GSA's $57.7M CDM Dashboard Award to Metrica Team Venture Raises Questions on Value and Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $57,683,119 ($57.7M)

Contractor: Metrica Team Venture

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2014-03-03

End Date: 2019-09-02

Contract Duration: 2,009 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF CDM DASHBOARD AWARD

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22209

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $57.7 million to METRICA TEAM VENTURE for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF CDM DASHBOARD AWARD Key points: 1. The $57.7 million award for computer systems design services highlights a significant investment in federal data management. 2. Competition was limited, raising concerns about potential price discovery and overall value for taxpayer dollars. 3. The contract's duration and cost-plus award fee structure warrant scrutiny for potential cost overruns. 4. The sector is IT, specifically computer systems design, a critical area for federal modernization efforts.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure, while allowing flexibility, can lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT system design contracts is difficult without more granular cost data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating a limited competition. This method may restrict the pool of potential offerors, potentially impacting price competitiveness and the government's ability to secure the best possible pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition can result in higher prices than a fully open process, meaning taxpayers may be paying more than necessary for these services.

Public Impact

Federal agencies rely on dashboards like CDM for critical cybersecurity and IT asset management. The effectiveness of this specific contract in enhancing federal data security and operational efficiency is a key public interest. Transparency in awarding large IT contracts is crucial for public trust and accountability. The long duration of the contract (2014-2019) suggests a substantial, ongoing need for these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The IT sector, particularly computer systems design services, is a significant area of federal spending. Benchmarks for similar large-scale system design contracts are highly variable, but awards often exceed tens of millions of dollars.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Federal agencies are expected to meet small business contracting goals, and large prime contracts like this often involve subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Oversight is critical to ensure the contractor meets performance requirements and that the Cost Plus Award Fee structure is managed effectively to control costs.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, general-services-administration, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $57.7 million to METRICA TEAM VENTURE. IGF::OT::IGF CDM DASHBOARD AWARD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is METRICA TEAM VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $57.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-03-03. End: 2019-09-02.

What specific performance metrics were used to justify the award fee, and how were they measured?

The performance metrics for the award fee are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, for a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract, these metrics would align with the contract's objectives, such as system uptime, data accuracy, security compliance, and timely delivery of features. The Contracting Officer's determination of the award fee is based on the contractor's performance against these pre-defined metrics.

How did the 'exclusion of sources' in the competition impact the final price and overall value?

Excluding sources limits the competitive pool, potentially leading to higher prices than a fully open competition. While the government may have had specific reasons for exclusion (e.g., specialized capabilities), it raises concerns about whether the best possible price and value were achieved. A thorough justification for the exclusion is necessary to assess its impact.

What is the estimated cost savings or efficiency gain achieved by the CDM Dashboard system under this contract?

The provided data does not include specific metrics on cost savings or efficiency gains. Evaluating the return on investment for this $57.7 million contract would require analyzing the system's impact on cybersecurity posture, reduction in IT asset management costs, and improved operational efficiency across federal agencies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 NE LOOP 410 STE 520, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78216

Business Categories: Category Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $79,736,116

Exercised Options: $79,736,116

Current Obligation: $57,683,119

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS06F0640Z

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2014-03-03

Current End Date: 2019-09-02

Potential End Date: 2019-09-02 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-04-08

More Contracts from Metrica Team Venture

View all Metrica Team Venture federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending