GSA's $29.8M MAX Application Support BPA Delivery Order to TCG Inc. for Publishing Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,817,307 ($29.8M)

Contractor: TCG Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2013-09-16

End Date: 2018-09-15

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: IGF::CL,CT::IGF OMB MAX APPLICATION SUPPORT UNDER FEDSIM BPA GSTFMG BPA-08-001OMB

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20503

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $29.8 million to TCG INC for work described as: IGF::CL,CT::IGF OMB MAX APPLICATION SUPPORT UNDER FEDSIM BPA GSTFMG BPA-08-001OMB Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the 5-year duration and the nature of IT support services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a single delivery order and a defined period of performance. 4. Performance context is within IT support for government applications, a common service area. 5. Sector positioning is within IT services, specifically supporting publishing and information management systems.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total value of $29.8 million over five years averages to approximately $5.96 million per year. This figure needs to be benchmarked against similar IT support contracts for government applications. Without specific details on the services rendered, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the duration and the nature of the services suggest a potentially reasonable cost if performance was satisfactory.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This typically leads to more competitive pricing as vendors vie for the contract. The presence of a single delivery order suggests that TCG Inc. was selected from a pool of qualified bidders through a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces, ensuring the government receives services at a competitive rate.

Public Impact

Federal agencies utilizing the MAX application likely benefited from continued support and maintenance of the system. The services delivered were related to IT support, specifically for publishing and information management. The geographic impact was concentrated in the District of Columbia, where the contract was managed. Workforce implications would primarily affect TCG Inc.'s employees assigned to this contract.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the quality of support provided.
The 'All Other Publishers' NAICS code is broad and may not fully capture the IT-specific nature of the support.
Limited information on the specific tasks performed under the delivery order.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
A defined period of performance (5 years) provides clarity on the contract's duration.
The contract was managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), a central procurement agency.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader IT services sector, specifically supporting government applications. The market for IT support and application maintenance is substantial, with numerous vendors offering specialized services. Benchmarking this spending against similar IT support contracts for federal agencies would provide further context on its scale and competitiveness.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officers at the General Services Administration (GSA). As a delivery order under a BPA, the underlying BPA likely had established oversight mechanisms. Transparency is moderate, with basic award details available, but specific performance and financial reporting are not publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Supply Schedule Contracts
IT Professional Services
Application Maintenance and Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics.
Broad NAICS code may obscure specific IT services.
Limited public information on specific tasks performed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $29.8 million to TCG INC. IGF::CL,CT::IGF OMB MAX APPLICATION SUPPORT UNDER FEDSIM BPA GSTFMG BPA-08-001OMB

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TCG INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-09-16. End: 2018-09-15.

What specific services did TCG Inc. provide under this delivery order for MAX application support?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'OMB MAX APPLICATION SUPPORT UNDER FEDSIM BPA GSTFMG BPA-08-001OMB' and falls under NAICS code 511199 (All Other Publishers). While the NAICS code suggests publishing-related activities, the contract title points towards IT support for the MAX application. This likely encompassed services such as application maintenance, bug fixing, user support, system updates, and potentially minor enhancements or configuration changes to the MAX application. The 'Time and Materials' contract type suggests that labor hours and direct costs were billed, common for IT support where the scope can evolve.

How does the $29.8 million contract value compare to similar IT support contracts for federal applications?

Benchmarking the $29.8 million contract value requires comparison with similar IT support and application maintenance contracts awarded by federal agencies over a comparable period (five years). Without access to a comprehensive database of federal IT spending with detailed service descriptions, a direct comparison is difficult. However, for a five-year contract supporting a critical government application, this value is within a plausible range, especially if it involved a dedicated team and comprehensive support. Agencies often spend millions annually on maintaining and supporting their core IT systems.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) for this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. Typically, IT support contracts, especially those managed by GSA, would have defined SLAs related to response times for issues, resolution times, system availability, and user satisfaction. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it challenging to quantitatively assess the contractor's performance and the overall effectiveness of the support provided.

What is the significance of the 'Full and Open Competition' award type for this contract?

The 'Full and Open Competition' award type signifies that the General Services Administration (GSA) solicited bids from all responsible sources capable of meeting the requirements. This process is designed to maximize competition, leading to potentially better pricing and a wider selection of qualified vendors. For taxpayers, this means the government likely secured the services at a competitive market rate, as TCG Inc. would have had to offer a compelling proposal to win the contract against other interested parties.

What is the historical spending pattern for MAX application support or similar services by the General Services Administration?

The provided data only details a single delivery order valued at $29.8 million over five years. To understand historical spending patterns, one would need to examine GSA's procurement history for the MAX application specifically, or for similar IT support services under the FedSim BPA or other relevant contract vehicles. This would involve looking at previous awards, contract durations, values, and the contractors involved. Without this broader historical context, it's difficult to ascertain trends or significant shifts in GSA's spending on such services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Information › Newspaper, Periodical, Book, and Directory Publishers › All Other Publishers

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID05130080

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7348 GEORGIA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20012

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Subchapter S Corporation

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $100,200,617

Exercised Options: $29,817,307

Current Obligation: $29,817,307

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 11

Total Subaward Amount: $1,373,532

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F0034P

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline