GSA awards $32.7M for enterprise SharePoint collaboration solution and support to INFOliance LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,764,088 ($32.8M)

Contractor: Inforeliance LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2008-02-01

End Date: 2010-01-31

Contract Duration: 730 days

Daily Burn Rate: $44.9K/day

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: IT

Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES NECESSARY TO: PROVIDE PROJECT MANAGEMENT OF ENTERPRISE STRATEGY CONSULTING AND SOLUTION CONFIGURATION. MANAGE DEPLOYMENT, APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT, MIGRATION AND SUPPORT. CONFIGURE AN ENTERPRISE SHAREPOINT COLLABORATION SOLUTION WHICH SUPPORTS AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR) OPERATIONS. DEPLOY ENTERPRISE SHAREPOINT COLLABORATION SOLUTION TO THE USCENTAF AOR SITES AND CONUS WING LOCATIONS. MIGRATE LEGACY APPLICATIONS TO THE ENTERPRISE SHAREPOINT COLLABORATION SOLUTION. DEVELOP NEW APPLICATIONS TO BE INTEGRATED INTO THE ENTERPRISE SHAREPOINT COLLABORATION SOLUTION. PROVIDE ENTERPRISE SHAREPOINT COLLABORATION SOLUTION AND APPLICATION SUPPORT. PROVIDE MICROSOFT PREMIER SUPPORT SERVICES. USCENTAF WILL PROVIDE KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND SIGN-OFF ABOUT IT REQUIREMENTS AND INITIATIVES, CANDIDATE PROJECTS, AND BUSINESS PROCESSES. SERVICES WILL BE PERFORMED AT SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, CONTRACTOR FACILITIES AND DEPLOYED AOR SITES AS AGREED TO BY USCENTAF AND CONTRACTOR.

Place of Performance

Location: SHAW AFB, SUMTER County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29152

State: South Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $32.8 million to INFORELIANCE LLC for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES NECESSARY TO: PROVIDE PROJECT MANAGEMENT OF ENTERPRISE STRATEGY CONSULTING AND SOLUTION CONFIGURATION. MANAGE DEPLOYMENT, APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT, MIGRATION AND SUPPORT. CONFIGURE AN ENTERPRISE SHAREPOINT COLLABORATION S… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on project management, application development, migration, and support for a SharePoint collaboration solution. 2. Services span deployment across USCENTAF AOR sites and CONUS wing locations. 3. Includes migration of legacy applications and development of new integrated applications. 4. Microsoft Premier Support services are also included. 5. Contract duration is 730 days. 6. The contract was awarded under the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total contract value is $32.7 million over two years. Without specific details on the scope of work, number of users, or complexity of the SharePoint configuration and application development, it is difficult to definitively benchmark the value. However, the average annual cost is approximately $16.35 million, which appears substantial for IT consulting and development services. Further analysis would require comparing this to similar large-scale enterprise SharePoint deployments and custom application development projects.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The provided data does not specify the competition level for this contract. It is unclear if it was competed under full and open competition, a limited competition, or awarded as a sole-source contract. The number of bidders and the procurement method significantly impact price discovery and the potential for achieving best value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly affects taxpayer value. Robust competition typically drives down prices and encourages innovation, leading to more cost-effective solutions. Limited or sole-source awards may result in higher costs if adequate justification and price negotiation are not rigorously applied.

Public Impact

USCENTAF operations and personnel benefit from an enhanced collaboration and information sharing platform. Provides technical consulting services for project management, application development, and system deployment. Geographic impact includes deployment to USCENTAF Area of Responsibility (AOR) sites and CONUS wing locations. Workforce implications include the need for personnel to manage, develop, migrate, and support the new SharePoint solution.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of transparency regarding the competition method makes it difficult to assess if taxpayers received the best possible value.
The substantial contract value warrants close scrutiny of performance and deliverables to ensure effective use of funds.
Potential for scope creep or cost overruns if project management is not exceptionally strong.

Positive Signals

Contract addresses critical operational needs for USCENTAF through a modern collaboration platform.
Includes comprehensive support services, such as Microsoft Premier Support, indicating a commitment to system reliability.
The scope covers migration of legacy systems, suggesting an effort to modernize IT infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) services sector, specifically focusing on custom computer programming and IT consulting. The market for enterprise collaboration solutions like SharePoint is significant, with numerous vendors offering development, configuration, and support services. The value of this contract, at $32.7 million, positions it as a substantial project within the federal IT landscape, likely involving complex integration and deployment requirements across multiple geographic locations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate whether this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. Without this information, it is difficult to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem. Large IT contracts often have subcontracting goals to ensure small businesses participate, but this specific contract's details are not available.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the USCENTAF. The contract's performance would be monitored against established milestones and deliverables. Transparency would depend on GSA's reporting practices and the availability of contract performance data. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems
Cloud Computing Services
IT Modernization Programs
Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Contracts
Command and Control Systems

Risk Flags

Lack of competition data
High contract value requires diligent oversight
Complexity of migration and development tasks
Potential for integration challenges with existing systems

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $32.8 million to INFORELIANCE LLC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES NECESSARY TO: PROVIDE PROJECT MANAGEMENT OF ENTERPRISE STRATEGY CONSULTING AND SOLUTION CONFIGURATION. MANAGE DEPLOYMENT, APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT, MIGRATION AND SUPPORT. CONFIGURE AN ENTERPRISE SHAREPOINT COLLABORATION SOLUTION WHICH SUPPORTS AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR) OPERATIONS. DEPLOY ENTERPRISE SHAREPOINT COLLABORATION SOLUTION TO THE USCENTAF AOR SITES AND CONUS WING LOCATIONS. MIGRATE LEGACY APPLICATIONS TO THE ENTERPRISE SHAREP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INFORELIANCE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-02-01. End: 2010-01-31.

What was the specific justification for the procurement method used for this contract?

The provided data does not specify the procurement method (e.g., full and open competition, sole source, limited competition). To determine the justification, one would need to access the contract's solicitation documents, award justification, or relevant procurement records. Federal procurement regulations require specific justifications for non-competitive awards, such as the existence of a unique capability, urgent need, or a specific statutory authority. Without these details, it's impossible to assess the appropriateness of the procurement method and its potential impact on cost savings for taxpayers.

How does the per-unit cost of the SharePoint configuration and development compare to industry benchmarks?

Benchmarking the per-unit cost for this contract is challenging without specific details on the 'units' of work. If 'units' refer to user licenses, modules configured, or applications developed, we would need granular data on the scope and complexity of each. For instance, the cost per application developed or per module configured would need to be compared against market rates for similar custom development and SharePoint integration services. Given the total value of $32.7 million over two years, the average annual cost is substantial, suggesting a significant scope of work that would require detailed analysis against comparable projects to determine value for money.

What is INFOliance LLC's track record with similar large-scale enterprise IT projects for the Department of Defense or other federal agencies?

Assessing INFOliance LLC's track record requires reviewing their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving large-scale enterprise IT solutions, SharePoint deployments, application development, and migration services. Information on past performance, including client satisfaction, adherence to schedule and budget, and quality of deliverables, is typically available through sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or contractor performance assessment reporting tools. A review of their history would help determine their capability and reliability in executing complex projects like the one awarded by GSA for USCENTAF.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this SharePoint collaboration solution deployment and support?

Key performance indicators for this contract would likely focus on system availability, user adoption rates, performance metrics (e.g., response times for applications), successful migration of legacy data, and the quality of support provided (e.g., ticket resolution times, customer satisfaction). The contract statement of work (SOW) should detail these KPIs. Effective monitoring of these indicators is crucial for ensuring the deployed solution meets USCENTAF's operational needs and that the contractor is delivering value as expected.

How does the total spending on enterprise collaboration solutions like SharePoint compare across different federal agencies over the past five years?

Analyzing historical spending on enterprise collaboration solutions across federal agencies requires aggregating data from sources like FPDS. This would involve identifying contracts categorized under IT services, software development, and collaboration platforms, with a focus on SharePoint implementations. Trends might reveal shifts in technology adoption, agency-specific needs, and the overall market growth for such services. Comparing spending patterns can highlight agencies with significant investments, potential areas for consolidation, or emerging technological requirements.

What is the potential risk associated with migrating legacy applications to the new SharePoint solution, and how is this risk being mitigated?

Migrating legacy applications carries inherent risks, including data loss, compatibility issues, functional gaps, and disruption to ongoing operations. Mitigation strategies typically involve thorough planning, phased migration approaches, comprehensive testing (unit, integration, user acceptance), robust data backup and recovery procedures, and dedicated support during and after the transition. The contract's project management and technical consulting components are critical for identifying and addressing these risks proactively to ensure a smooth and successful migration.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Contractor Details

Address: 9990 LEE HWY STE 450, FAIRFAX, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Subchapter S Corporation

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $32,764,088

Exercised Options: $32,764,088

Current Obligation: $32,764,088

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0273L

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline