USDA RMA Awards $154M IT Services Contract to SAIC via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $154,316,065 ($154.3M)

Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2011-01-27

End Date: 2016-01-30

Contract Duration: 1,829 days

Daily Burn Rate: $84.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACQUISITION IS TO PROCURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE MISSION OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY (RMA), AN AGENCY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA). RMA REQUIRES THE FULL RANGE OF IT SERVICES IN ORDER TO DEVELOP AND DELIVER NEW CROP INSURANCE PRODUCTS, SUPPORT HIGH EMPLOYEE PRODUCTIVITY, DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN NEW IT SYSTEMS, AND DESIGN, DEPLOY, AND MAINTAIN THE UNDERLYING INFRASTRUCTURE FOR AFOREMENTIONED ACTIVITIES.

Place of Performance

Location: KANSAS CITY, JACKSON County, MISSOURI, 64141

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $154.3 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACQUISITION IS TO PROCURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE MISSION OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY (RMA), AN AGENCY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA). RMA REQUIRES THE FULL RANGE OF IT SERVICES IN ORDER TO DEVELOP AND DELI… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for IT services supporting the Risk Management Agency (RMA). 2. The acquisition aims to support the development of new crop insurance products and maintain IT infrastructure. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), which can incentivize performance but requires careful oversight.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $154.3 million over 5 years for comprehensive IT services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT support contracts for federal agencies would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is expected to yield a fair price for taxpayers, though the CPAF structure necessitates monitoring to ensure cost efficiency.

Public Impact

Farmers and agricultural businesses will benefit from improved crop insurance products and services. USDA employees will have access to enhanced IT systems and infrastructure, boosting productivity. The contract supports critical functions of the RMA, contributing to the stability of the agricultural sector. SAIC's role in providing these services ensures continuity and development of essential IT capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 75 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. Spending in this area for federal agencies is substantial, supporting a wide range of digital infrastructure and software development needs.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. While awarded to a large prime contractor (SAIC), opportunities for small business subcontracting may exist but are not explicitly detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure requires robust oversight from the General Services Administration (GSA) to ensure performance targets are met and costs are controlled. Regular performance reviews and audits are crucial.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, general-services-administration, mo, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $154.3 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACQUISITION IS TO PROCURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE MISSION OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY (RMA), AN AGENCY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA). RMA REQUIRES THE FULL RANGE OF IT SERVICES IN ORDER TO DEVELOP AND DELIVER NEW CROP INSURANCE PRODUCTS, SUPPORT HIGH EMPLOYEE PRODUCTIVITY, DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN NEW IT SYSTEMS, AND DESIGN, DEPLOY, AND MAINTAIN THE UNDERLYING INFRASTRUCTURE FOR AFOREMENTIONED ACTIVITIES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $154.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-01-27. End: 2016-01-30.

How effectively will the CPAF structure incentivize SAIC to deliver high-quality IT services within budget constraints for the RMA?

The effectiveness of the CPAF structure hinges on clearly defined performance metrics and achievable award fee criteria. If well-structured, it can motivate SAIC to exceed expectations in service delivery and cost management. However, poorly defined criteria or excessive fees could inflate costs without a proportional increase in value, necessitating diligent oversight by GSA to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently and effectively.

What are the potential risks associated with a 5-year IT services contract, and how are they mitigated?

Potential risks include technological obsolescence, vendor lock-in, and performance degradation over time. Mitigation strategies likely involve contract clauses for regular performance reviews, technology refresh requirements, and clear exit strategies. The full and open competition at the outset helps mitigate initial pricing risks, but ongoing vendor management is key to addressing long-term challenges and ensuring continued value.

Does the $154 million contract value represent a fair market price for the IT services procured by the RMA?

The contract value appears within a reasonable range for a 5-year, comprehensive IT services contract for a federal agency of the RMA's size and scope. The use of full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment. However, a definitive assessment of fair market price would require detailed analysis of the specific services, labor categories, and comparison with industry benchmarks for similar government contracts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12010 SUNSET HILLS RD, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $208,029,306

Exercised Options: $208,029,306

Current Obligation: $154,316,065

Actual Outlays: $-148,150

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 252

Total Subaward Amount: $220,716,331

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q09BGD0048

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-01-27

Current End Date: 2016-01-30

Potential End Date: 2016-01-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-12-04

More Contracts from Science Applications International Corporation

View all Science Applications International Corporation federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending