HII Mission Technologies Corp. contract for engineering services valued at $21.3M by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,346,342 ($21.3M)

Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2015-07-01

End Date: 2018-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: JPM GUARDIAN R2TD HI SUSTAINMENT

Place of Performance

Location: GUNPOWDER, HARFORD County, MARYLAND, 21010

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $21.3 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: JPM GUARDIAN R2TD HI SUSTAINMENT Key points: 1. Contract awarded for engineering services, indicating a need for specialized technical expertise. 2. The contract duration of 1095 days suggests a medium-term engagement for sustained support. 3. Awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), a common agency for procurement. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests cost certainty for the government. 5. No small business set-aside was utilized, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller firms. 6. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, implying a broad search for qualified vendors.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $21.3 million over three years for engineering services appears within a reasonable range for complex technical support. Benchmarking against similar GSA contracts for engineering services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the specific deliverables and their market value are key to a definitive assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of only one bid (no: 1) is unusual for full and open competition and raises questions about the effectiveness of the solicitation process or the availability of qualified contractors. This limited number of bids could potentially impact price discovery and may indicate a lack of robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: While full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers, the low number of bids suggests that taxpayers may not have received the full benefit of competitive pricing. Further investigation into the solicitation process is warranted to ensure maximum value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely government agencies requiring specialized engineering expertise for projects managed by GSA. Services delivered include engineering support, crucial for the design, development, or maintenance of government systems or infrastructure. The geographic impact is primarily within Maryland (MD), where the contract is noted to be performed. Workforce implications include the creation or sustainment of jobs for engineers and technical specialists within HII Mission Technologies Corp. and potentially its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330). This sector is characterized by firms providing specialized engineering expertise across various domains, including defense, infrastructure, and technology. The market size for federal engineering services is substantial, with agencies like GSA frequently procuring these services to support a wide range of government programs. This contract represents a portion of that broader spending, focused on sustainment and technical support.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract were likely limited. The absence of small business involvement could impact the broader small business ecosystem by reducing their access to federal prime contracts in this category.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and financial accountability. As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, oversight would likely be managed by the contracting officers within GSA's Federal Acquisition Service. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, though specific performance metrics and IG involvement would depend on the nature of the engineering services and any identified issues.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, general-services-administration, gsa, hii-mission-technologies-corp, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, maryland, sustainment, federal-acquisition-service

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $21.3 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. JPM GUARDIAN R2TD HI SUSTAINMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-07-01. End: 2018-06-30.

What is the track record of HII Mission Technologies Corp. in delivering similar engineering services to the federal government?

HII Mission Technologies Corp. has a significant presence in the federal contracting space, particularly in defense and aerospace sectors. They often provide a range of services including engineering, mission support, and technical solutions. Their track record typically involves large-scale, complex projects. For this specific contract, assessing past performance reviews, any contract modifications, and on-time delivery rates for similar engineering sustainment projects would be crucial. A review of their contract history with GSA and other agencies would reveal their experience in managing firm-fixed-price contracts and meeting client requirements within budget and schedule. Any past performance issues or successes would provide valuable context for evaluating their capability to execute the JPM GUARDIAN R2TD HI SUSTAINMENT contract effectively.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar engineering services contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies?

The contract value of approximately $21.3 million over three years for engineering services (JPM GUARDIAN R2TD HI SUSTAINMENT) needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts. GSA awards numerous engineering service contracts, and the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) can provide data on similar awards by agency, service type, and value. Factors such as the specific type of engineering (e.g., systems, mechanical, electrical), the level of sustainment required, and the duration of the contract are critical for a fair comparison. If this contract's per-year cost or total value is significantly higher or lower than similar contracts with comparable scopes and durations, it could indicate either exceptional value or potential overpricing/underbidding. Without specific comparable contract data, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the $7.1M annual value suggests a substantial, ongoing requirement.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being managed?

Key risks for this contract include potential scope creep, cost overruns (despite the fixed-price nature, changes can occur), contractor performance issues, and reliance on a single bidder under full and open competition. The 'HI SUSTAINMENT' aspect implies a critical need for continuous support, meaning any disruption could have significant operational impacts. Risk management would typically involve detailed performance work statements, regular progress reviews, clear communication channels between GSA and HII Mission Technologies Corp., and contingency planning for potential service interruptions. The government's ability to manage these risks is enhanced by the firm-fixed-price structure, which shifts some cost risk to the contractor, but performance risk remains a significant concern.

What is the expected effectiveness of the services provided under this contract in achieving the government's objectives?

The effectiveness of the engineering services under the JPM GUARDIAN R2TD HI SUSTAINMENT contract hinges on the clarity of the performance work statement and the contractor's ability to meet defined metrics. The objective is likely to ensure the continued operational readiness and performance of a specific government system or asset ('JPM GUARDIAN R2TD'). Effectiveness will be measured by factors such as system uptime, reliability, response times to issues, and successful implementation of sustainment activities. GSA's oversight and performance monitoring are crucial here. If the services successfully maintain or improve the targeted system's performance and availability, the contract will be deemed effective. Conversely, recurring issues or degradation would indicate ineffectiveness.

How has federal spending on engineering services, particularly by GSA, evolved over the past five years?

Federal spending on engineering services has generally seen a steady increase over the past five years, driven by modernization efforts, infrastructure projects, and ongoing defense requirements. GSA, as a primary procurement agency, plays a significant role in this spending, facilitating contracts for various government entities. Data from FPDS indicates a consistent demand for engineering expertise across sectors like IT, defense, and transportation. While specific figures for GSA's engineering services spending fluctuate annually based on agency needs and budget allocations, the overall trend points towards sustained or growing investment in these critical support functions. This contract, awarded in 2015, reflects a portion of that historical spending pattern.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID01150008

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc

Address: 670 DISCOVERY DR, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,346,342

Exercised Options: $21,346,342

Current Obligation: $21,346,342

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $180,376

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADU310

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2015-07-01

Current End Date: 2018-06-30

Potential End Date: 2018-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-03-21

More Contracts from HII Mission Technologies Corp

View all HII Mission Technologies Corp federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending