HHS awards $17.6M contract for Oklahoma Quality Improvement Organization Program to Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,992,647 ($17.0M)
Contractor: Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Start Date: 2008-03-04
End Date: 2010-10-25
Contract Duration: 965 days
Daily Burn Rate: $17.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: OKLAHOMA QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION PROGRAM
Place of Performance
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73134
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Health and Human Services obligated $17.0 million to OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL QUALITY INC for work described as: OKLAHOMA QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION PROGRAM Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single entity, raising questions about competition. 2. The contract's cost-plus award fee structure may incentivize higher spending. 3. Long contract duration (965 days) could lead to cost overruns. 4. The specific sector is public health administration, with limited detail on performance metrics.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure, while allowing for flexibility, can lead to higher costs if not tightly managed. Benchmarking against similar public health program administration contracts is difficult without more detailed performance and cost data.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, suggesting a sole-source or limited competition award. This lack of open bidding limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competitive bidding may result in a higher overall cost to taxpayers compared to a fully competed contract.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be paying more due to the lack of competition. The effectiveness of the quality improvement program is not detailed, impacting public health outcomes. Long-term contracts can sometimes lead to complacency and reduced innovation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost-plus award fee structure
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Definitive contract awarded
- Specific program focus
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under public health program administration. Benchmarks for similar quality improvement programs are difficult to ascertain without more specific details on the scope of work and performance metrics.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract type (Definitive Contract) suggests a clear scope, but the 'Cost Plus Award Fee' structure requires robust oversight from CMS to ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent unnecessary spending.
Related Government Programs
- Administration of Public Health Programs
- Department of Health and Human Services Contracting
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
- Lack of transparency in competition.
- Unclear performance metrics and value for money.
- Long contract duration may reduce agility.
Tags
administration-of-public-health-programs, department-of-health-and-human-services, ok, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Health and Human Services awarded $17.0 million to OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL QUALITY INC. OKLAHOMA QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION PROGRAM
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL QUALITY INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-03-04. End: 2010-10-25.
What specific quality improvement metrics are being tracked, and how is performance measured against the award fee structure?
The provided data does not specify the quality improvement metrics or the criteria for the award fee. Effective oversight would require detailed performance reports and independent verification of achieved quality improvements to justify the awarded fees and ensure taxpayer value.
What is the justification for awarding this contract on a limited competition basis, and what steps were taken to ensure fair pricing?
The data states the contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' implying a sole-source or limited justification. Without further details on this justification, it's impossible to assess if fair pricing was achieved or if alternative sources were adequately considered.
How does the $17.6 million expenditure align with the expected outcomes and long-term benefits for Oklahoma's healthcare quality?
The provided data lacks information on the expected outcomes and long-term benefits of the Oklahoma Quality Improvement Organization Program. A comprehensive analysis would require a clear statement of objectives, measurable goals, and a cost-benefit analysis to determine if the $17.6 million investment yields sufficient improvements in healthcare quality.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Public Administration › Administration of Human Resource Programs › Administration of Public Health Programs
Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › DEPENDENT MEDICARE SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14000 QUAIL SPRINGS PKWY #400, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, 73134
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,992,647
Exercised Options: $16,992,647
Current Obligation: $16,992,647
Actual Outlays: $210,578
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-03-04
Current End Date: 2010-10-25
Potential End Date: 2010-10-25 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-10-18
More Contracts from Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Inc
- QIO 10TH SOW Award for the State of Oklahoma — $22.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- 9TH SOW QIO Base Contract for Oklahoma — $18.8M (Department of Health and Human Services)
View all Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Inc federal contracts →
Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts
- Contact Center Operations (CCO) — $5.5B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- TAS::75 0849::TAS Oper of Govt R&D Goco Facilities — $4.8B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide the Full Complement of Services Necessary to Care for UC in ORR Custody Including Facilities Set-Up, Maintenance, and Support Internal and Perimeter (IF Applicable) Security, Direct Care and Supervision Inc — $3.5B (Rapid Deployment Inc)
- Contact Center Operations — $2.6B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- Federal Contract — $2.4B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →