HHS awarded $16.4M for administrative management consulting, with STG International Inc. as the primary contractor

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,424,596 ($16.4M)

Contractor: STG International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2006-04-24

End Date: 2011-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,832 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.0K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: OFFICE SUPPLIES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20201, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $16.4 million to STG INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: OFFICE SUPPLIES Key points: 1. The contract focused on administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. STG International, Inc. secured this contract, indicating a specific capability in this service area. 3. The contract duration was substantial, spanning over 1800 days, suggesting a long-term need for these services. 4. The award was made under a competitive delivery order, implying a degree of market vetting. 5. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that cost risks were largely borne by the contractor. 6. The contract was awarded to a single vendor, which warrants further examination of competition dynamics.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific deliverables or performance metrics. However, the firm fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope and budget, which can be advantageous for cost control. The duration of the contract (over 1800 days) indicates a significant investment, and its success would depend on the effective delivery of administrative management consulting services. Comparing this to similar contracts would require detailed analysis of the scope of work and the specific consulting services provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order. While this indicates that multiple vendors were likely considered or competed for the task order, the data does not specify the number of bidders. A competitive process generally aims to foster price discovery and ensure fair market value. However, the specifics of the competition, such as the number of proposals received and the evaluation criteria, are crucial for a complete assessment.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process, even for a delivery order, suggests that taxpayers likely benefited from a more favorable price compared to a sole-source award. It also implies that the government sought to leverage market competition to obtain the best value for the services rendered.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely the administrative functions within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The services delivered would have supported the operational efficiency and management of various HHS programs. The geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, where the contractor is based and likely where services were primarily performed. The contract supported administrative roles, potentially impacting the federal workforce through improved management practices and support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true value and impact of the consulting services.
The long duration of the contract could lead to vendor lock-in or reduced flexibility if needs change.
Without details on the competitive process, it's hard to confirm if the best possible price was achieved.

Positive Signals

The contract was awarded through a competitive delivery order, suggesting some level of market evaluation.
The firm fixed-price contract structure shifts cost risk to the contractor, potentially benefiting the government.
The contract duration indicates a sustained need and likely a successful, ongoing relationship with the contractor.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This is a broad category encompassing services that help organizations improve their efficiency and effectiveness. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. Federal spending in this area supports a wide range of government functions, from strategic planning to operational improvements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through set-asides is minimal. However, STG International, Inc. may engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would contribute to the small business ecosystem. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to fully assess the impact.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Health and Human Services' internal contracting and program management offices. The Assistant Secretary for Administration's office, which awarded the contract, would be responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring compliance. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. Specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on the nature of any potential fraud, waste, or abuse identified.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management Services
Management and Consulting Services
Professional Services Contracts
Federal IT Consulting
Government Program Management Support

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may indicate potential for scope creep or evolving requirements.
Lack of detailed performance metrics hinders objective value assessment.
Competitive delivery order details (number of bidders, evaluation) are not specified.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $16.4 million to STG INTERNATIONAL, INC.. OFFICE SUPPLIES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STG INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-04-24. End: 2011-04-30.

What specific administrative management and general management consulting services were provided under this contract?

The contract, awarded under NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services), implies a broad range of services aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations. This could include strategic planning, organizational design, process improvement, performance management, human capital consulting, and change management. Without specific task orders or statements of work, the precise nature of the services remains general. However, given the awarding agency (HHS), these services likely supported the administration and management of health and human services programs, potentially focusing on areas like program oversight, operational streamlining, or policy implementation support.

How does the contract value of $16.4 million compare to similar administrative consulting contracts within HHS or other federal agencies?

Comparing the $16.4 million contract value requires context regarding the duration and scope of services. This contract spanned over 1800 days (approximately 5 years), making the annual value around $3.3 million. This figure is moderate for large-scale federal consulting engagements. Many federal agencies, including HHS, award contracts for management consulting services ranging from tens of thousands to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on the complexity and duration. Larger, more comprehensive engagements, such as enterprise-wide system implementations or major strategic overhauls, can easily exceed this value. Conversely, smaller, more targeted consulting tasks would be significantly less. Therefore, $16.4 million over five years for administrative consulting appears within a reasonable range for a sustained, significant engagement.

What is STG International, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly within HHS?

STG International, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, including those with the Department of Health and Human Services. Examining their contract portfolio reveals a presence in providing various professional services, which may include administrative support, management consulting, and other specialized areas. Their ability to secure a $16.4 million contract over five years suggests a demonstrated capacity to meet government requirements and performance expectations. A deeper analysis of their past performance ratings, any past performance issues, and their overall contract award history would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their track record and suitability for such engagements.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. In administrative management and general management consulting contracts, KPIs are typically defined in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) and are crucial for evaluating the contractor's performance and the value delivered. Examples of potential KPIs could include improvements in process efficiency (e.g., reduced processing times), cost savings achieved, successful implementation of new management strategies, enhanced organizational effectiveness scores, or adherence to project timelines and budgets. Without these details, a quantitative assessment of the contract's success is not possible.

How has federal spending on administrative management consulting services evolved over the past decade, and where does this contract fit?

Federal spending on administrative management consulting services has generally seen fluctuations over the past decade, influenced by budget cycles, agency priorities, and the need for specialized expertise. Agencies like HHS consistently require such services to manage complex programs and improve operational efficiency. This $16.4 million contract, awarded between 2006 and 2011, represents a significant, multi-year investment in consulting support during that period. While overall federal spending trends in this category can be tracked through sources like the Congressional Budget Office or agency budget reports, this specific contract fits within the typical range for substantial, long-term consulting engagements aimed at improving administrative functions within a large federal agency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: OFFICE SUPPLIES AND DEVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 99 CANAL CENTER PLZ STE 500, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,424,596

Exercised Options: $16,424,596

Current Obligation: $16,424,596

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS02F0040P

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline