GSA's $16.9M Energy Savings Contract for 13 Federal Buildings Across AZ, NV, and CA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,889,078 ($16.9M)

Contractor: Ameresco Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2016-04-07

End Date: 2040-03-31

Contract Duration: 8,759 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Energy

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT. INVOLVES THE INSTALLATION AND LONG TERM MEASUREMENT&VERIFICATION OF ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR THE FOLLOWING ARIZONA BUILDINGS: PHOENIX FEDERAL BUILDING AND COURTHOUSE, SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR COURTHOUSE, WALSH COURTHOUSE, TUCSON FEDERAL BUILDING, EVO DECONCINI COURTHOUSE, AND BORDER PATROL SECTOR HEARQUARTERS; IN THE FOLLOWING NEVADA BUILDINGS: FOLEY FOB AND COURTHOUSE, LLOYD GEORGE COURTHOUSE, CLIFTON YOUNG FOB AND COURTHOUSE, BRUCE THOMPSON COURTHOUSE; AND IN THE FOLLOWING CALIFORNIA BUILDINGS: WEINBERGER COURTHOUSE, AND THE SCHWARTZ FOB AND COURTHOUSE.

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92101

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $16.9 million to AMERESCO INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT. INVOLVES THE INSTALLATION AND LONG TERM MEASUREMENT&VERIFICATION OF ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR THE FOLLOWING ARIZONA BUILDINGS: PHOENIX FEDERAL BUILDING AND COURTHOUSE, SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR COURTHOUSE, WALSH COURTHOUSE, TUCSO… Key points: 1. Significant investment in energy efficiency across multiple federal facilities. 2. Ameresco Inc. secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. Long-term performance contract with measurement and verification is a key feature. 4. Potential for substantial taxpayer savings through reduced energy consumption.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $16.9M over 20 years suggests a moderate annual investment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale energy performance contracts would be necessary for a precise value assessment, but the scope indicates a competitive pricing strategy.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, allowing multiple vendors to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The primary taxpayer impact is the initial investment, offset by projected long-term energy cost savings and improved facility performance.

Public Impact

Modernization of critical federal infrastructure to improve energy efficiency. Potential for reduced greenhouse gas emissions from federal buildings. Creation of jobs in the energy services and construction sectors. Enhanced operational resilience and reduced utility costs for federal agencies. Long-term commitment to sustainability goals for federal properties.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract duration extends significantly, requiring ongoing monitoring.
Performance metrics and verification processes are critical for realizing savings.
Dependence on a single contractor for long-term energy management.

Positive Signals

Focus on measurable energy savings provides clear performance indicators.
Competition ensures a baseline of value for the investment.
Long-term nature allows for sustained improvements and operational efficiencies.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically related to energy efficiency and building modernization. Spending benchmarks for similar large-scale energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) vary widely based on scope and building types, but this $16.9M award is substantial.

Small Business Impact

While the prime contractor is Ameresco Inc., the contract details do not specify any subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further investigation would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees this contract. The measurement and verification component is crucial for accountability, ensuring that the promised energy savings are realized and that taxpayer funds are used effectively.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
Dependence on contractor's M&V accuracy.
Potential for scope creep or change orders.
Ensuring actual energy savings meet projections.
Cybersecurity risks associated with smart building technology.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $16.9 million to AMERESCO INC. IGF::OT::IGF ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT. INVOLVES THE INSTALLATION AND LONG TERM MEASUREMENT&VERIFICATION OF ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR THE FOLLOWING ARIZONA BUILDINGS: PHOENIX FEDERAL BUILDING AND COURTHOUSE, SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR COURTHOUSE, WALSH COURTHOUSE, TUCSON FEDERAL BUILDING, EVO DECONCINI COURTHOUSE, AND BORDER PATROL SECTOR HEARQUARTERS; IN THE FOLLOWING NEVADA BUILDINGS: FOLEY FOB AND COURTHOUSE, LLOYD GEORGE COURTHOUSE, CLIFTON YOUNG FOB AND COURTHOUSE, BRUCE THOMPSON

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMERESCO INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-04-07. End: 2040-03-31.

What are the projected energy savings and payback period for this contract?

The specific projected energy savings and payback period are not detailed in the provided data. Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) are designed to generate savings that cover the project costs over time. A thorough review of the contract's performance work statement and financial projections would be required to determine these figures and assess the true value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for measuring the success of these energy conservation measures?

Key performance indicators would likely include reductions in electricity consumption (kWh), natural gas usage (therms/MMBtu), water consumption, and associated utility costs. The contract's measurement and verification (M&V) plan would define the specific metrics, baseline data, and methodologies for tracking and reporting these savings over the contract's lifespan.

How does the 'firm fixed price' structure impact the risk for both the government and the contractor?

A firm fixed price (FFP) contract shifts most of the cost risk to the contractor. For the government, it provides budget certainty. However, if unforeseen issues arise during implementation that increase costs, the contractor bears the burden, potentially impacting their motivation or the quality of work if not managed carefully.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 111 SPEEN ST STE 410, FRAMINGHAM, MA, 01701

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $43,903,929

Exercised Options: $18,610,554

Current Obligation: $16,889,078

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DEAM3609GO29029

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline