GSA's $13.8M IT Products contract with Sprint Communications Co LP awarded in 2006, expiring in 2009

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,822,818 ($13.8M)

Contractor: Sprint Communications CO LP

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2006-03-27

End Date: 2009-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,100 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.6K/day

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: IT PRODUCTS

Place of Performance

Location: FORT KNOX, HARDIN County, KENTUCKY, 40121

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $13.8 million to SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO LP for work described as: IT PRODUCTS Key points: 1. Contract value of $13.8M for IT products suggests a moderate scale of procurement. 2. Awarded by GSA's Federal Acquisition Service, indicating a focus on common-use IT. 3. The contract duration of approximately 3 years (1100 days) is typical for IT product procurements. 4. Award type 'DO' (Defense priority rating) might imply a connection to defense needs, though GSA is civilian. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 443120 points to computer and software retail. 6. The contract was awarded under a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) structure, providing cost certainty.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking this contract's value is challenging without specific IT product details. However, $13.8 million over three years for IT products is a moderate expenditure. The FFP structure implies price was negotiated upfront, but without knowing the specific products and quantities, assessing value-for-money is difficult. Comparing it to similar GSA schedule contracts for IT products would provide better context.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition level for this contract is not explicitly detailed in the provided data. The presence of '4' bidders suggests some level of competition, but the specific solicitation method (e.g., GSA Schedule, open solicitation) is unknown. A higher number of bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower prices for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly impacts taxpayer value. More bidders typically drive down prices, ensuring the government gets the best possible deal for its IT products.

Public Impact

Federal agencies likely benefited from access to IT products through this contract. The contract facilitated the acquisition of computer hardware and software. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, as GSA contracts are typically available for use across the US. Workforce implications are minimal, as this contract is for product acquisition, not services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific product details makes it hard to assess if the best value was obtained.
The 'DO' award type warrants further investigation to understand its relevance to a civilian agency contract.
Limited information on competition makes it difficult to confirm robust price discovery.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Awarded by GSA, suggesting adherence to established procurement procedures.
Multiple bidders (4) indicate some level of market engagement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically the procurement of IT products. The market for IT products is vast and highly competitive, with numerous manufacturers and resellers. GSA plays a crucial role in consolidating government purchasing power for IT, often leveraging GSA Schedules to provide agencies with pre-competed, competitively priced IT solutions. This contract likely represents a portion of the government's overall IT spending, which is a significant category.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting goals. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem. GSA often utilizes its schedules, which may include small business participation, but specific contract-level details are needed.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by GSA's Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the FFP contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified products at the agreed price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS-NG, though detailed performance metrics might not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules
IT Hardware Procurement
IT Software Procurement
Defense Priorities

Risk Flags

Lack of specific product details hinders value assessment.
Ambiguity surrounding the 'DO' award type.
Limited data on competition effectiveness.
No performance data available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $13.8 million to SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO LP. IT PRODUCTS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO LP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-27. End: 2009-03-31.

What specific IT products were procured under this contract, and what was the unit pricing?

The provided data does not specify the exact IT products procured under this contract, nor does it offer unit pricing details. The NAICS code 443120 suggests general categories like computers and software. Without a detailed list of items, quantities, and their associated prices, a granular analysis of value for money or comparison to market rates is not feasible. This information would typically be found in the contract's statement of work or delivery orders.

How did the pricing of IT products under this contract compare to prevailing market rates at the time of award?

Direct comparison of pricing to market rates is not possible with the given data. The contract was awarded under a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) structure, implying prices were negotiated upfront. To assess market competitiveness, one would need to compare the specific product line items and their negotiated prices against contemporaneous commercial price lists or other government contract awards for identical or similar items. The '4' bidders suggest some competition, which should theoretically drive prices towards market levels, but without specific product data, this remains an assumption.

What was the rationale for the 'DO' award type, given the contract was awarded by GSA?

The 'DO' award type typically signifies a Defense priority rating, used to ensure timely delivery of materials or services critical to national defense. While GSA is a civilian agency, it can procure items for defense agencies or support defense-related missions. The 'DO' rating on this IT products contract might indicate that the procured items were intended for use by a defense entity or were deemed critical for national security purposes, necessitating priority allocation of resources by the contractor.

What was the performance history of Sprint Communications Co LP on this contract?

The provided data does not include performance metrics or history for Sprint Communications Co LP on this specific contract. Performance evaluation typically involves assessing factors like on-time delivery, product quality, and responsiveness to issues. Such information is usually documented in contract performance reports, past performance questionnaires, or agency inspection records. Without access to these records, it's impossible to evaluate the contractor's performance.

How does this $13.8M IT products contract fit into GSA's overall IT spending patterns during the 2006-2009 period?

This $13.8 million contract represents a moderate portion of GSA's IT spending during the 2006-2009 period. GSA manages vast IT procurement vehicles, including its IT Schedule 70 (now IT Category), which facilitates billions of dollars in IT product and service sales annually. While $13.8M is significant for a single contract, it is likely a small fraction of GSA's total IT procurement portfolio. Understanding its context requires comparing it against total agency IT budgets and other major IT contracts awarded during that timeframe.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Retail Trade › Electronics and Appliance Stores › Computer and Software Stores

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Sprint Communications, Inc. (UEI: 006942395)

Address: 12524 SUNRISE VALLEY DR FL 2, RESTON, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,822,818

Exercised Options: $13,822,818

Current Obligation: $13,822,818

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0329L

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline