GSA awards $17M for pre-construction services at Goodfellow Federal Center, Missouri

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,061,469 ($17.1M)

Contractor: Oke-Thomas+associates, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2009-11-13

End Date: 2011-06-17

Contract Duration: 581 days

Daily Burn Rate: $29.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: GOODFELLOW FEDERAL CENTER, 4300 GOODFELLOW BLVD BLDG 110, ST. LOUIS, MO 63120 BUILDING #MO0618AF THE WORK TO BE DELIVERED UNDER THIS TASK ORDER INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THESE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: DESIGN REVIEW FOR RENOVATION TO INCLUDE HVAC UPGRADE, AND DEMOLITION SERVICES ON BUILDING 110.

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS CITY County, MISSOURI, 63120

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $17.1 million to OKE-THOMAS+ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: GOODFELLOW FEDERAL CENTER, 4300 GOODFELLOW BLVD BLDG 110, ST. LOUIS, MO 63120 BUILDING #MO0618AF THE WORK TO BE DELIVERED UNDER THIS TASK ORDER INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THESE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: DESIGN REVIEW FOR RENOVATION TO INCLUDE HVAC UPGRADE, AND DEMOLITION SE… Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for pre-construction design review and demolition services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Project duration of approximately 1.5 years is standard for this type of work. 5. The contract supports infrastructure modernization at a federal facility.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $17.06 million for pre-construction services, including design review for HVAC upgrades and demolition, seems aligned with the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar federal pre-construction contracts for building renovations of this size and complexity would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract offers cost certainty to the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited and evaluated. The presence of 5 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this pre-construction services requirement. This competitive environment generally leads to better pricing and service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

The General Services Administration (GSA) benefits from improved facility planning and execution. The project will deliver essential pre-construction services for the renovation of Building 110. The geographic impact is localized to St. Louis, Missouri, where the federal center is located. The contract supports the construction and engineering workforce through design and demolition planning.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if initial design review uncovers unforeseen complexities.
Dependence on contractor's expertise for accurate demolition and renovation planning.
Risk of delays if permitting or regulatory approvals are not secured promptly.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract limits financial exposure for the government.
Full and open competition likely resulted in competitive pricing.
Clear definition of pre-construction services reduces ambiguity.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically focusing on pre-construction services. The market for such services is driven by federal, state, and private sector investments in infrastructure and facility modernization. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other federal contracts for similar design review and demolition planning services for government buildings.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor is OKE-THOMAS+ASSOCIATES, INC., the subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would depend on the prime's own subcontracting plan and the nature of the pre-construction services required. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver the specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through federal contract databases and reporting requirements.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Renovations
Architectural and Engineering Services
Demolition Services
Infrastructure Modernization Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.
Dependence on contractor's expertise for accurate planning.
Risk of delays due to external factors (permitting, etc.).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $17.1 million to OKE-THOMAS+ASSOCIATES, INC.. GOODFELLOW FEDERAL CENTER, 4300 GOODFELLOW BLVD BLDG 110, ST. LOUIS, MO 63120 BUILDING #MO0618AF THE WORK TO BE DELIVERED UNDER THIS TASK ORDER INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THESE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: DESIGN REVIEW FOR RENOVATION TO INCLUDE HVAC UPGRADE, AND DEMOLITION SERVICES ON BUILDING 110.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is OKE-THOMAS+ASSOCIATES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-11-13. End: 2011-06-17.

What is the track record of OKE-THOMAS+ASSOCIATES, INC. with federal contracts, particularly with GSA?

A review of federal contract databases would be necessary to fully assess OKE-THOMAS+ASSOCIATES, INC.'s track record. This would involve examining past performance on similar contracts, including their size, scope, and agency. Specifically, looking at their history with the General Services Administration (GSA) and their performance on construction-related services would provide insight into their reliability and capability. Any past performance issues, such as cost overruns, schedule delays, or quality deficiencies, would be critical to note. Conversely, a history of successful project completion within budget and schedule would be a positive indicator.

How does the $17.06 million contract value compare to similar pre-construction service contracts for federal buildings?

Benchmarking this $17.06 million contract against similar pre-construction service contracts requires access to a comprehensive database of federal procurements. Factors to consider include the size and type of building being renovated (Building 110), the specific services included (design review for HVAC, demolition), and the geographic location. Contracts for similar scope and scale awarded by GSA or other agencies in recent years would serve as the most relevant comparators. Without specific benchmark data, it's difficult to definitively state if the price is high or low, but the fixed-price nature suggests an effort to control costs.

What are the primary risks associated with this pre-construction services contract?

The primary risks associated with this pre-construction services contract include potential scope creep if the initial design review uncovers unforeseen complexities in the existing HVAC system or building structure that were not apparent during the initial assessment. There is also a risk related to the accuracy and completeness of the demolition plan, which could impact subsequent renovation phases. Furthermore, delays in obtaining necessary permits or regulatory approvals, which are often outside the direct control of the contractor but crucial for project progression, pose a significant risk. The contractor's ability to accurately estimate demolition scope and costs is also a key risk factor.

How effective are firm fixed-price contracts in managing costs for federal construction projects like this one?

Firm fixed-price (FFP) contracts are generally considered effective in managing costs for federal construction projects because they shift the majority of the cost risk from the government to the contractor. Under an FFP contract, the contractor agrees to a set price for the work, and any cost overruns are absorbed by the contractor, while any savings are retained by the contractor. This incentivizes the contractor to be efficient and control costs. However, for complex projects with inherent uncertainties, contractors may build in higher contingency amounts into their initial bids to protect against unforeseen issues, potentially leading to a higher initial price compared to other contract types. For pre-construction services, where the scope can be somewhat defined, FFP is a suitable choice for cost control.

What is the historical spending pattern for pre-construction services at the Goodfellow Federal Center or similar GSA facilities?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for pre-construction services at the Goodfellow Federal Center or similar GSA facilities would require accessing GSA's historical contract data. This would involve identifying previous task orders or contracts for design review, demolition planning, or other pre-construction activities at this specific location or comparable federal buildings managed by GSA. Trends in contract values, number of bidders, and contract types over time would reveal patterns. For instance, a history of frequent, small pre-construction contracts might indicate ongoing minor upgrades, while a large single contract could suggest a major renovation. Understanding these patterns helps contextualize the current $17.06 million award.

What are the implications of 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' NAICS code for this contract?

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220, 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction,' signifies that the primary business activity of the contractor is involved in the construction or renovation of non-residential buildings. For this specific contract, it means the work performed, even though it's pre-construction services, is directly related to the eventual construction or renovation of a commercial/institutional facility (a federal building). This classification helps in categorizing the contract for statistical purposes, understanding the industry sector involved, and potentially identifying relevant industry standards and regulations that apply to the contractor and the work.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1972 E CHESTNUT EXPY, SPRINGFIELD, MO, 65802

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Emerging Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,061,469

Exercised Options: $17,061,469

Current Obligation: $17,061,469

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS06P07GYD0015

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline