CACI NSS awarded $24.5M for installation geobase support to enhance warfighter safety and effectiveness

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,536,705 ($24.5M)

Contractor: CACI NSS, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2011-07-01

End Date: 2016-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,857 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION GEOBASE SUPPORT TO CONTINUE TO IMPROVE THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE WARFIGHTER BY EVOLVING THE GEOBASE GARRISON, GEOREACH AND EXPEDITIONARY GEOBASE ENVIRONMENTS AT PACIFIC AIR FORCES (PACAF) AND BY -STANDING UP AND SUSTAINING THE GARRISON GEOBASE CAPABILITY AT AIR FORCE GLOBAL STRIKE COMMAND (AFGSC)

Place of Performance

Location: HANOVER, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21076

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $24.5 million to CACI NSS, LLC for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION GEOBASE SUPPORT TO CONTINUE TO IMPROVE THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE WARFIGHTER BY EVOLVING THE GEOBASE GARRISON, GEOREACH AND EXPEDITIONARY GEOBASE ENVIRONMENTS AT PACIFIC AIR FORCES (PACAF) AND BY -STANDING UP AND SUST… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on evolving geobase environments for Pacific Air Forces and Air Force Global Strike Command. 2. The award represents a significant investment in geospatial intelligence capabilities for critical Air Force commands. 3. Performance period spans over five years, indicating a long-term need for these services. 4. The contract type, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, suggests potential for cost overruns if not managed carefully. 5. This award falls under computer systems design services, a key area for defense modernization. 6. The geographic focus on PACAF implies support for operations in the Indo-Pacific region.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific delivery order is challenging without comparable contract data for similar geobase support services. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can sometimes lead to higher costs than fixed-price contracts if the contractor's costs exceed initial estimates. However, CPFF is often used when the scope of work is not fully defined, allowing for flexibility in evolving requirements. The total value of $24.5 million over approximately five years suggests a moderate annual spend for specialized IT support.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of 5 bidders suggests a competitive landscape for these specialized geospatial support services. Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best value for the government's investment in critical warfighter support systems.

Public Impact

Warfighters will benefit from improved safety and effectiveness through enhanced geospatial intelligence capabilities. Services delivered include the evolution and sustainment of geobase environments at PACAF and AFGSC. Geographic impact is concentrated at Pacific Air Forces (PACAF) installations and Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) locations. Workforce implications include the need for skilled personnel in geospatial analysis, IT support, and system sustainment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type may lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
The duration of the contract (over 5 years) requires sustained oversight to ensure continued value.
Evolving geobase environments suggest potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
Focus on enhancing warfighter safety and effectiveness aligns with core defense objectives.
Support for critical commands like PACAF and AFGSC highlights the strategic importance of the services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector, a critical component of the IT services market supporting defense operations. The market for defense IT modernization and geospatial intelligence is substantial, driven by the need for advanced situational awareness and operational planning. This contract represents a specific application of IT services to enhance military readiness and effectiveness, fitting within the broader trend of technology adoption in the defense sector. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other contracts for IT system design, development, and sustainment for military branches.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a result, small businesses are unlikely to be direct prime contractors on this award. However, there may be subcontracting opportunities for small businesses with CACI NSS, LLC, depending on the specific technical requirements and the company's subcontracting plan. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem would be minimal unless significant subcontracting occurs.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA) and the relevant Air Force commands (PACAF and AFGSC). The contract type (CPFF) necessitates close financial oversight to manage costs and ensure the fixed fee remains appropriate. Accountability measures would be tied to performance metrics and delivery schedules outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific operational details may be sensitive.

Related Government Programs

Geospatial Intelligence Support
Air Force IT Modernization
Defense Command and Control Systems
Warfighter Support Systems
Pacific Air Forces Operations Support
Air Force Global Strike Command IT Services

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires diligent cost monitoring.
Long contract duration necessitates ongoing performance evaluation.
Evolving requirements may pose scope management challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $24.5 million to CACI NSS, LLC. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION GEOBASE SUPPORT TO CONTINUE TO IMPROVE THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE WARFIGHTER BY EVOLVING THE GEOBASE GARRISON, GEOREACH AND EXPEDITIONARY GEOBASE ENVIRONMENTS AT PACIFIC AIR FORCES (PACAF) AND BY -STANDING UP AND SUSTAINING THE GARRISON GEOBASE CAPABILITY AT AIR FORCE GLOBAL STRIKE COMMAND (AFGSC)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI NSS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-07-01. End: 2016-07-31.

What is the track record of CACI NSS, LLC in providing similar geobase support services to the Department of Defense?

CACI NSS, LLC, as a subsidiary or part of a larger CACI entity, has a significant history of providing IT and support services to the Department of Defense. While specific details on 'geobase support' for CACI NSS, LLC alone require deeper investigation into their contract portfolio, CACI International Inc. (the parent company) has extensive experience in areas like intelligence analysis, command and control systems, IT infrastructure, and geospatial services. They have supported various branches of the military, including the Air Force, on numerous large-scale programs. Their track record generally indicates a capacity to handle complex IT requirements for defense clients, often involving sensitive data and critical operational support. Performance on past contracts, including any past performance evaluations or awards, would provide further insight into their capabilities and reliability in delivering similar services.

How does the $24.5 million value compare to other contracts for similar installation geobase support?

The $24.5 million value for this five-year delivery order for installation geobase support is a moderate figure within the broader landscape of defense IT contracts. Without access to a comprehensive database of all similar 'geobase support' contracts across the DoD, a precise comparison is difficult. However, contracts for enterprise IT services, system design, and sustainment for major commands can range from tens of millions to billions of dollars. This specific award suggests a focused scope, likely supporting specific environments or capabilities within PACAF and AFGSC, rather than a full enterprise-wide IT overhaul. It is comparable to other specialized IT support contracts awarded to mid-to-large sized federal contractors for specific mission-critical functions.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for IT services?

The primary risk associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for IT services is the potential for cost overruns. In a CPFF structure, the government pays the contractor's allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. If the contractor's actual costs exceed initial estimates, the government bears the burden of these increased costs, while the contractor's fee remains unchanged. This can lead to the project costing more than initially budgeted. For IT services, risks include unforeseen technical challenges, scope creep if requirements are not tightly managed, and difficulties in accurately estimating labor hours and material costs for complex systems. Effective oversight, robust cost tracking, and clear definition of work are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effective are geobase environments in improving warfighter safety and effectiveness?

Geobase environments are crucial for improving warfighter safety and effectiveness by providing accurate, up-to-date, and accessible geospatial information. This includes detailed mapping, terrain analysis, facility information, and operational boundaries. For warfighters, this translates to better situational awareness, improved mission planning, enhanced navigation, and more precise targeting. Safety is enhanced through better understanding of the operational environment, identification of potential hazards, and improved coordination. Effectiveness is boosted by enabling faster decision-making, optimizing resource deployment, and ensuring that forces operate with the most current intelligence. The evolution of these environments, as specified in the contract, aims to keep pace with technological advancements and evolving operational needs.

What is the historical spending trend for computer systems design services within the Air Force?

Historical spending trends for computer systems design services within the Air Force have generally shown a consistent and significant investment, reflecting the increasing reliance on technology for all aspects of military operations. Over the past decade, the Air Force has continuously sought to modernize its IT infrastructure, develop advanced command and control systems, and enhance its intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities. Spending in this category often fluctuates based on major modernization programs, cybersecurity initiatives, and the adoption of new technologies like cloud computing and artificial intelligence. While specific figures vary annually, the overall trend indicates a sustained demand for these services to maintain technological superiority and operational readiness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc

Address: 11955 FREEDOM DR STE 12000, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $50,332,090

Exercised Options: $50,332,090

Current Obligation: $24,536,705

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 12

Total Subaward Amount: $1,161,146

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q09BGD0037

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline