HII Mission Technologies Corp awarded $29.3M for management consulting services by U.S. Special Operations Command

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,283,946 ($29.3M)

Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2018-06-14

End Date: 2022-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,508 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: J2 SCA/PAS AWARD

Place of Performance

Location: TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH County, FLORIDA, 33621

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.3 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: J2 SCA/PAS AWARD Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks if not managed diligently. 3. Awarded by U.S. Special Operations Command, indicating a focus on specialized defense support. 4. The duration of the contract (1508 days) suggests a long-term need for these services. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to management consulting services. 6. The contract was issued as a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value for this specific contract is challenging without access to the full contract details and the scope of services. However, the award amount of approximately $29.3 million over roughly four years for management consulting services to a specialized agency like U.S. Special Operations Command is within a plausible range for such support. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing model, while common, requires careful oversight to ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent scope creep, which could inflate the overall value proposition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a 'full and open competition' procurement method. This indicates that the solicitation was made available to all responsible sources, and all responsible offerors were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific award, which is generally positive for price discovery and value.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with a limited number of bidders, generally provides a better opportunity for taxpayers to receive competitive pricing compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely U.S. Special Operations Command personnel and operations, receiving enhanced management and administrative support. Services delivered include administrative management and general management consulting, aimed at improving operational efficiency and strategic planning. The geographic impact is primarily within the operational areas of U.S. Special Operations Command, with a stated performance location in Florida. Workforce implications may include the utilization of specialized consultants to augment government staff, potentially leading to improved project outcomes and knowledge transfer.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials (T&M) contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored for scope and efficiency.
Limited number of bidders (2) may indicate potential barriers to entry or a niche market, potentially impacting long-term competition.
The specific nature of services for U.S. Special Operations Command might involve sensitive or complex requirements, increasing inherent program risk.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, ensuring a broad base of potential offerors.
Contract awarded to HII Mission Technologies Corp, a known entity in the defense contracting space, suggesting established capabilities.
The contract duration indicates a sustained need and potential for stable support to the agency.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions. The market for management consulting services to defense agencies is substantial, characterized by specialized firms capable of addressing complex operational and strategic challenges. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other contracts for similar services awarded to defense entities, considering factors like agency size, scope of work, and contract duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor, HII Mission Technologies Corp, may engage small businesses as subcontractors if it aligns with their subcontracting plan and the needs of the contract, but this is not mandated by a set-aside provision.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the U.S. Special Operations Command's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be embedded within the contract's performance work statement, requiring adherence to defined deliverables and service levels. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS-NG, where basic award information is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract arise.

Related Government Programs

Management and Consulting Services
Defense Support Services
Special Operations Support
Administrative Support Contracts
Professional Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing model.
Limited competition (2 bidders) may reduce price discovery and long-term market competitiveness.
Contract performance requires close monitoring to ensure scope adherence and efficiency.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.3 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. J2 SCA/PAS AWARD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-06-14. End: 2022-07-31.

What is the track record of HII Mission Technologies Corp in delivering similar management consulting services to federal agencies, particularly within the defense sector?

HII Mission Technologies Corp, a subsidiary of Huntington Ingalls Industries, has a significant presence in the federal contracting landscape, particularly within defense and intelligence sectors. They offer a broad range of services including mission engineering, cyber, and information technology, which often intersect with management and strategic consulting. While specific details on their past performance for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611) for U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) would require deeper analysis of contract histories and performance reviews, HII's overall portfolio suggests substantial experience in supporting complex government operations. Their track record generally indicates a capacity to handle large-scale, critical support functions, though the effectiveness and value-for-money of specific engagements can vary and are subject to agency-specific evaluations and oversight.

How does the awarded amount of $29.3 million compare to other similar management consulting contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or USSOCOM?

Comparing the $29.3 million award for management consulting services requires context regarding the scope, duration, and specific requirements of the contract. This award spans approximately 1508 days (over 4 years), making the average annual value around $7.3 million. This figure is within a reasonable range for specialized management consulting support to a major defense agency like USSOCOM. Larger, more comprehensive consulting engagements for defense entities can easily reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Conversely, smaller, more focused consulting tasks might be in the low millions. Without a detailed scope of work, it's difficult to provide a precise benchmark, but the award appears to be a substantial, long-term engagement rather than a minor task order.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for management consulting services, and how might they be mitigated?

The primary risk with Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like this one, is the potential for cost overruns. Because the contractor is reimbursed for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the cost of materials, there is less inherent incentive for efficiency compared to fixed-price contracts. This can lead to scope creep, extended timelines, and ultimately, higher costs than initially anticipated. Mitigation strategies employed by the government include robust oversight, detailed monitoring of labor hours and material costs, clear definition and enforcement of the scope of work, and potentially incorporating cost-ceiling provisions or award-fee structures that incentivize performance and cost control. Regular progress reviews and performance metrics are crucial for managing T&M contracts effectively.

Given the 'full and open competition' and only two bidders, what does this suggest about the market for these specific consulting services for USSOCOM?

A 'full and open competition' with only two bidders for this specific management consulting contract suggests a potentially specialized or niche market for services tailored to U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). While 'full and open' implies the solicitation was widely advertised, the low number of bids could indicate several factors: high barriers to entry (e.g., security clearances, specialized expertise, past performance requirements), a limited number of qualified contractors capable of meeting USSOCOM's unique needs, or perhaps that the contract's value or scope, while significant, was not attractive enough to draw a larger pool of competitors. This level of competition might offer some price advantage over sole-source but could also limit the government's leverage in future procurements if the market remains constrained.

What is the historical spending pattern for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) by the Department of Defense and USSOCOM?

Historical spending on NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) by the Department of Defense (DoD) and specifically U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) is substantial. The DoD consistently ranks as one of the largest federal purchasers of management and consulting services, driven by the complexity of its operations, the need for strategic planning, organizational efficiency improvements, and specialized support. USSOCOM, as a distinct component within DoD, also procures these services to enhance its unique operational capabilities and support structures. Analyzing historical data from sources like FPDS-NG reveals consistent annual spending in the billions for the DoD across this category, with USSOCOM contributing a significant portion tailored to its specialized mission requirements. This indicates a sustained demand for such services within these organizations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: H9222214R0020

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc

Address: 6767 OLD MADISON PKE NW UNIT 670, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,043,374

Exercised Options: $30,043,374

Current Obligation: $29,283,946

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: H9222216D0039

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline