GSA Awards $30M Energy Savings Contract for Federal Building Retrofits
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $29,950,361 ($30.0M)
Contractor: Ameresco Inc
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2013-12-13
End Date: 2038-01-31
Contract Duration: 8,815 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 14
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Energy
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT TASK ORDER ISSUED AS PART OF GSA'S NATIONAL DEEP ENERGY RETROFIT PROGRAM. ESCO IS TO PERFORM ENERGY SAVINGS WORK AT SILVER SPRINGS METRO CENTER 1, LANHAM, MD AND AT THE NEW CARROLLTON FEDERAL BUILDING IN LANHAM, MD.
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20407
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $30.0 million to AMERESCO INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT TASK ORDER ISSUED AS PART OF GSA'S NATIONAL DEEP ENERGY RETROFIT PROGRAM. ESCO IS TO PERFORM ENERGY SAVINGS WORK AT SILVER SPRINGS METRO CENTER 1, LANHAM, MD AND AT THE NEW CARROLLTON FEDERAL BUILDING IN LANHAM, MD. Key points: 1. Significant investment in energy efficiency for federal facilities. 2. Competition method appears robust, potentially leading to good pricing. 3. Long contract duration (2038) presents long-term performance risk. 4. Focus on engineering services within the energy sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $29.95M for 8,815 days (approx. 24 years) suggests a substantial project. Benchmarking against similar large-scale energy retrofit contracts would be needed for a precise per-unit cost assessment, but the firm-fixed-price structure indicates a defined cost expectation.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing. The firm-fixed-price structure further supports price discovery by setting clear expectations upfront.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being invested in energy efficiency, which should lead to long-term cost savings for the government and reduced environmental impact.
Public Impact
Improved energy efficiency in federal buildings, reducing operational costs. Potential for reduced greenhouse gas emissions from federal facilities. Modernization of critical federal infrastructure. Job creation in the engineering and construction sectors. Demonstrates government commitment to sustainability goals.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long-term performance risk due to extended contract duration.
- Potential for scope creep or unforeseen technical challenges in retrofits.
- Dependence on ESCO's ability to deliver projected savings.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
- Focus on energy savings offers long-term financial benefits.
- Addresses critical infrastructure modernization.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the energy sector, specifically focusing on energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) for building retrofits. ESPCs are a common mechanism for federal agencies to finance energy efficiency upgrades without upfront capital investment, leveraging future energy savings to pay for the project. Benchmarks for similar large-scale ESPCs would typically consider project scope, building size, and energy reduction targets.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor, AMERESCO INC, is a large business, the specific subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not detailed in this data. Federal regulations typically require large prime contractors to outline plans for small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. As part of the Public Buildings Service, GSA's role includes ensuring efficient and cost-effective management of federal buildings. Oversight would focus on performance monitoring, verification of energy savings, and adherence to contract terms.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- General Services Administration Contracting
- Public Buildings Service Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration increases risk of obsolescence and changing conditions.
- Performance verification over 24 years may be challenging.
- Potential for unforeseen technical issues during deep energy retrofits.
- Reliance on future energy savings for cost recovery.
- No explicit small business participation noted in the data.
Tags
engineering-services, general-services-administration, dc, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $30.0 million to AMERESCO INC. IGF::OT::IGF ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT TASK ORDER ISSUED AS PART OF GSA'S NATIONAL DEEP ENERGY RETROFIT PROGRAM. ESCO IS TO PERFORM ENERGY SAVINGS WORK AT SILVER SPRINGS METRO CENTER 1, LANHAM, MD AND AT THE NEW CARROLLTON FEDERAL BUILDING IN LANHAM, MD.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMERESCO INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $30.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2013-12-13. End: 2038-01-31.
What is the projected annual energy cost savings, and how does it compare to the annual contract cost?
The projected annual energy cost savings are not explicitly stated in the provided data. However, the contract value of $29.95M over approximately 24 years implies an average annual cost of roughly $1.25M. The effectiveness of the contract hinges on the ESCO's ability to generate savings that exceed this annual cost, thereby providing a net benefit to the government and covering the project's investment.
What are the specific risks associated with the long duration (until 2038) of this energy savings contract?
The extended duration presents risks such as technological obsolescence of installed equipment, potential changes in energy prices making savings projections inaccurate, and difficulties in enforcing performance standards over such a long period. Furthermore, agency needs or building usage patterns might change, impacting the relevance of the original energy-saving measures. Long-term monitoring and adaptation strategies are crucial.
How effectively does the 'full and open competition' method ensure value for money in large energy retrofit projects like this?
Full and open competition generally promotes value for money by allowing multiple qualified contractors to bid, driving down prices through market forces. For large ESPCs, this method can attract specialized firms capable of complex retrofits. However, the effectiveness also depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria used, and the government's ability to accurately assess the technical proposals and projected savings offered by competing firms.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 14
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 111 SPEEN ST STE 410, FRAMINGHAM, MA, 01701
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $81,350,768
Exercised Options: $29,950,361
Current Obligation: $29,950,361
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DEAM3609GO29029
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2013-12-13
Current End Date: 2038-01-31
Potential End Date: 2038-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-06-22
More Contracts from Ameresco Inc
- Energy Savings Performance Contract, National Deep Energy Retrofit Program Round 7, Region 5 for Implementation of Energy Conservation Measures AT the Bean Federal Center, Indianapolis and 24 Other Buildings Indiana, Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin — $217.3M (General Services Administration)
- Energy Savings Performance Contract, National Deep Energy Retrofit Program Round 6, Region 8 for Implementation of Energy Conservation Measures AT the Denver Federal Center and the US Courthouse in Downtown Denver — $111.9M (General Services Administration)
- Veterans Integrated Service Network (visn) 7 Energy Savings Performance Contract (espc) — $94.7M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Butner Espc — $80.7M (Department of Justice)
- Energy Savings Performance Contract for Norfolk Naval Ship Yard, Portsmouth, Virginia — $74.3M (Department of Defense)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)