DoD Awards $43.7M for IT Training to Four LLC, Highlighting Potential Value and Oversight Concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $43,669,861 ($43.7M)

Contractor: Four LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-06-24

End Date: 2024-06-23

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $29.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: TRAINING

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $43.7 million to FOUR LLC for work described as: TRAINING Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $43.7M for IT training services. 2. Competition method indicates a move towards broader participation after initial exclusions. 3. Risk of potential overspending exists given the fixed-price nature and lack of explicit cost controls. 4. IT services sector sees continued investment in specialized training.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's fixed-price structure suggests an attempt at cost control. However, without detailed cost breakdowns or benchmarks for similar specialized IT training, assessing true value for money is challenging. The award amount is substantial, necessitating careful monitoring of deliverables.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' suggesting an initial limited scope that was later broadened. This method can impact price discovery, potentially leading to higher prices than a truly open competition might yield.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for specialized IT training. The effectiveness of the training and the efficiency of the procurement process will determine the ultimate taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Ensures critical IT skills development within the Department of Defense. Supports a specific contractor, Four LLC, in delivering specialized services. Potential for improved operational efficiency through enhanced personnel capabilities. Highlights the ongoing need for advanced IT training in government.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on specialized training. Spending in this area is driven by the need to keep government IT personnel updated on evolving technologies and cybersecurity threats. Benchmarks for similar large-scale IT training contracts are often difficult to establish due to the specialized nature of the content.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small businesses were not directly involved in this specific award, as the prime contractor is Four LLC and the 'sb' (small business) flag is false. Opportunities for small businesses may exist further down the subcontracting chain, but this award does not appear to directly benefit them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will be crucial to ensure Four LLC delivers the contracted training effectively and efficiently. The Department of Defense, through the Defense Information Systems Agency, is responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring the training meets its objectives and provides good value.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-computer-related-services, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $43.7 million to FOUR LLC. TRAINING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FOUR LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $43.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-06-24. End: 2024-06-23.

What specific IT skills are being trained, and how do they align with current and future DoD needs?

The provided data does not specify the exact IT skills covered by the training. A thorough review would require access to the contract's statement of work. Understanding the curriculum's relevance to emerging threats, new technologies like AI, and critical infrastructure protection is essential for assessing its long-term value and effectiveness in meeting evolving defense requirements.

How was the 'fair and reasonable' price determined for this $43.7M contract, especially given the competition method?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method suggests a competitive process was employed, but potentially with initial limitations. Determining price reasonableness typically involves comparing offers against historical prices, independent cost estimates, or market research. Without detailed pricing data and the specific reasons for source exclusion, it's difficult to definitively assess if the $43.7M represents a fair price or if further negotiation could have yielded better value.

What mechanisms are in place to measure the effectiveness and impact of this training on DoD personnel and mission readiness?

The contract details lack explicit performance metrics or quality assurance provisions for measuring training effectiveness. Robust oversight should include post-training assessments, feedback mechanisms from trainees and supervisors, and tracking of skill application in operational environments. Without these, it's challenging to quantify the return on investment and ensure the training directly contributes to improved mission readiness and cybersecurity posture.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2303 DULLES STATION BLVD STE 105, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $60,494,935

Exercised Options: $43,669,861

Current Obligation: $43,669,861

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NNG15SC73B

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-06-24

Current End Date: 2024-06-23

Potential End Date: 2025-06-23 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-01-23

More Contracts from Four LLC

View all Four LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending