GSA's $28M Northrop Grumman Contract for Equipment Repair Data Migration Support Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,079,837 ($28.1M)

Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2012-08-18

End Date: 2016-11-04

Contract Duration: 1,539 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: EQUIPMENT REPAIR SYSTEMS DATA MIGRATION PREPARATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOLLOW ON

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $28.1 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: EQUIPMENT REPAIR SYSTEMS DATA MIGRATION PREPARATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOLLOW ON Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation for $28.1M. 2. Services fall under Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting. 3. Full and open competition was utilized. 4. Contract duration was 1539 days. 5. No small business participation noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded on a Time and Materials basis, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The duration of nearly four years suggests a potentially complex or ongoing need for these services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a broad search for qualified vendors. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure may limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for consulting services related to data migration and equipment repair support. The Time and Materials nature of the contract warrants careful oversight to ensure cost-effectiveness.

Public Impact

Ensures continuity of essential equipment repair systems. Supports modernization efforts through data migration. Potential for improved operational efficiency in logistics. Government reliance on a single contractor for a significant period.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically logistics consulting. Benchmarks for similar data migration and support services can vary widely based on complexity and duration, but a $28M spend over four years suggests a substantial undertaking.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates no small business participation. This suggests that the prime contractor, Northrop Grumman, likely performed all work or subcontracted to large businesses, missing opportunities to engage smaller, specialized firms.

Oversight & Accountability

The use of Time and Materials pricing necessitates robust oversight from the General Services Administration to monitor hours, rates, and the necessity of services to prevent cost creep and ensure value for taxpayer money.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

process-physical-distribution-and-logist, general-services-administration, oh, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $28.1 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. EQUIPMENT REPAIR SYSTEMS DATA MIGRATION PREPARATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOLLOW ON

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-08-18. End: 2016-11-04.

What was the specific nature of the 'equipment repair systems data migration preparation' and how did the Time and Materials contract structure ensure cost-effectiveness for this complex task?

The data migration likely involved transferring critical information from legacy systems to newer platforms to support equipment repair operations. The Time and Materials (T&M) structure, while offering flexibility, requires stringent oversight. Agencies must meticulously track labor hours, verify the necessity of each task, and ensure billing rates are fair. Without this diligence, T&M contracts can exceed initial estimates significantly, potentially leading to poor value for the government.

Given the full and open competition, why did this substantial contract not include provisions for small business subcontracting, and what is the potential impact on innovation and competition?

The absence of small business participation might stem from the prime contractor's established relationships or the perceived complexity of the work, leading them to rely on their own resources or other large firms. This oversight misses opportunities to leverage the agility and specialized expertise of small businesses, potentially limiting innovation and reducing the competitive landscape for future similar contracts.

With a contract duration of 1539 days (over 4 years), what mechanisms were in place to ensure the services remained relevant and effective, and to prevent vendor lock-in or scope creep?

Long-term contracts require built-in flexibility and regular performance reviews. Mechanisms like phased delivery, clear performance metrics, and periodic re-evaluation of needs are crucial. The government should have had provisions for contract modifications or termination if the services became obsolete or less effective. Preventing vendor lock-in involves ensuring clear deliverables and potentially encouraging knowledge transfer to government personnel.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesProcess, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID05120102

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation

Address: 4807 STONECROFT BLVD, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $47,267,322

Exercised Options: $36,302,704

Current Obligation: $28,079,837

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0162L

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-08-18

Current End Date: 2016-11-04

Potential End Date: 2016-11-04 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-01-17

More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending