher costs.
Public Impact
US Combatant Commands benefit from reliable command and control systems. Services ensure the operational readiness and effectiveness of the C2BMC system. Supports the deployment and sustainment of critical defense communication infrastructure. Impacts military personnel who rely on these systems for mission execution. Ensures the ongoing functionality and integration of battle management capabilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if maintenance needs exceed projections.
- Risk of vendor lock-in due to specialized knowledge of C2BMC systems.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical operational systems.
Positive Signals
- Continuity of essential services for national security.
- Contractor's established relationship with the agency suggests familiarity with requirements.
- Focus on sustainment indicates a commitment to long-term system viability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense Information Technology and Communications sector, specifically supporting command and control systems. The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) is a key player in developing and sustaining advanced defense technologies. Spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need for interoperable and resilient communication networks to support global military operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve other large-scale sustainment and integration contracts for complex defense systems.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions or subcontracting goals for this task order. As a large contract likely awarded under a prime contractor like Lockheed Martin, the extent of small business involvement would depend on the prime's subcontracting plan and the availability of qualified small businesses for specific components of the work.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Missile Defense Agency, with potential involvement from the Department of Defense Inspector General's office. Accountability measures would be tied to performance metrics outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract awards databases and reporting requirements, though specific operational details may be classified.
Related Government Programs
- Command and Control Systems
- Battle Management Systems
- Integrated Logistics Support
- Defense Communications Networks
- Missile Defense Systems Sustainment
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns
- Risk of technology obsolescence
- Cybersecurity vulnerabilities
- Dependence on single contractor
- Lack of detailed competition data
Tags
defense, missile-defense-agency, command-and-control, battle-management, communications, operations-and-maintenance, logistics, lockheed-martin, delivery-order, information-technology, systems-integration, combatant-command
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $164.0 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. IGF::OT::IGF THIS TASK ORDER (TO) PROVIDES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, COMBATANT COMMAND (CCMD) INTEGRATION, DEPLOYMENT, AND DISPOSAL OF THE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS (C2BMC) DEPLOYED SYSTEMS. THIS EFFORT IS A FOLLOW-ON AND CONTINUATION OF THE SUSTAINMENT AND WARFIGHTER INTEGRATION EFFORT PROVIDED UNDER HQ0147-12-D-0003, TASK ORDER 13 C2BMC SPIRAL 6.4 OPERATIONS&MAINTENANCE, LOGISTICS, WARFIGHTER INTEGRATION, AND DEPLOYMENT.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Missile Defense Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $164.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-12-15. End: 2019-11-15.
What is the historical spending trend for C2BMC operations and maintenance, and how does this contract align with it?
The provided data indicates this task order is a follow-on effort to HQ0147-12-D-0003, Task Order 13. This suggests a pattern of ongoing investment in the C2BMC system's sustainment and evolution. To fully assess the trend, historical spending data for the base contract and previous task orders would be necessary. However, the fact that this is a continuation implies a consistent need and budget allocation for C2BMC operations and maintenance over several years. The current $164 million value over approximately two years should be compared against the total lifecycle cost of the C2BMC program to understand its proportion within the broader missile defense architecture.
How does the performance of Lockheed Martin on this contract compare to their performance on similar defense IT sustainment contracts?
Assessing Lockheed Martin's performance on this specific C2BMC contract requires access to performance reports, quality metrics, and any past performance evaluations. Without this granular data, a direct comparison is difficult. However, as a follow-on effort, it suggests a baseline level of satisfactory performance on the preceding task order. Generally, Lockheed Martin is a major defense contractor with extensive experience in complex systems integration and sustainment. Their track record across numerous large-scale defense programs indicates a capacity to manage such contracts, though specific performance on C2BMC would need to be evaluated against contractually defined objectives and user feedback.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how are they being measured?
The provided data does not explicitly list the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. However, given the nature of the services (operations, maintenance, integration, deployment, disposal), typical KPIs would likely include system uptime and availability, response times for maintenance and issue resolution, successful deployment of system updates, adherence to security protocols, and effective logistics management. Measurement would likely involve regular reporting from the contractor, system monitoring tools, and potentially user feedback from Combatant Commands. The effectiveness of these KPIs in ensuring mission readiness is crucial for the C2BMC system's success.
Are there any identified risks associated with the C2BMC system's technology obsolescence or cybersecurity vulnerabilities?
The provided data does not detail specific risks related to technology obsolescence or cybersecurity for the C2BMC system under this contract. However, for any complex, long-lifecycle defense system, these are inherent concerns. The 'disposal' aspect of the contract might imply planning for end-of-life components. Continuous updates and maintenance are crucial for mitigating obsolescence. Cybersecurity is paramount for C2BMC, requiring robust security measures, regular patching, and threat monitoring, which are likely key components of the 'operations and maintenance' and 'integration' services. Further investigation into specific system architecture and threat assessments would be needed for a comprehensive risk analysis.
What is the total estimated cost of the C2BMC program over its lifecycle, and how does this contract contribute to it?
The provided data only specifies the value of this particular task order ($163,991,187.83) and its duration (approx. 2 years). It does not offer information on the total lifecycle cost of the C2BMC program. C2BMC is a critical component of the Ballistic Missile Defense System, and its development and sustainment represent a significant, multi-year investment. This contract represents a portion of the ongoing sustainment and operational costs required to keep the system functional and effective throughout its intended lifespan. A full lifecycle cost analysis would encompass R&D, procurement, sustainment, and eventual disposal costs across all C2BMC elements.
More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Modification IS to Award F-35A Lrip 15 Usaf Aircraft* Long Lead Funding — $30.1B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Award Long Lead Funding for F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C Aircraft for U.S. Services, Non-Dod Partners, and FMS Customers — $24.5B (Department of Defense)
- Lrip 11 AAC — $12.3B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)