GSA Awards $106.6M for PM RADAR Program EA 3 to URS Federal Services, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $106,647,497 ($106.6M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2010-09-22

End Date: 2012-12-31

Contract Duration: 831 days

Daily Burn Rate: $128.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: PM RADAR PROGRAM EA 3

Place of Performance

Location: FORT MONMOUTH, MONMOUTH County, NEW JERSEY, 07703

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $106.6 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: PM RADAR PROGRAM EA 3 Key points: 1. Contract awarded to URS Federal Services, Inc. for $106.6M. 2. The contract is for Communication Equipment Repair and Maintenance (NAICS 811213). 3. Awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA). 4. Contract duration is from 2010-09-22 to 2012-12-31. 5. This was a Time and Materials contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's Time and Materials pricing structure, especially for a service like communication equipment repair, can lead to cost overruns if not strictly managed. Without a fixed price or cost ceiling, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts without more detailed cost breakdowns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This lack of competition limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government compared to a fully competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best possible value for the $106.6 million spent.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the lack of competitive bidding. The Time and Materials contract type poses a risk of uncontrolled spending. Essential communication equipment maintenance services were procured without exploring market competition. The contract duration of over two years suggests a significant reliance on the awarded vendor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Time and Materials pricing
Potential for cost overruns

Positive Signals

Essential service provision
Established vendor relationship

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the IT services sector, specifically focusing on repair and maintenance of communication equipment. Spending benchmarks for such services can vary widely based on equipment complexity and service level agreements, but competitive bidding typically drives costs down.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. The award to a large entity like URS Federal Services, Inc. suggests a focus on established, larger providers.

Oversight & Accountability

The lack of competition and the Time and Materials contract type warrant close oversight to ensure cost control and prevent potential waste, fraud, or abuse. Transparency in reporting expenditures is crucial.

Related Government Programs

Communication Equipment Repair and Maintenance
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competitive bidding
Time and Materials contract type
Potential for cost overruns
No indication of small business participation
Absence of performance metrics in data

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $106.6 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.. PM RADAR PROGRAM EA 3

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $106.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-22. End: 2012-12-31.

What was the justification for not competing this contract, and were alternative contract types considered to mitigate cost risks?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. Without further documentation, the specific justification remains unknown. However, sole-source awards typically require a compelling reason, such as unique capabilities or urgent needs. The choice of a Time and Materials contract, while flexible, inherently carries higher cost risk than fixed-price options, suggesting a potential trade-off between flexibility and cost control that warrants scrutiny.

How does the per-unit cost of communication equipment repair and maintenance under this contract compare to industry benchmarks or previous contracts?

Benchmarking the per-unit cost is challenging without specific details on the types of equipment repaired, the labor rates, and the complexity of the maintenance tasks performed. The Time and Materials structure means costs are directly tied to labor hours and material costs incurred. A thorough analysis would require access to the contract's detailed cost breakdown and comparison with similar government or commercial service contracts.

What was the overall effectiveness of the communication equipment repair and maintenance services provided by URS Federal Services, Inc. under this contract?

The effectiveness of the services is not detailed in the provided data. Key performance indicators (KPIs) and user feedback would be necessary to assess effectiveness. Factors like equipment uptime, response times for repairs, and overall system reliability would be critical metrics to evaluate the contractor's performance and the value delivered to the agency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Other Services (except Public Administration) › Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance › Communication Equipment Repair and Maintenance

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: 10RT0270

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 20501 SENECA MEADOWS PKWY STE 300, GERMANTOWN, MD, 06

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $106,647,497

Exercised Options: $106,647,497

Current Obligation: $106,647,497

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS08T10BPC0103

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline