GSA awards $30.5M contract for administrative management consulting services to HII Mission Technologies Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,481,896 ($30.5M)

Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2016-09-29

End Date: 2020-09-28

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $20.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF 711TH SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $30.5 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF 711TH SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1460 days (4 years) indicates a significant, long-term need for these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to a focus on management consulting. 5. The award was a Delivery Order, implying it was part of a larger Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. 6. The contract was awarded to a single entity, HII Mission Technologies Corp.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $30.5 million contract is challenging without specific performance metrics or comparable contract data. The firm fixed-price structure provides some cost predictability. However, the absence of detailed performance data or comparisons to similar contracts makes a definitive value assessment difficult. Further analysis would require understanding the specific services rendered and their impact on agency operations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific award. While competition is present, the exact number of bidders and the nature of the bidding process would provide a clearer picture of its intensity and impact on pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging lower prices and better service offerings from contractors.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely federal agencies requiring administrative management and general management consulting services. The services delivered are expected to improve operational efficiency and management practices within the contracting agency. The contract's geographic impact is noted as 'OHIO' (ST='OH', SN='OHIO'), suggesting a focus on operations or personnel within that state. Workforce implications could include the engagement of specialized consultants and potential impacts on internal agency staffing models.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true value for money.
The specific nature of 'administrative management and general management consulting' can be broad, potentially leading to scope creep if not well-defined.
Reliance on external consultants may impact the development of internal agency expertise over the long term.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a fair and accessible process.
Firm fixed-price contract type offers budget certainty for the government.
The contract duration suggests a sustained need and potential for stable service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide range of government functions. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other contracts for similar management consulting services across various federal agencies, considering factors like contract size, duration, and specific service areas.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (SB=false) was not a specific set-aside for this contract. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular award appears limited, unless HII Mission Technologies Corp. voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service which awarded it. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Management and Consulting Services
Professional Services Contracts
Federal Acquisition Service Contracts
General Services Administration Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.
Risk of contractor underperformance if profit margins are too thin.
Limited transparency into specific service delivery metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $30.5 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. IGF::CL::IGF 711TH SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-09-29. End: 2020-09-28.

What specific types of administrative management and general management consulting services were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 541611, which covers Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. This broad category can encompass a wide range of activities, including organizational structure consulting, process improvement, strategic planning, human capital management, and operational efficiency analysis. Without access to the detailed statement of work (SOW) or task orders issued under this contract, the precise nature of the services rendered remains unspecified. However, it is reasonable to infer that HII Mission Technologies Corp. provided expertise to help the contracting agency improve its management practices, streamline operations, and achieve its strategic objectives.

How does the awarded amount of $30.5 million compare to typical spending for similar management consulting contracts?

Comparing the $30.5 million award to typical spending for similar contracts requires access to a broader dataset of federal procurement information, specifically for NAICS 541611. However, as a four-year contract (1460 days), the average annual value is approximately $7.6 million. This figure is substantial and suggests a significant scope of work or a high level of expertise required. Larger federal agencies often award multi-million dollar contracts for management consulting to address complex organizational challenges. Without specific benchmarks for contracts of similar duration and scope within GSA or other agencies, it's difficult to definitively label this as high or low, but it represents a considerable investment in consulting services.

What is the track record of HII Mission Technologies Corp. in delivering federal consulting services?

HII Mission Technologies Corp. is a subsidiary of Huntington Ingalls Industries, a major defense contractor. While the provided data focuses solely on this specific contract, HII Mission Technologies has a broad portfolio of services including C5ISR, cyber, electronic warfare, and mission engineering. Their involvement in federal contracts, particularly within the defense and intelligence sectors, suggests a significant track record. However, a comprehensive assessment of their performance on this specific GSA contract would require reviewing past performance evaluations, any contract disputes, and client feedback, which are not detailed in the provided summary data.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract of this duration?

Firm fixed-price (FFP) contracts aim to provide cost certainty for the government. However, risks can arise, particularly with longer durations like this four-year contract. If the scope of work is not precisely defined or if unforeseen circumstances arise, the contractor may face challenges in meeting the fixed price, potentially leading to reduced quality or contractor financial distress. Conversely, if the contractor significantly overestimates costs or if efficiencies are found, the government might be paying a premium. For the government, the primary risk is ensuring the contractor remains motivated to perform efficiently and effectively throughout the contract's life without the flexibility to easily adjust pricing for changing conditions.

How does the 'full and open competition' award mechanism impact the government's ability to secure competitive pricing?

The 'full and open competition' award mechanism is designed to maximize competition by allowing all responsible sources to submit offers. This process is generally considered the most effective way for the government to achieve competitive pricing, as it encourages multiple bidders to vie for the contract, driving down costs and improving the quality of proposals. In this case, with two bids received, the competition was present, but the level of competition (i.e., the number of bidders) can influence the degree to which prices are driven down. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more aggressive pricing strategies.

What is the historical spending trend for administrative management and general management consulting services by the General Services Administration?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for administrative management and general management consulting services by the GSA requires access to historical procurement data beyond this single contract award. GSA, as a major procurement agency, likely awards numerous contracts in this category to support its own operations and those of other federal agencies. Trends could be influenced by overall federal budget allocations, shifts in government priorities, and the increasing reliance on external expertise for specialized functions. Without specific historical data, it's impossible to determine if this $30.5 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending for GSA in this service area.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID05160028

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc

Address: 8350 BROAD ST STE 1400, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,481,896

Exercised Options: $30,481,896

Current Obligation: $30,481,896

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F064CA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline