DoD awards $16.6M Engineering Services contract to Peraton Inc. via full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,641,068 ($16.6M)
Contractor: Peraton Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-09-27
End Date: 2010-09-26
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)
Sector: Defense
Official Description: PWS 3 ONSITE, RDT&E FUNDS
Place of Performance
Location: ANNAPOLIS, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21402
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.6 million to PERATON INC. for work described as: PWS 3 ONSITE, RDT&E FUNDS Key points: 1. Contract awarded for RDT&E funds, indicating research, development, testing, and evaluation. 2. Peraton Inc. secured the award through a full and open competition. 3. The contract spans five years, from 2005 to 2010. 4. The NAICS code 541330 points to Engineering Services. 5. A significant portion of the contract value is represented by the 'br' field (9118).
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $16.6 million over five years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar engineering services contracts would be necessary to fully assess pricing fairness.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically promotes competitive pricing and allows all eligible vendors to participate. This method is expected to yield fair market prices.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better value for taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs.
Public Impact
Supports critical RDT&E activities within the Department of Defense. Ensures availability of specialized engineering services for defense projects. The five-year duration provides stability for long-term research and development efforts.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics or outcomes in the provided data.
- The 'br' value (9118) is unexplained and could represent a significant cost driver or benchmark.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing process.
- Contract supports essential RDT&E functions for the Department of Defense.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Engineering Services, a sector crucial for supporting complex government projects, particularly in defense. Spending benchmarks for this sector vary widely based on project scope and specialization.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific provisions or awards made to small businesses under this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was made by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), a component of the Department of Defense, suggesting established oversight mechanisms are in place.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Information Systems Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Unclear meaning of 'br' value.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics.
- Limited insight into specific RDT&E project scope.
- No information on small business subcontracting.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.6 million to PERATON INC.. PWS 3 ONSITE, RDT&E FUNDS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PERATON INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-09-27. End: 2010-09-26.
What specific RDT&E activities does this contract support, and how do they align with current defense priorities?
The provided data lacks specifics on the RDT&E activities. To assess alignment, one would need to review the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and compare the contract's objectives with the Department of Defense's strategic goals and current technological development roadmaps.
What is the significance of the 'br' value (9118) and how does it impact the overall cost-effectiveness of the contract?
The 'br' value of 9118 is not defined in the provided data and its meaning is unclear. Without clarification, it's impossible to determine its impact on cost-effectiveness. It could represent a benchmark, a specific cost component, or an internal metric requiring further investigation.
How does Peraton Inc.'s past performance and technical capability compare to other potential bidders in this full and open competition?
The data indicates a full and open competition, implying multiple bids were likely considered. However, specific details on Peraton's comparative performance or technical qualifications against competitors are not provided. A review of the source selection decision document would be necessary to understand this aspect.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: ITT Corporation
Address: 2560 HUNTINGTON AVE 200, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22303
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $36,899,177
Exercised Options: $36,899,177
Current Obligation: $16,641,068
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F0190L
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-09-27
Current End Date: 2010-09-26
Potential End Date: 2010-09-26 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-07-28
More Contracts from Peraton Inc.
- 200107!000034!5700!GZ80 !smc/Pks !F0470101C0001 !A!N!*!Y! !20001103!20061031!052819732!052819732!001216845!n!itt Industries, Inc , Systems !4410 E Fountain Blvd !colorado Sprin !co!80916!16000!041!08!colorado Springs !EL Paso !colorado !+000016429445!n!n!000000000000!ac26!rdte/Missile and Space Systems-Mgmt Support !A2 !missile and Space Systems !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!B! !A !Y!R!2!003!B! !A!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $1.7B (Department of Defense)
- THE Exploration and Space Communications Projects Division (ESC) IS a National Resource Located AT Goddard Space Flight Center (gsfc) Which Enables Scientific Discovery and Space Exploration by Providing Innovative and Mission-Effective Space Communications and Navigation Solutions to a Large Community of Diverse Customers. ESC Manages Operational Geostationary Communications Relay Satellites and Ground Systems for the Space Communications and Navigation (scan) Program AT Nasa Headquarters. Today, Scan Network Systems Consist of the Space Network (SN), the Near Earth Network (NEN), and the Deep Space Network (DSN). the Day-To-Day Management of These Three Networks IS Currently NOT Fully Consistent. IT IS the Intention of the Government to Unify the SN and NEN Where Practicable Under This Contract Using Integrated, Common Management Practices and Network Solutions — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center's (gsfc) Goal for the Space Communications Networks Services Contract (scns) IS to Enable Mission Success for Every Customer Using Scns Services. KEY Objectives of the Scns Contract ARE to Decrease Cost and Maintain or Improve Operational Efficiency and Reliability, While Maintaining an Acceptable Level of Risk and Providing for Safe Operation of the Missions. the Contractor Shall Implement a Safety, Health, and Mission Assurance Program That Provides a Safe and Healthy Work Environment, Minimizes Program Risk, and Maximizes Nasa Mission Success. the Contractor Shall BE Responsible and Accountable for Achieving the Required Results. Core Requirement Functions, Such AS Configuration Management, Quality Assurance, ETC. ARE Required to Support Idiq Task Orders. the Space Network (SN) IS Comprised of a Fleet of On-Orbit Tracking and Data Relay Satellites (tdrs) and Associated Ground Systems That Provide Telecommunications Services. the Nature of the SN Architecture, I.E., Extremely Large Capital Investment, Contractor Operated Facilities, Continuous 24X7 Requirements, ETC., Lends Itself to a Core Requirements Approach. the Ground Network (GN) Consists of an Orbital Tracking Network and the Satellite Laser Ranging Network. the Nature of the Ground Network Architecture, I.E., Diverse MIX of Commercial and Government Assets, Evolving Geographic and Technical Customer Requirements, and Legacy Systems, ETC. Lends Itself to an Idiq Approach. Other Activities, I.E., Very Long Baseline Interferometry Network Operations and Maintenance (O&M), Electronic System Test Laboratory, Requirements Development, Hardware and Software Development, ETC. ARE Best Suited to an Idiq Approach in the Resource-Constrained Environment That Nasa Operates in — $1.2B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Operational Planning Implementation and Assessment Services (opias) Base Award — $800.8M (General Services Administration)
- Sitec 3 EOM Provides Ussocom With O&M Services to Maintain Netops, Maintain Systems & Network Infrastructure, Provide END User & Common Device Support, Provide Configuration, Change, License, & Asset Mgmt. Conduct Training and Perform Imacs Services — $651.0M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)