Leidos Inc. contract for IT services with HHS/CDC awarded in 2003 for $39.3M, ending in 2008

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $39,286,337 ($39.3M)

Contractor: Leidos, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2003-02-07

End Date: 2008-10-31

Contract Duration: 2,093 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: SELECT AGENT PROGRAM

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, DEKALB County, GEORGIA, 30329

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $39.3 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: SELECT AGENT PROGRAM Key points: 1. Contract awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type was Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 3. The contract duration was substantial at 2093 days, indicating a long-term need for the services. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541519 points to 'Other Computer Related Services', a broad category. 5. The contract was awarded to a single vendor, Leidos, Inc., which was the only bidder. 6. The contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor did it involve subcontracting with small businesses.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more specific details on the services rendered and market rates at the time. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type inherently carries risks of cost escalation compared to fixed-price contracts. However, given it was a definitive contract with a single awardee, the pricing structure would have been negotiated. Without comparable contract data for similar IT services from the same period, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition. However, despite the broad competition, only one bid was received from Leidos, Inc. This could indicate a highly specialized service where few companies possess the capability, or potentially a lack of aggressive outreach to potential bidders. The limited number of bidders, even under an open competition, might have reduced the pressure on pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: While the competition was open, the receipt of only one bid means taxpayers may not have benefited from the full price discovery that multiple competitive offers typically provide.

Public Impact

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) likely benefited from the IT services provided, supporting its public health mission. The contract supported the agency's operational needs through computer-related services. The geographic impact was primarily within the state of Georgia, where the CDC's headquarters are located. The contract supported a workforce involved in IT services, though specific numbers are not detailed.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically under 'Other Computer Related Services'. The IT services market for government agencies is vast and competitive, encompassing a wide range of support, development, and maintenance. Contracts like this are crucial for agencies to maintain and upgrade their technological infrastructure to support their core missions. Benchmarking requires comparison to similar IT service contracts awarded by federal agencies during the 2003-2008 timeframe, considering the specific nature of the services provided.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, it did not directly contribute to the small business contracting goals or provide opportunities within the small business ecosystem for this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the contracting officers and program managers within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Accountability measures would be tied to the performance clauses within the Cost Plus Fixed Fee agreement. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, health-and-human-services, centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention, definitive-contract, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, georgia, information-technology, computer-related-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $39.3 million to LEIDOS, INC.. SELECT AGENT PROGRAM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $39.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-02-07. End: 2008-10-31.

What specific 'Other Computer Related Services' were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the NAICS code is 541519, which covers 'Other Computer Related Services'. This is a broad category that can include services such as IT consulting, custom software development, IT support, data processing, and IT project management that do not fit into more specific NAICS codes. Without further documentation or details from the contract award itself, the precise nature of the services rendered by Leidos, Inc. to the CDC remains unspecified. This lack of specificity makes it challenging to benchmark the contract's value against market rates for particular IT functions or to assess its direct impact on the CDC's technological capabilities.

How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure compare to other contract types for IT services?

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type is characterized by the government reimbursing the contractor for allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. This structure is often used when the scope of work is not well-defined or involves significant uncertainty, making it difficult to estimate costs accurately upfront. Compared to fixed-price contracts, CPFF offers flexibility but carries a higher risk of cost overruns for the government, as the contractor is incentivized to incur costs to cover the base. Conversely, it provides less profit potential for the contractor than some other cost-reimbursement types. For IT services, fixed-price contracts are generally preferred when requirements are stable and well-understood, offering better cost certainty for the government.

What are the implications of only one bid being received under a 'Full and Open Competition' award?

Receiving only one bid under a 'Full and Open Competition' solicitation presents a mixed signal. On one hand, it indicates that the solicitation was publicly advertised, adhering to the principle of broad market access. However, the lack of multiple bids suggests potential issues such as a highly specialized market where few entities possess the required capabilities, insufficient outreach to potential bidders, overly restrictive requirements, or perhaps a lack of perceived value or opportunity by the market. For taxpayers, this can mean a missed opportunity for robust price competition, potentially leading to a less favorable price than could have been achieved with multiple competing offers. It warrants further investigation into the solicitation process and market dynamics.

What was Leidos, Inc.'s track record with the federal government around the time of this award (2003)?

Leidos, Inc. (and its predecessor, Science Applications International Corporation - SAIC, prior to its split) has a long and extensive history as a major federal contractor. Around 2003, SAIC was already a significant player, holding numerous large contracts across various agencies, including defense, intelligence, and civilian sectors, particularly in IT, systems engineering, and support services. Their track record generally involved large-scale, complex projects. The award of this $39.3 million contract by the CDC in 2003 aligns with their established profile as a capable provider of IT services to government entities during that period. Their extensive experience likely contributed to their ability to secure this contract.

How does the $39.3 million total award value compare to typical IT spending by agencies like the CDC?

The $39.3 million total award value for this contract, spread over its approximately 5.7-year duration (2093 days), averages around $6.9 million per year. For a large federal agency like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which manages extensive public health programs and requires robust IT infrastructure, this figure represents a moderate investment in IT services during the mid-2000s. Federal IT spending has generally trended upwards, and agencies of the CDC's size often manage portfolios of IT contracts ranging from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars annually, covering software, hardware, cybersecurity, and various IT support services. Therefore, this specific contract, while significant, would likely have been one component of the CDC's broader IT budget.

What were the primary risks associated with this specific contract, given its type and duration?

The primary risks associated with this contract, given its Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure and long duration (nearly 6 years), include: 1) Cost Overruns: CPFF contracts inherently carry the risk that actual costs could exceed initial estimates, leading to higher final payouts for the government, especially if oversight is lax. 2) Scope Creep: The extended duration increases the likelihood that requirements may evolve, potentially leading to changes and additional costs if not managed through formal contract modification processes. 3) Performance Issues: Ensuring consistent quality and performance over such a long period can be challenging. 4) Vendor Lock-in: A long-term contract with a single vendor can create dependency, making it difficult to switch providers or adopt new technologies if the incumbent vendor is not proactive. 5) Limited Innovation: A fixed fee might not strongly incentivize the contractor to propose innovative cost-saving solutions throughout the contract life.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: INSTRUMENTS AND LABORATORY EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 2003N00716

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Address: 10260 CAMPUS POINT DR, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92121

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $425,667,424

Exercised Options: $342,012,227

Current Obligation: $39,286,337

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-02-07

Current End Date: 2008-10-31

Potential End Date: 2008-10-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-12-10

More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.

View all Leidos, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending