GSA's $28.3M elevator maintenance contract with KONE Inc. awarded in 2000, spanning over 7 years
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $28,306,437 ($28.3M)
Contractor: Kone Inc
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2000-01-15
End Date: 2011-09-30
Contract Duration: 4,276 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT
Sector: Other
Official Description: ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
Place of Performance
Location: KANSAS CITY, JACKSON County, MISSOURI, 64131
State: Missouri Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $28.3 million to KONE INC for work described as: ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE Key points: 1. Contract value of $28.3 million over its lifespan suggests significant investment in building infrastructure. 2. The use of 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' indicates a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. A long contract duration of over 7 years may present risks related to evolving technology and market prices. 4. The contract type 'FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT' aims to balance cost certainty with market fluctuations. 5. Awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), this contract falls under the Public Buildings Service, managing federal building assets. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 238290 points to a specialized market of building equipment contractors.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $28.3 million over approximately 7.5 years averages to about $3.77 million annually. Without specific details on the number of elevators maintained or the scope of services, a direct per-unit cost comparison is difficult. However, for a contract of this duration and scale, the pricing would need to be benchmarked against similar large-scale elevator maintenance contracts managed by GSA or other federal agencies to assess value for money. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment structure suggests an attempt to manage costs, but the effectiveness depends on the specific adjustment clauses.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' suggesting that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 4 bids indicates a degree of competition. However, the number of bidders (4) for a contract of this size and duration might be on the lower side, potentially limiting the full benefits of price discovery that a larger pool of bidders could offer. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the competition was robust enough to drive optimal pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: A fully and openly competed contract generally offers better value to taxpayers by fostering competition that can drive down prices and improve service quality. While 4 bidders is a moderate level of competition, it is preferable to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.
Public Impact
Federal employees and visitors benefit from reliable elevator operations in federally managed buildings. Ensures the continued functionality and safety of critical building infrastructure within the General Services Administration's portfolio. The contract supports jobs within the elevator maintenance and repair industry, likely concentrated in the Missouri region where the contract was managed. Maintains accessibility for individuals with disabilities in federal facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (over 7 years) may lead to outdated technology or service agreements.
- Economic price adjustment clauses can introduce cost unpredictability if not carefully managed.
- Limited number of bidders (4) might indicate potential barriers to entry or insufficient market outreach.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent process.
- Fixed-price elements provide some cost control for the government.
- Contract managed by GSA, an agency with significant experience in federal procurement and facility management.
Sector Analysis
The elevator maintenance sector is a specialized segment of the broader building equipment and services industry. This contract falls under 'Other Building Equipment Contractors' (NAICS 238290). The market is characterized by established players, significant technical expertise requirements, and varying contract structures from routine maintenance to full service agreements. GSA, as a major property manager, represents a substantial customer base for such services, and its procurement practices significantly influence market dynamics.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract ('sb': false). There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without this data, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem, though large prime contracts often have indirect benefits through supply chains if small businesses are engaged by the prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and contract administration. The Public Buildings Service (PBS) within GSA is responsible for managing federal buildings and ensuring compliance. Inspector General audits and performance reviews are common oversight tools for such contracts to ensure accountability and transparency, although specific IG involvement for this particular contract is not detailed here.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
- GSA Facility Management Services
- Elevator and Escalator Maintenance Services
- Public Buildings Service Contracts
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration
- Economic price adjustment clause
- Moderate number of bidders
Tags
elevator-maintenance, general-services-administration, public-buildings-service, fixed-price-economic-price-adjustment, full-and-open-competition, building-equipment-contractors, missouri, large-contract, federal-facilities, infrastructure-maintenance
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $28.3 million to KONE INC. ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KONE INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2000-01-15. End: 2011-09-30.
What was the specific scope of services included in this elevator maintenance contract?
The provided data indicates the contract was for 'ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE' (d: ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE) awarded to KONE INC. However, the specific scope of services is not detailed. Typically, elevator maintenance contracts can range from basic preventative maintenance (inspections, lubrication, minor adjustments) to comprehensive service agreements that include emergency repairs, parts replacement, and modernization. The contract type, 'FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT' (pt: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT), suggests a base service level with provisions for adjusting costs based on economic factors, implying a defined scope that is subject to price changes.
How does the annual cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for elevator maintenance?
The contract's total value was $28,306,437.30 (a: 28306437.3) over a duration of 4276 days (dur: 4276), which is approximately 11.7 years (though the award and end dates suggest closer to 9.5 years). This averages to roughly $3.05 million per year. Benchmarking this requires detailed information on the number and type of elevators, geographic locations, and the specific service levels (e.g., preventative vs. full service). Without these specifics, a direct comparison is challenging. However, for a large portfolio of elevators managed by GSA, this annual figure might be within a reasonable range, assuming a significant number of units are covered. Industry reports or GSA's own internal benchmarks would be necessary for a precise comparison.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate KONE INC.'s performance under this contract?
The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used for evaluating KONE INC.'s performance. Federal contracts, especially those managed by GSA, typically include performance standards related to response times for service calls, equipment uptime, preventative maintenance completion rates, and customer satisfaction. These KPIs are crucial for ensuring the reliability and safety of the elevators. The contract's success would be measured against these predefined metrics, potentially impacting future contract awards or renewals.
What is the historical spending trend for elevator maintenance services by the General Services Administration?
The provided data pertains to a single contract awarded in 2000. To understand historical spending trends for elevator maintenance by GSA, a broader analysis of GSA's procurement data over multiple years would be required. This would involve aggregating spending across all similar contracts (NAICS 238290, relevant PSC codes) awarded by GSA's Public Buildings Service and other relevant entities. Such an analysis would reveal patterns in contract values, durations, competition levels, and contractor performance over time, highlighting any increases or decreases in investment in this service category.
Were there any significant contract modifications or change orders issued during the life of this contract?
The provided data summary does not include information on contract modifications or change orders. For a contract spanning nearly a decade (aw: 2000-01-15, ed: 2011-09-30), it is common for modifications to occur due to changes in requirements, scope adjustments, or economic price escalations. Analyzing these modifications would provide insight into how the contract evolved, potential cost impacts, and the flexibility of the contracting process. Accessing the contract's official modification history would be necessary to answer this question.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Building Equipment Contractors › Other Building Equipment Contractors
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Kone S.A. (UEI: 459906942)
Address: ONE KONE COURT, MOLINE, IL, 17
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,306,437
Exercised Options: $28,306,437
Current Obligation: $28,306,437
Timeline
Start Date: 2000-01-15
Current End Date: 2011-09-30
Potential End Date: 2011-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-08-31
More Contracts from Kone Inc
- Elevator Modernization of Passenger Elevators AT the Fort Lauderdale Federal Courthouse in Fort Lauderdale FL — $2.6M (General Services Administration)
- Elevator Preventive Maintenance and Repair West Haven, CT — $2.6M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Elevator Modernizations AT James L King Cths, Miami, FL - Fl0517zz — $2.3M (General Services Administration)
- Elevator Maintenance/Inspection for Puget Sound Health Care System — $2.1M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- ST Louis Vamc JC Division Elevator Maint — $958.3K (Department of Veterans Affairs)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)