Leidos, Inc. awarded $17.9M for engineering services, with a 5-year duration
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,909,054 ($17.9M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2005-02-01
End Date: 2010-02-28
Contract Duration: 1,853 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.7K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: SHALL PROVIDE LIFE CYCLE TECHNICAL AND PROGRAMMATIC ANALYSES SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35898
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $17.9 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: SHALL PROVIDE LIFE CYCLE TECHNICAL AND PROGRAMMATIC ANALYSES SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a competitive basis, suggesting potential for price discovery. 2. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks if not managed closely. 3. Performance period spans over 5 years, indicating a long-term need for these services. 4. The award was made by the General Services Administration, a common contracting vehicle. 5. Engineering services are critical for various government functions, implying broad applicability. 6. The contract was not set aside for small businesses, suggesting larger prime contractors were involved.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total value of $17.9 million over five years averages to approximately $3.58 million per year. Without specific benchmarks for similar life cycle technical and programmatic analysis support, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. The Time and Materials (T&M) contract type, while flexible, carries inherent risks of cost overruns if not meticulously managed and monitored for efficiency. Benchmarking against other T&M contracts for similar engineering services would be necessary for a more robust assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely had the opportunity to bid. The presence of competition is generally positive for price discovery and ensuring the government receives a fair market price. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full-and-open' designation implies a robust competitive process.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a marketplace where contractors vie for the best price and performance.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are government agencies requiring technical and programmatic analysis support. Services delivered likely include strategic planning, technical assessments, and program management assistance. The geographic impact is not specified but likely supports federal operations nationwide. Workforce implications may involve engineers, analysts, and program managers employed by the contractor.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to uncontrolled cost growth if not closely monitored.
- Lack of specific performance metrics or KPIs makes it difficult to assess contractor efficiency.
- The long duration of the contract (5 years) increases the risk of scope creep or evolving requirements not being adequately addressed.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting a degree of market validation.
- The General Services Administration (GSA) is a reputable agency for managing federal contracts.
- The contract addresses critical technical and programmatic analysis needs, indicating essential service delivery.
Sector Analysis
Engineering services represent a significant segment of the federal contracting market, encompassing a wide range of specialized expertise. This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar technical and programmatic support contracts can vary widely based on scope, duration, and agency. The federal government consistently spends billions annually on engineering and related professional services to support its diverse missions.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, Leidos, Inc. While there is no direct information on subcontracting plans, large prime contractors are often encouraged or required to subcontract a portion of the work to small businesses. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for direct prime contracting were likely limited for smaller firms in this specific award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the agency that awarded the contract (General Services Administration). Performance monitoring, invoice review, and compliance checks are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which provide award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Technical Support Services
- Program Management Support
- Engineering Consulting
- Federal IT Services
- Professional Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to T&M contract type.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data.
- Long contract duration increases risk of scope creep.
- Limited insight into number of bidders in competitive process.
Tags
engineering-services, general-services-administration, leidos-inc, time-and-materials, competitive-delivery-order, professional-services, technical-support, programmatic-analysis, long-term-contract, federal-acquisition-service, alabama, >$10m
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $17.9 million to LEIDOS, INC.. SHALL PROVIDE LIFE CYCLE TECHNICAL AND PROGRAMMATIC ANALYSES SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-02-01. End: 2010-02-28.
What is the historical spending pattern for this specific contract vehicle or for Leidos, Inc. with the GSA for similar services?
Analyzing historical spending for this contract vehicle (if it's a recurring ID) or Leidos's broader contract portfolio with GSA for engineering and technical support would provide context. For instance, if Leidos has consistently performed well on similar T&M contracts with GSA, it might indicate a reliable track record. Conversely, a history of cost overruns or performance issues on comparable contracts could raise concerns. Without access to specific historical data for this award ID or detailed performance reviews, it's challenging to establish a definitive pattern. However, the 5-year duration and $17.9M value suggest a significant, ongoing relationship that likely has some established performance history within GSA's systems.
How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated value or budget for this type of engineering support?
The awarded amount of $17.9 million over five years, averaging approximately $3.58 million annually, needs to be benchmarked against the government's estimated budget or the typical cost for similar life cycle technical and programmatic analysis support. Without knowing the government's initial estimate or data from comparable contracts, it's difficult to ascertain if this award represents a good or fair price. The Time and Materials (T&M) nature of the contract means the final cost is dependent on actual hours worked and material used, making a direct comparison to a fixed-price contract challenging. A thorough analysis would require access to the government's cost estimates and data on similar T&M awards.
What are the specific performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) associated with this contract?
The provided data does not specify the performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. For a Time and Materials contract, effective oversight often relies on tracking labor hours, material costs, and ensuring deliverables meet defined quality standards and timelines. The absence of explicit KPIs in the summary data makes it difficult to assess how contractor performance is measured and managed. Robust contracts typically include clauses that allow for remedies or adjustments if performance falls short. Understanding these metrics is crucial for evaluating the contractor's value and the overall success of the engagement.
What is the potential risk associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type for this specific service?
The Time and Materials (T&M) contract type carries inherent risks, primarily related to cost control. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M agreements reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified hourly rates and for the actual cost of materials. This structure can lead to cost overruns if the effort required is greater than anticipated or if labor hours are not efficiently utilized. For engineering services involving complex technical and programmatic analysis, predicting the exact effort can be challenging. Effective risk mitigation requires stringent oversight, detailed tracking of hours and materials, and clear definitions of what constitutes 'materials'. Without robust monitoring, the $17.9 million ceiling could be exceeded.
What is the track record of Leidos, Inc. in delivering similar engineering and programmatic analysis support to the federal government?
Leidos, Inc. is a major government contractor with a substantial track record across various federal agencies and service areas, including engineering and technical support. While specific performance details for this particular $17.9 million GSA contract are not detailed here, Leidos generally has extensive experience in complex program management and technical analysis. Their past performance on similar contracts would be a key factor in the GSA's decision-making process. A comprehensive assessment would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any contract disputes, and their overall success rate in delivering comparable services to government clients.
How does the duration of this contract (5 years) impact the overall risk and value proposition?
A five-year duration for a $17.9 million contract indicates a long-term need for the engineering and programmatic analysis support being provided. This extended period offers potential benefits, such as fostering a deeper understanding of agency needs and allowing for the development of more integrated solutions. However, it also increases risks. The longer timeframe heightens the possibility of scope creep, evolving technological requirements, or changes in agency priorities that may not align with the original contract scope. Furthermore, the T&M nature of the contract means that costs can accumulate over a longer period, necessitating sustained and rigorous oversight to ensure value for money throughout the contract's life.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 4TWP21057902
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 1710 SAIC DRIVE, ROOM #8033, MCLEAN, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $31,386,480
Exercised Options: $17,974,795
Current Obligation: $17,909,054
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F0107J
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-02-01
Current End Date: 2010-02-28
Potential End Date: 2010-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-09-04
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)