Missile Defense Agency contract for program management and support services awarded to Computer Sciences Corporation for over $31 million
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $31,038,427 ($31.0M)
Contractor: Csra LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-06-27
End Date: 2011-11-30
Contract Duration: 3,078 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200311!000486!9700!ZD60 !MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY !GS23F0092K !C!N! !N!HQ000603F0016 !20030627!20070629!043991108!043991108!009581091!N!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000000440043!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !561110!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35801
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $31.0 million to CSRA LLC for work described as: 200311!000486!9700!ZD60 !MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY !GS23F0092K !C!N! !N!HQ000603F0016 !20030627!20070629!043991108!043991108!009581091!N!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLIN… Key points: 1. Contract value of over $31 million indicates a significant investment in program management and support. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract (over 8 years) points to a long-term need for these services. 4. The primary service category is Program Management/Support Services, crucial for complex defense initiatives. 5. The contractor, Computer Sciences Corporation, has a substantial federal contract history. 6. The contract's fixed-price nature aims to control costs for the government.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $31,038,427.34 over its period of performance appears reasonable for comprehensive program management and support services for a major defense agency like the Missile Defense Agency. Benchmarking against similar large-scale support contracts within the Department of Defense would provide further context, but the fixed-price structure suggests an effort to establish clear cost expectations. The absence of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes a detailed value-for-money assessment challenging, but the competitive award process is a positive indicator.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited and evaluated. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, encouraging bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions to win the contract. The fact that it was competed openly suggests that the Missile Defense Agency sought the most advantageous offer available in the marketplace for these critical support services.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through market forces and ensures the government receives the best value for its investment. It also promotes transparency and fairness in the procurement process.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Missile Defense Agency, which receives essential program management and support services to execute its mission. Services delivered include program management, technical support, and administrative functions vital for complex defense projects. The geographic impact is primarily within the agency's operational areas, likely supporting national defense initiatives. Workforce implications include the employment of personnel by Computer Sciences Corporation to fulfill the contract requirements, contributing to the defense industry workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs, despite the fixed-price nature.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical support functions could pose a risk if performance falters.
- Limited visibility into the specific performance metrics and quality of services rendered without further data.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
- Fixed-price contract type helps to control costs and provides budget certainty.
- Long contract duration indicates a stable, ongoing need and potential for contractor expertise development.
- Contractor (Computer Sciences Corporation) is a large, established entity with significant federal contracting experience.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting program management and technical services for defense applications. The Missile Defense Agency operates in a highly specialized and technologically advanced segment of the defense industry. Spending in this area is driven by national security requirements and the continuous need for advanced technological solutions. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within large, complex system integration and program support contracts awarded by other major defense agencies.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. As a large contract awarded to a major corporation, the primary focus is likely on the prime contractor's capabilities. However, large prime contractors often engage small businesses for specialized support or components, so there may be indirect subcontracting opportunities, but this is not detailed in the available information.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Missile Defense Agency's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract structure, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance details may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Missile Defense Systems
- Aerospace Engineering Services
- Defense Program Management
- Information Technology Support Services
- Federal IT and Engineering Contracts
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk of obsolescence or changing requirements.
- Dependence on a single large contractor for critical support functions.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data hinders detailed evaluation.
Tags
defense, missile-defense-agency, program-management, support-services, computer-sciences-corporation, csc, engineering-services, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, large-contract, department-of-defense, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $31.0 million to CSRA LLC. 200311!000486!9700!ZD60 !MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY !GS23F0092K !C!N! !N!HQ000603F0016 !20030627!20070629!043991108!043991108!009581091!N!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000000440043!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !561110!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CSRA LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Missile Defense Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $31.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-06-27. End: 2011-11-30.
What is the track record of Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) in performing similar program management and support services for the Department of Defense?
Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), prior to its merger and rebranding, has a long and extensive history of performing large-scale IT and professional services contracts for the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. Their track record includes providing program management, systems engineering, integration, and sustainment support for complex defense programs. While specific performance details for this particular Missile Defense Agency contract are not fully detailed here, CSC's general experience suggests a capacity to handle such requirements. However, a thorough assessment would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any documented issues or successes on comparable contracts, and their overall financial stability and operational capabilities.
How does the awarded amount of over $31 million compare to similar program management support contracts within the Missile Defense Agency or other defense agencies?
The awarded amount of $31,038,427.34 for program management and support services over an approximately 8-year period (from 2003 to 2011) represents an average annual value of roughly $3.8 million. This figure appears moderate for supporting a major defense agency like the Missile Defense Agency, which manages highly complex and critical systems. Comparable contracts for similar services within the DoD can range from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on the scope, duration, and criticality of the program. Factors such as the specific deliverables, level of technical expertise required, and the number of personnel involved significantly influence contract value. Without more detailed scope information, a precise comparison is difficult, but the value seems aligned with substantial, yet not exceptionally large, support service contracts.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?
The provided data does not explicitly detail the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or specific metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract. Typically, for program management and support services, KPIs might include on-time delivery of milestones, adherence to budget, quality of reports and documentation, effectiveness of risk management, responsiveness to agency needs, and successful coordination of various program elements. The contract's fixed-price nature implies that meeting the defined scope of work within the agreed price is a primary measure of success. However, the absence of explicit performance metrics in this summary limits a granular assessment of contractor performance quality.
What is the potential impact of this contract on the broader defense technology and services market?
This contract, awarded to Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), signifies a substantial investment by the Missile Defense Agency in program management and support services. Its award through full and open competition suggests a healthy market for such services, where multiple capable firms can compete. The contract's value and duration indicate a stable revenue stream for CSC, potentially enabling them to invest further in specialized talent and capabilities relevant to missile defense. This, in turn, can foster innovation and maintain a high level of expertise within the defense services sector. Furthermore, it underscores the ongoing demand for sophisticated program management crucial for the development and deployment of advanced defense systems.
Are there any known risks associated with Computer Sciences Corporation's performance on this or similar contracts?
Assessing specific risks associated with Computer Sciences Corporation's (CSC) performance on this particular contract requires access to detailed performance reviews and historical data, which are not fully provided here. However, like any large contractor performing complex government work, potential risks could include challenges in meeting deadlines, managing scope changes, ensuring consistent quality of service, or adapting to evolving technological requirements. CSC, as a large entity, has experienced various organizational changes, including mergers and acquisitions, which can sometimes introduce transitional risks. A comprehensive risk assessment would involve examining past performance reports, any contract disputes or terminations, and the contractor's financial health and strategic direction.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3170 FAIRVIEW PARK DR, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $34,585,070
Exercised Options: $34,528,820
Current Obligation: $31,038,427
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F0092K
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-06-27
Current End Date: 2011-11-30
Potential End Date: 2011-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-08-30
More Contracts from Csra LLC
- . Cecom LRC IS to BE the Provider of Choice for Support of the Worlds Best C4isr Systems, Including Equipment Training, Technical Assistance, and Forward Sustainment Services to the Warfighter — $623.5M (General Services Administration)
- 200505!000083!5700!fa4600!55cons/Cc !FA460004C0010 !a!y!c!y! !p00007!20050101!20050930!169105165!169105165!009581091!n!computer Sciences Corporation !408 Galvin RD N !bellevue !ne!68005!35875!153!31!offutt AFB !sarpy !nebraska !+000001441609!n!n!000000000000!j070!maint & Repair of Eq/Adp Equip & Supplies !S1 !services !000 !* !541512!E! !3! ! !B! ! !20200930!B!F! !A! !a!n!r!2!006!b! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $594.9M (Department of Defense)
- THE Scope of This Task Order IS to Operate, and Maintain the Obim Infrastructure Components and Associated Functionality of the Production and Non-Production Ident Environments and Associated Business Systems Currently Deployed With the DHS Data Centers 1&2. Operations and Maintenance Activities — $487.9M (Department of Homeland Security)
- THE Purpose of This Task Order IS to Procure Datacenters Operational and Maintenance Support Services — $334.3M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Time and Materials Task for Enterprise Data Architecture Activities and Deliverables — $224.4M (Department of Education)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)