HHS awarded $59.4M contract for biological product manufacturing to Novartis, with 5 bidders
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $59,391,256 ($59.4M)
Contractor: Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Start Date: 2013-09-12
End Date: 2014-01-15
Contract Duration: 125 days
Daily Burn Rate: $475.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: ASPR-13-10102
Place of Performance
Location: EMERYVILLE, ALAMEDA County, CALIFORNIA, 94608, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Health and Human Services obligated $59.4 million to NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. for work described as: ASPR-13-10102 Key points: 1. The contract value of $59.4 million appears reasonable given the scope of biological product manufacturing. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. The short duration (125 days) may indicate a specific, time-sensitive need rather than long-term production. 4. The contract falls under the 'Biological Product (except Diagnostic) Manufacturing' category, indicating specialized services. 5. The award to a large, established company like Novartis suggests a focus on reliability and expertise. 6. The contract's geographic focus is California, aligning with the contractor's operational presence.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $59.4 million for biological product manufacturing is within a typical range for such specialized services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for vaccine or therapeutic production would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract shifts risk to the contractor, which can be favorable for the government if costs are managed effectively. The relatively short performance period suggests a focused project rather than a broad, long-term manufacturing agreement.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With five bidders participating, the competition level suggests a healthy market for these specialized manufacturing services. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of technical solutions. The agency's decision to use full and open competition implies confidence in the market's ability to meet the requirement effectively.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to vie for the contract, driving down costs and ensuring the government receives the best possible value for its investment.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of Health and Human Services and potentially the public, through the ensured availability of biological products. The service delivered is the manufacturing of biological products, crucial for public health initiatives. The geographic impact is centered in California, where the manufacturing is expected to take place. Workforce implications include employment opportunities within the biological product manufacturing sector in California.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for supply chain disruptions if Novartis faces unforeseen manufacturing issues.
- Reliance on a single contractor for a critical biological product could pose a risk if alternatives are not readily available.
- The short contract duration might indicate a one-off need, potentially leading to re-competition and associated transition costs in the future.
Positive Signals
- Award to a well-established company like Novartis suggests a high likelihood of successful delivery.
- Full and open competition indicates a robust market and potential for competitive pricing.
- The firm fixed-price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
Sector Analysis
The biological product manufacturing sector is a highly specialized and regulated industry. This contract fits within the broader pharmaceutical and biotechnology landscape, which is characterized by significant R&D investment, stringent quality control, and complex supply chains. The market size for biological product manufacturing is substantial, driven by demand for vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing contracts for similar product types and manufacturing scales, often in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside. Given the specialized nature of biological product manufacturing, it is common for such contracts to be awarded to large, established firms with the necessary infrastructure and expertise. There is no explicit indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data, though it is possible that Novartis may engage small businesses as part of its supply chain.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Health and Human Services, specifically the Office of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR). Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified biological products. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- Biologics and Vaccine Procurement
- Medical Countermeasures Manufacturing
- Public Health Emergency Preparedness
- Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Contracts
Risk Flags
- Short contract duration may indicate a specific, time-bound need.
- Reliance on a single large contractor for specialized manufacturing.
- Potential for supply chain vulnerabilities in biological product manufacturing.
Tags
healthcare, hhs, aspr, biological-product-manufacturing, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, novartis, california, large-contract, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, medical-countermeasures
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Health and Human Services awarded $59.4 million to NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC.. ASPR-13-10102
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Office of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $59.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2013-09-12. End: 2014-01-15.
What is Novartis's track record with government contracts, particularly for biological product manufacturing?
Novartis, through its various divisions including Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, has a history of engaging in government contracts. While specific details for this particular contract (ASPR-13-10102) are limited in the provided data, the company is a major global pharmaceutical and biotechnology firm with extensive experience in research, development, and manufacturing of vaccines and other biological products. Their track record generally indicates a capacity for large-scale production and adherence to regulatory standards. A deeper dive into their contract history with HHS and other agencies would reveal specific performance metrics, past issues, and successes in similar manufacturing endeavors. This would include examining any past performance evaluations or disputes related to government contracts.
How does the $59.4 million contract value compare to similar biological product manufacturing contracts awarded by HHS or other agencies?
The $59.4 million contract value for biological product manufacturing is a significant but not extraordinary amount for this sector. Contracts for vaccine production, therapeutic manufacturing, or specialized biologics can range widely, from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on the product's complexity, scale of production, and duration. For instance, contracts related to pandemic preparedness or the development of novel treatments often involve substantial funding. To provide a precise benchmark, one would need to compare this contract against others for similar types of biological products (e.g., viral vaccines, monoclonal antibodies) awarded over a comparable timeframe and with similar production volumes. The relatively short performance period (125 days) suggests this value might represent a specific production run or phase rather than a multi-year manufacturing agreement.
What are the key risks associated with this specific contract, and how are they mitigated?
Key risks for this contract include potential manufacturing delays or quality control issues, given the complexity of biological product production. Supply chain disruptions for raw materials or specialized components could also impact delivery timelines. The reliance on a single contractor, even a large one like Novartis, presents a risk if unforeseen problems arise that cannot be quickly resolved. Mitigation strategies are likely embedded in the contract terms. The firm fixed-price structure incentivizes Novartis to manage costs and timelines effectively. Furthermore, government oversight, quality assurance protocols, and potential penalties for non-performance serve as risk mitigation measures. The short duration might also limit the exposure to long-term risks.
How effective is the firm fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money for this biological product manufacturing requirement?
The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective for ensuring value for money when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks are manageable. For biological product manufacturing, where specifications can be precise, an FFP contract shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor (Novartis). This incentivizes the contractor to be efficient and control costs to maximize profit. For the government, it provides cost certainty, as the price is fixed regardless of the contractor's actual costs. This is advantageous for taxpayers, as it prevents unexpected cost increases. However, if unforeseen technical challenges arise that significantly increase the contractor's costs, the contractor may be less willing or able to absorb them, potentially impacting quality or delivery if not managed through contract clauses.
What is the historical spending pattern for biological product manufacturing by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR)?
The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) within HHS is responsible for leading the nation in preventing, preparing for, and responding to public health emergencies. A significant portion of their budget is allocated to procuring medical countermeasures, including vaccines and therapeutics, which often fall under biological product manufacturing. Historical spending patterns for ASPR in this area would likely show fluctuations tied to specific public health threats (e.g., influenza pandemics, emerging infectious diseases) and strategic stockpiling initiatives. Spending can be substantial during such events or for long-term preparedness contracts. Analyzing ASPR's contract awards over the past decade would reveal trends in investment in domestic manufacturing capabilities, specific product categories prioritized, and the types of contractors (large vs. small, domestic vs. foreign) they typically engage.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing › Biological Product (except Diagnostic) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: MEDICAL/DENTAL/VETERINARY EQPT/SUPP
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 11100SOL00020
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Novartis AG (UEI: 485609796)
Address: 350 MASSACHUSETTS AVE, CAMBRIDGE, MA, 02139
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $59,391,256
Exercised Options: $59,391,256
Current Obligation: $59,391,256
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HHSO100201200014I
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2013-09-12
Current End Date: 2014-01-15
Potential End Date: 2015-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-01-30
More Contracts from Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc.
- Vaccine for Children (VFC) 2014 — $88.7M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Vaccine for Children 2013 — $74.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Vaccine for Children 2011 — $46.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- VFC 2012 — $43.4M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- TAS::75 0885::TAS HIV Design and Development Teams, Part a - Preventative Vaccines — $29.4M (Department of Health and Human Services)
View all Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts
- Contact Center Operations (CCO) — $5.5B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- TAS::75 0849::TAS Oper of Govt R&D Goco Facilities — $4.8B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide the Full Complement of Services Necessary to Care for UC in ORR Custody Including Facilities Set-Up, Maintenance, and Support Internal and Perimeter (IF Applicable) Security, Direct Care and Supervision Inc — $3.5B (Rapid Deployment Inc)
- Contact Center Operations — $2.6B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- Federal Contract — $2.4B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →