Missile Defense Agency awards $48.4M for Program Review/Development Services to Decisive Analytics Corp
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $48,385,521 ($48.4M)
Contractor: Serco Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-06-10
End Date: 2012-03-31
Contract Duration: 2,851 days
Daily Burn Rate: $17.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200412!000647!9700!HQ0006!MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY !GS23F0382K !C!N! !N!HQ000604F0019! !20040610!20050630!036593457!036593457!036593457!N!DECISIVE ANALYTICS CORPORATION!1235 SOUTH CLARK STREET !ARLINGTON !VA!22202!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000002040081!N!N!000000000000!R409!PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !CAA !MDA SUPPORT !541710!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!B!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20301, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $48.4 million to SERCO INC. for work described as: 200412!000647!9700!HQ0006!MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY !GS23F0382K !C!N! !N!HQ000604F0019! !20040610!20050630!036593457!036593457!036593457!N!DECISIVE ANALYTICS CORPORATION!1235 SOUTH CLARK STREET !ARLINGTON !VA!22202!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLI… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Decisive Analytics Corporation for essential MDA support. 2. Significant funding allocated for program review and development services. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open', suggesting broad market engagement. 4. The sector is dominated by large defense contractors, with potential for specialized firms.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $48.4M over its duration appears reasonable for specialized engineering and program review services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale defense support contracts would provide further context.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The 'Full and Open Competition' method indicates that multiple vendors were likely considered, promoting price discovery and potentially leading to a more competitive price. The award to Decisive Analytics Corporation suggests they offered the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for critical defense program support, with competition aiming to ensure efficient allocation.
Public Impact
Supports national security through missile defense program oversight. Provides specialized technical expertise to the Missile Defense Agency. Contributes to the development and refinement of critical defense systems.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration is extensive (over 8 years).
- Potential for scope creep in long-term development services.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical support functions.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Contractor has a specific NAICS code for Engineering Services.
- Fixed-price contract type can control costs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting the Missile Defense Agency. Spending in this area is crucial for national security and often involves high-value, specialized contracts.
Small Business Impact
While the primary awardee is Decisive Analytics Corporation, the 'Full and Open Competition' process theoretically allows small businesses to participate, though large contracts often favor established prime contractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's long duration and focus on development services warrant ongoing oversight to ensure performance, cost control, and alignment with agency objectives.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Missile Defense Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (over 8 years).
- Potential for contractor lock-in.
- Complexity of services may lead to oversight challenges.
- Reliance on a single entity for critical support.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, dc, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $48.4 million to SERCO INC.. 200412!000647!9700!HQ0006!MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY !GS23F0382K !C!N! !N!HQ000604F0019! !20040610!20050630!036593457!036593457!036593457!N!DECISIVE ANALYTICS CORPORATION!1235 SOUTH CLARK STREET !ARLINGTON !VA!22202!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000002040081!N!N!000000000000!R409!PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !CAA !MDA SUPPORT !541710!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SERCO INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Missile Defense Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $48.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-06-10. End: 2012-03-31.
What specific program review and development services are included in this contract, and how do they align with current missile defense priorities?
The contract covers 'PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' (NAICS 541710) for the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). These services likely involve technical analysis, strategic planning, and support for the development lifecycle of missile defense systems. Alignment with current priorities would necessitate reviewing MDA's strategic goals and the specific tasks outlined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW).
Given the contract's length and fixed-price nature, what are the primary risks to the government regarding cost overruns or performance degradation?
The primary risks include potential scope creep if the SOW is not tightly managed, leading to increased costs despite the fixed-price structure. Performance degradation is a risk if the contractor's expertise wanes or motivation decreases over the long term. Robust oversight and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate these risks.
How effectively does this contract leverage competition to ensure the Missile Defense Agency receives optimal value for its investment in engineering services?
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition,' which is a strong indicator of effective competition. This method allows all responsible sources to submit offers, fostering a competitive environment that should drive better pricing and service quality. The agency's selection process would determine the ultimate effectiveness in securing optimal value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1400 CRYSTAL DR SUITE 1400, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $55,040,964
Exercised Options: $55,040,964
Current Obligation: $48,385,521
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F0382K
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-06-10
Current End Date: 2012-03-31
Potential End Date: 2012-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-12-24
More Contracts from Serco Inc.
- -Pphf-2013-Eligibility Support — $1.2B (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Eligibility Support — $1.0B (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Eligibility Support — $589.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Serco Management Services Inc for Area 5 Igf::ct::igf — $378.8M (Department of Transportation)
- J Plant Renovation — $327.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)