GSA's $23M IT training contract for DAC McAlester awarded to SI International Engineering, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,068,523 ($23.1M)

Contractor: SI International Engineering, Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2008-08-01

End Date: 2012-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.8K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: IT TRAINING FOR DAC MCALESTER

Place of Performance

Location: MCALESTER, PITTSBURG County, OKLAHOMA, 74501

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $23.1 million to SI INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING, INC for work described as: IT TRAINING FOR DAC MCALESTER Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the duration and scope of IT training services. 2. Competition dynamics for this delivery order were not fully detailed, impacting price discovery assessment. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a 'Good' performance rating and 'OK' status. 4. The contract supported IT training needs for a specific military installation. 5. This falls within the broader IT services sector, specifically computer-related services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value of approximately $23 million over four years suggests a moderate annual spend for IT training. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT training contracts is challenging without more specific service details. However, the duration and the nature of specialized IT training for a defense entity indicate that the pricing is likely within a reasonable range for the services rendered. The performance rating of 'OK' suggests satisfactory delivery.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract type is listed as 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER,' which implies it was competed. However, the specific number of bidders or the details of the competitive process are not provided in the available data. This lack of detail makes it difficult to assess the extent of competition and its impact on achieving the best possible pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: When competition details are limited, taxpayers may not benefit from the most cost-effective pricing achievable through robust bidding processes.

Public Impact

Personnel at the Defense Ammunition Center (DAC) in McAlester, Oklahoma, benefited from enhanced IT skills. The services delivered were specialized IT training, crucial for maintaining operational readiness and efficiency. The geographic impact was concentrated at the DAC McAlester facility. The contract supported the technical workforce by providing necessary skill development.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed competition information hinders full assessment of value for money.
Performance rating of 'OK' suggests satisfactory but not exceptional performance, warranting continued monitoring.

Positive Signals

Contract was awarded competitively, indicating some level of market engagement.
The contractor, SI International Engineering, Inc., has a history of performing government contracts.
The contract duration allowed for sustained training delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically within the 'Other Computer Related Services' category (NAICS 541519). The IT services market is vast and highly competitive, encompassing a wide range of specialized services. Contracts for IT training are essential for government agencies to maintain a skilled workforce capable of managing and utilizing complex technological systems. Comparable spending benchmarks for IT training can vary significantly based on the specialization, duration, and number of personnel trained.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary focus was likely on obtaining the best value from the broader market. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. Without set-aside provisions, large prime contractors may have opportunities to subcontract, but this is not guaranteed or detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA), which awarded the contract through its Federal Acquisition Service. Specific oversight mechanisms, such as performance reviews, quality assurance checks, and payment audits, would be employed to ensure contractor compliance and service quality. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, but detailed operational oversight specifics are not publicly available.

Related Government Programs

IT Services
Professional Services
Defense Training
Government IT Contracts
NAICS 541519

Risk Flags

Limited competition details
Performance rating is 'OK', suggesting room for improvement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $23.1 million to SI INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING, INC. IT TRAINING FOR DAC MCALESTER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SI INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-08-01. End: 2012-07-31.

What was the specific nature of the IT training provided under this contract?

The contract data indicates 'IT TRAINING FOR DAC MCALESTER' and classifies the service under NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services.' While the exact curriculum is not detailed, this suggests specialized IT training tailored to the needs of the Defense Ammunition Center (DAC) at McAlester. This could encompass a range of topics such as software proficiency, network administration, cybersecurity awareness, data management, or specialized system training relevant to the DAC's mission. The 'Time and Materials' pricing structure implies that the contractor was reimbursed for direct labor hours and associated material costs, which is common for services where the scope can evolve or is difficult to define precisely upfront.

How does the contract's total value compare to similar IT training contracts for defense entities?

The total contract value of approximately $23 million over four years (2008-2012) represents a significant investment in IT training. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare it against contracts for similar defense installations or agencies requiring comparable levels of specialized IT training. Factors such as the number of personnel trained, the complexity of the IT systems involved, and the duration and frequency of training sessions are crucial. Without access to a comprehensive database of comparable defense IT training contracts, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. However, the duration and the specialized nature suggest the cost is likely commensurate with providing sustained, tailored training to a defense facility.

What are the key risk indicators associated with this contract?

The primary risk indicators available from the provided data are the performance rating ('OK') and the contract status ('OK'). A 'Good' performance rating suggests the contractor met expectations but did not necessarily exceed them significantly, implying a moderate level of performance risk. The 'OK' status indicates the contract is proceeding without major issues. The 'Time and Materials' pricing type can introduce cost risk if not managed carefully, as it allows for costs to fluctuate based on actual effort and materials. The lack of detailed competition information also presents a risk in fully assessing whether the government secured the best possible pricing and value.

What was the historical spending pattern for IT training at DAC McAlester prior to this contract?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for IT training at DAC McAlester prior to this contract (2008-2012). To analyze historical spending, one would need access to previous contract awards or budget allocations for IT training at this specific facility. Understanding past expenditures would allow for a comparison to assess whether the $23 million awarded over four years represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in IT training. This context is crucial for evaluating the long-term financial commitment and the evolution of IT training needs at the installation.

What is the track record of SI International Engineering, Inc. in delivering IT training services?

SI International Engineering, Inc. was the contractor for this IT training contract. While the provided data indicates a 'Good' performance rating for this specific contract, it does not offer a comprehensive overview of their broader track record in delivering IT training services. To assess their track record thoroughly, one would need to examine their performance on other government contracts, particularly those involving IT training or related professional services. Information on contract history, past performance evaluations, and any past performance issues or commendations would be necessary for a complete assessment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: MD218DAC2T5

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1615 S MURRAY BLVD, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO, 05

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,435,695

Exercised Options: $23,399,518

Current Obligation: $23,068,523

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS07T00BGD0039

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline