DoD awards $10.6M for Oracle support, with 3 bidders and a 5-year term

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,645,352 ($10.6M)

Contractor: Affigent, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-01-31

End Date: 2027-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,826 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: PREMIUM ONSITE ORACLE SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: CHAMBERSBURG, FRANKLIN County, PENNSYLVANIA, 17201

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.6 million to AFFIGENT, LLC for work described as: PREMIUM ONSITE ORACLE SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and specialized nature of Oracle support. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Performance period extends over five years, indicating a long-term need. 5. The contract is categorized under 'Other Computer Related Services', a broad but relevant classification. 6. The award was a delivery order, suggesting it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $10.6 million over five years averages to approximately $2.1 million annually. Benchmarking against similar premium onsite Oracle support contracts is challenging without more specific service details. However, the fixed-price nature suggests the government has negotiated a set rate, which is generally favorable. The presence of multiple bidders in a full and open competition also supports the likelihood of a fair market price being established.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. With three bidders participating, the competition level suggests a moderately competitive environment for this specialized IT service. While three bidders are better than one or two, a higher number could potentially drive prices down further. However, the fixed-price structure likely provides a degree of cost certainty.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition with multiple bidders is beneficial for taxpayers, as it increases the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and ensures that the government is not locked into a single provider, fostering better value.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from continuous and expert support for its Oracle systems. Essential IT infrastructure and database management services are delivered. The primary geographic impact is within Pennsylvania, where the contractor is located. The contract supports specialized IT roles, potentially impacting the workforce in computer systems design and related services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if this is a sole-source follow-on without adequate competition.
Risk of scope creep if the 'PREMIUM ONSITE ORACLE SUPPORT' is not clearly defined.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical Oracle support could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
Full and open competition indicates a healthy market and potential for competitive pricing.
Long contract duration (5 years) suggests a stable and ongoing need, allowing for focused support.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on specialized database support. The market for premium IT support, particularly for enterprise software like Oracle, is significant. Companies like Affigent, LLC operate in a space that requires deep technical expertise. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within broader IT services categories, but the niche nature of premium Oracle support makes direct comparisons difficult without more granular data.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a delivery order under a larger contract, subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist, but are not explicitly detailed in this award notice. The primary contractor, Affigent, LLC, is likely a small business itself based on its size, but the contract award itself does not appear to be a small business set-aside.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) and the Department of Defense's contracting officers. The fixed-price nature provides some inherent oversight by limiting the government's financial exposure. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Oracle Database Software
IT Professional Services
Cloud Computing Services
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Support
Defense Information Technology Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for undefined scope creep in 'premium onsite support'.
Long-term contract duration may not align with rapidly evolving technology.
Dependence on a single vendor for critical support.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.6 million to AFFIGENT, LLC. PREMIUM ONSITE ORACLE SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AFFIGENT, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-01-31. End: 2027-01-31.

What specific Oracle products and versions are covered under this 'PREMIUM ONSITE ORACLE SUPPORT' contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact Oracle products or versions covered. 'PREMIUM ONSITE ORACLE SUPPORT' is a general description. Typically, such contracts would encompass support for Oracle Database, Oracle Middleware, and potentially other Oracle enterprise applications. The specific versions are crucial for understanding the technical scope and potential risks associated with supporting legacy versus current systems. Further details would likely be found in the contract's statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS), which are not included in this summary data.

How does the $10.6 million contract value compare to similar premium Oracle support contracts awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies?

Directly comparing the $10.6 million value requires access to detailed contract data for similar 'premium onsite Oracle support' services, including the scope of work, duration, and specific Oracle products supported. However, given the 5-year duration (1826 days), the average annual cost is approximately $2.1 million. This figure needs to be assessed against the complexity and criticality of the supported systems. The fact that it was competed under 'full and open' with three bidders suggests market validation, but without specific benchmarks, it's difficult to definitively state if it represents excellent or merely fair value. Premium, specialized IT support often commands higher prices due to the required expertise.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. These critical elements would typically be detailed in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW) attached to the contract. For premium IT support, common SLAs might include response times for critical issues, resolution times, system uptime guarantees, and availability of expert personnel. The absence of this information in the summary prevents a thorough assessment of performance expectations and accountability.

What is Affigent, LLC's track record with providing premium onsite Oracle support to the federal government?

Information regarding Affigent, LLC's specific track record for 'PREMIUM ONSITE ORACLE SUPPORT' is not detailed in the provided data. While the award itself indicates they were selected for this contract, their past performance history, client satisfaction ratings, and experience with similar federal contracts would be crucial for a complete assessment. Agencies typically review past performance evaluations during the solicitation process. Without access to these evaluations or a broader contract history for Affigent, LLC, their specific track record remains unverified by this summary.

What is the historical spending trend for 'PREMIUM ONSITE ORACLE SUPPORT' by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)?

The provided data only pertains to this single $10.6 million award. To analyze historical spending trends for 'PREMIUM ONSITE ORACLE SUPPORT' by DISA, one would need to query federal procurement databases (like FPDS or USASpending) for all contracts categorized under similar service descriptions (e.g., Oracle support, IT professional services, database administration) awarded by DISA over several fiscal years. This would reveal patterns in spending volume, average contract values, and the number of awarded contracts over time, indicating whether spending in this area is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable.

Are there any identified risks associated with the contractor (Affigent, LLC) or the nature of the services provided?

The provided data does not explicitly list risks associated with Affigent, LLC or the services. However, general risks for such contracts include potential performance deficiencies, reliance on key personnel, cybersecurity vulnerabilities if support involves system access, and the possibility of cost increases if the contract isn't strictly fixed-price or if scope creep occurs. The long duration (5 years) also presents a risk of the technology or requirements evolving beyond the contract's scope. A thorough risk assessment would require reviewing the contract's PWS, past performance reports, and any specific clauses related to risk mitigation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Nana Regional Corporation, Inc.

Address: 2553 DULLES VIEW DR, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $31,550,640

Exercised Options: $11,335,536

Current Obligation: $10,645,352

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NNG15SC24B

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline