Deloitte Consulting LLP awarded $12.9M contract for strategic business initiative consulting by GSA
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,909,384 ($12.9M)
Contractor: Deloitte Consulting LLP
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2005-10-27
End Date: 2009-02-10
Contract Duration: 1,202 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.7K/day
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS TASK IS TO INCORPORATE A CONSULTATIVE APPROACH IN DEVELOPING AND DEFINING THE STRATEGIC BUSINESS INITIATIVES OF THE NCPHI PMO. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESEARCH AND ANALYZE MANAGEMENT PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES, INTERPRET RESULTS, IDENTIFY NEEDS AND PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO CLIENT IN FORMULATING A UNIFIED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EXPERTISE TO REENGINEER ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS IN SUPPORT OF TACTICAL MEASURES EMPLOYED TO REACH STRATEGIC GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE INSTRUMENTAL IN DRAFTING, ADVISING AND PREPARING THE NCPHI BUSINESS PLAN.
Place of Performance
Location: ATLANTA, DEKALB County, GEORGIA, 30329
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $12.9 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP for work described as: THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS TASK IS TO INCORPORATE A CONSULTATIVE APPROACH IN DEVELOPING AND DEFINING THE STRATEGIC BUSINESS INITIATIVES OF THE NCPHI PMO. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESEARCH AND ANALYZE MANAGEMENT PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES, INTERPRET RESULTS, IDENTIFY NEEDS AND PROVIDE ASSISTANCE… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on strategic business initiative development and implementation planning. 2. Services include research, analysis, and recommendations for organizational performance. 3. The contract aims to support tactical measures for achieving strategic goals. 4. Deloitte Consulting LLP is a major player in the management consulting sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $12.9M over approximately 3.3 years suggests a significant investment in consulting services. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. The pricing appears to be on the higher end for management consulting, but may be justified by the scope.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
The contract type is Time and Materials, which can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. The method of competition is not specified, but for consulting services of this nature, it could range from full and open to limited competition. The lack of transparency on competition makes price discovery assessment challenging.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for strategic planning and organizational improvement, which can yield long-term benefits if successful. However, the effectiveness and efficiency of the spending are key to determining the ultimate taxpayer impact.
Public Impact
Improved government efficiency through strategic business initiative development. Potential for better alignment of tactical actions with overarching agency goals. Enhanced organizational performance and service delivery through expert consulting. Investment in strategic planning could lead to more effective use of future resources. Public trust may be bolstered by demonstrated efforts towards operational excellence.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of defined performance metrics.
- Potential for cost overruns with Time and Materials contract.
- Unclear competition method impacting price reasonableness.
Positive Signals
- Focus on strategic business initiatives.
- Involvement of a reputable consulting firm.
- Potential for significant organizational improvement.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611). Spending in this sector is common for government agencies seeking to improve operations and strategic planning. Benchmarks for similar contracts vary widely based on scope and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this contract. Large consulting firms like Deloitte are typically awarded these types of broad strategic initiatives.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would be crucial to ensure the contractor is meeting objectives and managing costs effectively, especially given the Time and Materials contract type. The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for awarding and overseeing this contract.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- General Services Administration Contracting
- Federal Acquisition Service Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is substantial (1202 days).
- Time and Materials contract type carries inherent cost risk.
- Scope is broad, focusing on strategic initiatives and organizational reengineering.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
- Competition method is not detailed, impacting price reasonableness assessment.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, general-services-administration, ga, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $12.9 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP. THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS TASK IS TO INCORPORATE A CONSULTATIVE APPROACH IN DEVELOPING AND DEFINING THE STRATEGIC BUSINESS INITIATIVES OF THE NCPHI PMO. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESEARCH AND ANALYZE MANAGEMENT PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES, INTERPRET RESULTS, IDENTIFY NEEDS AND PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO CLIENT IN FORMULATING A UNIFIED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EXPERTISE TO REENGINEER ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS IN SUPPORT OF TACTICAL MEASURES EMPLOYED TO REACH STRATEGIC G
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-10-27. End: 2009-02-10.
What specific, measurable outcomes are expected from this $12.9M consulting engagement to justify the investment?
The contract aims to develop and define strategic business initiatives, reengineer organizational performance, and draft recommendations for tactical measures. Expected outcomes should include a unified implementation plan, a comprehensive business plan for NCPHI, and clearly defined metrics for improved organizational performance and goal achievement. Without these specifics, assessing the return on investment is challenging.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks include potential cost overruns due to the Time and Materials contract type, scope creep, and the possibility that the contractor's recommendations may not be effectively implemented or aligned with agency needs. Mitigation strategies should involve robust project management, clear deliverable definitions, regular performance reviews, and strong government oversight to ensure adherence to scope and budget.
How will the effectiveness of the consulting services be measured to ensure taxpayer value?
Effectiveness should be measured against the successful development and adoption of the strategic business initiatives and implementation plan. Key performance indicators (KPIs) related to improved efficiency, cost savings, enhanced service delivery, and achievement of strategic goals should be established and tracked post-engagement. Regular progress reports and post-implementation reviews are essential for evaluating the long-term impact.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Deloitte LLP (UEI: 014127109)
Address: 4301 N FAIRFAX DR STE 210, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $12,940,211
Exercised Options: $12,913,039
Current Obligation: $12,909,384
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F9796H
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-10-27
Current End Date: 2009-02-10
Potential End Date: 2009-02-10 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-03-13
More Contracts from Deloitte Consulting LLP
- R12 Upgrade - System Integration and Hosting Support — $465.6M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Award and IF — $448.6M (General Services Administration)
- Cade 2 Ltis3 Covid-19 — $383.8M (Department of the Treasury)
- This Requirement Shall Provide Support Which Shall Include: Capability Delivery Lifecycle Management, Enhancement/Development Delivery, Configuration, Additional Enhancement/Development Delivery, Ptems Enhancements and Development — $336.1M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Award of Information Technology Global Enterprise Management Services IT Gems Requirement — $332.8M (General Services Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)