DOJ's $1.65B Correctional Institutions Contract with Management & Training Corp. Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,516,275 ($16.5M)
Contractor: Management & Training Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2002-05-15
End Date: 2008-04-07
Contract Duration: 2,154 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: TEXAS
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $16.5 million to MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $1.65 billion over 6 years. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Potential risks associated with long-term correctional facility management. 4. Spending falls within the correctional institutions sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $1.65 billion over 6 years is substantial. Benchmarking against similar correctional institution contracts is difficult without specific service details, but the duration and scale suggest a significant investment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating multiple bidders were considered. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for correctional services.
Public Impact
Impacts federal and state correctional systems by outsourcing management. Affects inmate welfare and rehabilitation programs. Potential for job creation or loss in the private correctional sector. Raises questions about the cost-effectiveness and quality of private prison management.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 76 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long-term reliance on a single contractor for essential services.
- Potential for cost overruns or service quality degradation over time.
- Contract duration of 6 years may limit flexibility to adapt to changing needs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Clear contract type (Firm Fixed Price) helps manage cost certainty.
- Contract is for correctional institutions, a critical government function.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the correctional institutions sector, which involves the management and operation of prisons and detention facilities. Spending benchmarks for this sector are highly variable based on facility size, location, and services provided.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the contractor is 'MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION' and the contract was awarded via 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION'. There is no specific information provided regarding small business participation or subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of Justice, Offices, Boards and Divisions. Oversight would typically involve monitoring contract performance, adherence to regulations, and financial accountability to ensure services are delivered as specified and taxpayer funds are managed appropriately.
Related Government Programs
- Correctional Institutions
- Department of Justice Contracting
- Offices, Boards and Divisions Programs
Risk Flags
- Long-term contract duration.
- Potential for service quality issues in correctional facilities.
- Reliance on a single private entity for essential government function.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
- Potential for cost escalation beyond initial estimates.
Tags
correctional-institutions, department-of-justice, tx, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $16.5 million to MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-05-15. End: 2008-04-07.
What is the cost per inmate per day under this contract, and how does it compare to government-operated facilities or other private contracts?
The provided data does not include cost per inmate per day. To assess value, this metric would need to be calculated by dividing the total contract value ($1.65 billion) by the total number of inmate days over the contract's 6-year duration. This figure should then be benchmarked against similar facilities and government-run institutions to determine cost-effectiveness and identify potential savings or overspending.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and what mechanisms are in place to mitigate risks related to inmate safety, security, and rehabilitation?
The data does not specify KPIs or risk mitigation mechanisms. Effective oversight would require clearly defined performance standards related to security, inmate care, healthcare, and rehabilitation programs. Robust monitoring and enforcement procedures, including penalties for non-compliance and regular audits, are crucial to ensure the contractor meets contractual obligations and addresses potential risks proactively.
How does the use of a private contractor for correctional institutions align with the Department of Justice's long-term strategy and public safety goals?
The alignment depends on the contractor's performance and the specific goals of the DOJ. While private contracts can offer cost savings and specialized expertise, they also introduce risks related to accountability, transparency, and potential conflicts of interest. The DOJ's strategy should consider whether outsourcing correctional management effectively supports its mission of public safety, justice, and rehabilitation, and whether the benefits outweigh the inherent risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Public Administration › Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities › Correctional Institutions
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 500 N MARKET PLACE DR, CENTERVILLE, UT, 02
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-05-15
Current End Date: 2008-04-07
Potential End Date: 2008-04-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-04-10
More Contracts from Management & Training Corporation
- TAS Code 151060 - Management and Operation of a Government-Owned, Contractor Operated, Correctional Institution in Taft, CA — $448.7M (Department of Justice)
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 7000 LOW Security Male Inmates — $360.8M (Department of Justice)
- Operation of Gary JC Center — $256.4M (Department of Labor)
- Operation of the Gary JCC — $220.1M (Department of Labor)
- Operation of Earle Clements JOB Corps Center — $175.1M (Department of Labor)
View all Management & Training Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)