HHS awards $58M contract for health performance measurement to National Quality Forum

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $57,998,968 ($58.0M)

Contractor: National Quality Forum

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2009-01-14

End Date: 2013-07-13

Contract Duration: 1,641 days

Daily Burn Rate: $35.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: CONSENSUS BASED ENTITIES REGARDING HEALTH PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20005

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $58.0 million to NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM for work described as: CONSENSUS BASED ENTITIES REGARDING HEALTH PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to National Quality Forum for health performance measurement. 2. Significant contract value of $57.99M over its duration. 3. Full and open competition was utilized for this award. 4. The sector is primarily professional, scientific, and technical services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. However, the fixed fee component provides some cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Full and open competition was used, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value.

Public Impact

Enhances the development and implementation of health performance measures. Supports efforts to improve healthcare quality and patient outcomes. Impacts a wide range of healthcare providers and beneficiaries through improved measurement standards.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under professional, scientific, and technical services, specifically focusing on healthcare quality measurement. Spending in this area is critical for government initiatives aimed at improving public health outcomes.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting large businesses may have been primary bidders.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's long duration and Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure necessitate robust oversight from CMS to ensure adherence to scope and budget, and to track performance effectively.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

all-other-professional-scientific-and-te, department-of-health-and-human-services, dc, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $58.0 million to NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM. CONSENSUS BASED ENTITIES REGARDING HEALTH PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $58.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-01-14. End: 2013-07-13.

What specific performance metrics were used to evaluate the National Quality Forum's success under this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific performance metrics used to evaluate the National Quality Forum. Further review of the contract's statement of work and performance work statement would be necessary to identify these metrics and assess the contractor's adherence to them.

How did the fixed fee component of the Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract align with the value delivered for health performance measurement?

Assessing the alignment of the fixed fee with delivered value requires detailed performance data and comparison against benchmarks for similar services. Without this, it's difficult to definitively state if the fee was commensurate with the outcomes achieved in improving health performance measurement.

What was the competitive landscape like for this contract, and did full and open competition truly yield the best value?

While full and open competition was utilized, the specific number of bidders and their proposals are not detailed. This method generally promotes value, but a deeper analysis of the bidding process and the final award price relative to independent cost estimates would confirm if optimal value was achieved.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesOther Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesAll Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 601 13TH ST N W STE 500 N, WASHINGTON, DC, 20005

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $57,998,968

Exercised Options: $57,998,968

Current Obligation: $57,998,968

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-01-14

Current End Date: 2013-07-13

Potential End Date: 2013-07-13 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-03-16

More Contracts from National Quality Forum

View all National Quality Forum federal contracts →

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending