GSA's $53.7M Energy Retrofit Contract with NORESCO, LLC Shows Long-Term Performance Focus
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $53,732,103 ($53.7M)
Contractor: Noresco, LLC
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2014-01-01
End Date: 2023-06-30
Contract Duration: 3,467 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 15
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Energy
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF DE-AM36-09G0229039/GS-P-05-14-GA-0004,GSA NATIONAL DEEP ENERGY RETROFIT (NDER), ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT (ESPC) TASK ORDER, FOR REGION 5, NORESCO, LLC, METCALFE FEDERAL BUILDING, 536 S. CLARK FEDERAL BUILDING, U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE, FEDERAL ARCHIVES&RECORDS CENTER, EVERETT M. DIRKSEN U.S. COURTHOUSE, JOHN C. KLUCZYNSKI FEDERAL BUILDING, AND U.S. POST OFFICE/LOOP STATION, CHICAGO, IL.
Place of Performance
Location: CHICAGO, COOK County, ILLINOIS, 60604
State: Illinois Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $53.7 million to NORESCO, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF DE-AM36-09G0229039/GS-P-05-14-GA-0004,GSA NATIONAL DEEP ENERGY RETROFIT (NDER), ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT (ESPC) TASK ORDER, FOR REGION 5, NORESCO, LLC, METCALFE FEDERAL BUILDING, 536 S. CLARK FEDERAL BUILDING, U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE, FEDERAL ARCHIVES&RECORDS CE… Key points: 1. This contract represents a significant investment in energy efficiency for federal buildings in Chicago. 2. The long duration (over 9 years) suggests a focus on sustained performance and measurable energy savings. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs and ensure predictable spending. 4. Competition was full and open, indicating a broad market engagement for this service. 5. The contract's value is substantial, reflecting the scale of the retrofitting project. 6. Performance is tied to energy savings, a key value-for-money indicator. 7. The specific buildings targeted suggest a strategic approach to upgrading critical federal infrastructure.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $53.7 million over nearly 10 years for energy retrofitting services is substantial. While direct comparisons are difficult without specific project scopes, Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) are designed to be cost-neutral or cost-saving through guaranteed energy reductions. The long-term nature suggests a commitment to achieving these savings. Benchmarking against similar large-scale federal building retrofits would provide further context on pricing efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified contractors had the opportunity to bid. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing. The number of bidders (15) indicates a healthy interest in this type of federal contract, further supporting the likelihood of a well-priced award.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces, ensuring that federal dollars are used more efficiently.
Public Impact
Federal employees working in the Metcalfe Federal Building, U.S. Custom House, Federal Archives & Records Center, Everett M. Dirksen U.S. Courthouse, John C. Kluczynski Federal Building, and U.S. Post Office/Loop Station will benefit from improved building environments. The contract delivers energy retrofitting services, aiming to reduce utility consumption and operational costs for these federal facilities. The geographic impact is concentrated in Chicago, Illinois, improving the energy efficiency of key federal properties in the region. The project supports the energy services sector and potentially creates or sustains jobs in engineering, construction, and energy management.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration could pose risks if energy savings projections are not met over the full term.
- Reliance on a single contractor (NORESCO, LLC) for a large project requires robust oversight to ensure performance.
- Potential for scope creep or unforeseen technical challenges in retrofitting older federal buildings.
Positive Signals
- Focus on energy savings aligns with federal sustainability goals and potential long-term cost reductions.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive award process.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) and Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) sector. ESPCs are a key mechanism for federal agencies to improve energy efficiency and reduce utility costs without upfront capital appropriations. The market for energy retrofitting and performance contracting is substantial, driven by government mandates for sustainability and cost savings. This contract with NORESCO, LLC, a known player in the energy services market, fits within the broader trend of federal agencies modernizing their infrastructure.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. The award to NORESCO, LLC, a large energy services company, suggests that the primary contract was likely competed broadly. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors, which is common in large construction and retrofitting projects.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. As an Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC), there are inherent performance metrics tied to energy savings that serve as a key accountability measure. The contract's long duration necessitates ongoing monitoring of energy usage and savings. Transparency would be enhanced through regular reporting from the contractor and potential reviews by GSA's internal oversight bodies or the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
Related Government Programs
- Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs)
- Federal Building Modernization Programs
- GSA Public Buildings Service Contracts
- Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants
- Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program
Risk Flags
- Long-term performance risk
- Accuracy of energy savings projections
- Contractor performance and oversight needs
- Potential for technological obsolescence
Tags
energy-savings-performance-contract, espcs, general-services-administration, gsa, public-buildings-service, pbc, engineering-services, chicago, illinois, federal-buildings, retrofitting, full-and-open-competition
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $53.7 million to NORESCO, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF DE-AM36-09G0229039/GS-P-05-14-GA-0004,GSA NATIONAL DEEP ENERGY RETROFIT (NDER), ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACT (ESPC) TASK ORDER, FOR REGION 5, NORESCO, LLC, METCALFE FEDERAL BUILDING, 536 S. CLARK FEDERAL BUILDING, U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE, FEDERAL ARCHIVES&RECORDS CENTER, EVERETT M. DIRKSEN U.S. COURTHOUSE, JOHN C. KLUCZYNSKI FEDERAL BUILDING, AND U.S. POST OFFICE/LOOP STATION, CHICAGO, IL.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORESCO, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $53.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2014-01-01. End: 2023-06-30.
What is the historical spending pattern for Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) by the General Services Administration?
The General Services Administration (GSA) has historically utilized Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) as a significant tool for improving energy efficiency in its vast portfolio of federal buildings. While specific aggregate spending figures for GSA's ESPCs fluctuate annually, they represent a substantial portion of the agency's sustainability and infrastructure upgrade investments. ESPCs allow GSA to implement energy conservation measures without upfront capital costs, with repayment coming from the documented energy savings achieved. The total value of ESPCs awarded by federal agencies has been in the billions of dollars over the past decade, with GSA being a major contributor. Factors influencing spending include appropriations for energy management, agency-wide sustainability mandates, and the availability of qualified Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) like NORESCO, LLC. Analyzing GSA's budget justifications and annual performance reports would provide more granular historical spending data on ESPCs.
How does the $53.7 million value of this NORESCO, LLC contract compare to other GSA ESPCs?
The $53.7 million value of this Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) awarded to NORESCO, LLC by the General Services Administration (GSA) is a significant, but not unprecedented, figure for large-scale federal building retrofits. GSA manages a massive inventory of buildings, and ESPCs can range from a few million dollars for smaller projects to tens of millions for comprehensive overhauls of multiple large facilities. Contracts in the $50 million to $100 million range are common for major ESPC task orders or indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) task orders that encompass multiple buildings or extensive upgrades. For instance, other ESPCs awarded by GSA or other agencies for major campus retrofits or portfolios of buildings have reached similar or even higher values. The long performance period (over 9 years) also contributes to the total contract value. Therefore, while substantial, this contract is in line with the scale of major ESPC initiatives undertaken by GSA to achieve significant energy savings across its real estate holdings.
What are the primary risks associated with a long-term (9+ year) ESPC like this one?
Long-term Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs), such as this 9+ year agreement, carry several inherent risks. A primary concern is the accuracy of the energy savings projections made at the outset. If actual energy savings fall short of projections due to unforeseen building performance issues, changes in building usage, or inadequate maintenance, the contractor may not meet its guaranteed savings, potentially leading to disputes or the government not realizing the expected financial benefits. Another risk is technological obsolescence; while the retrofits are intended to be durable, advancements in energy efficiency technology could make the installed systems less optimal over the contract's lifespan. Contractor performance risk is also present; ensuring consistent quality and responsiveness from NORESCO, LLC over nearly a decade requires diligent contract management and oversight from GSA. Finally, changes in federal energy policy or budget priorities could indirectly impact the perceived value or necessity of the contract's ongoing savings.
How is the 'performance' in this Energy Savings Performance Contract measured and verified?
Performance in an Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) is fundamentally measured by the verified reduction in energy consumption and associated costs. For this contract with NORESCO, LLC, the 'performance' is tied to the guaranteed energy savings achieved in the specified Chicago federal buildings. Measurement and Verification (M&V) protocols are crucial and are typically established in the contract itself, often following established methodologies like the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP). GSA, through its Public Buildings Service, would be responsible for overseeing the M&V process. This involves regularly monitoring utility data, building system performance, and occupancy levels to calculate the actual energy savings realized compared to a baseline established before the retrofits. The contractor, NORESCO, LLC, is obligated to provide regular M&V reports, and GSA would independently verify these findings to ensure the savings guarantees are met. If savings fall short, the contractor is typically required to compensate the agency.
What is NORESCO, LLC's track record with federal ESPCs?
NORESCO, LLC has a significant and established track record as an Energy Service Company (ESCO) working with federal agencies, including the General Services Administration (GSA). They are a well-recognized provider of energy efficiency solutions and performance-based contracts across various sectors. NORESCO has been involved in numerous large-scale ESPC projects for federal facilities, encompassing a wide range of energy conservation measures such as HVAC upgrades, lighting retrofits, building envelope improvements, and renewable energy installations. Their history includes successfully delivering projects that meet guaranteed energy savings targets and contribute to federal sustainability goals. Given their longevity and the scale of projects they undertake, it can be inferred that they have experience navigating the complexities of federal contracting, compliance, and performance verification required for ESPCs. This specific contract, valued at over $53 million, further underscores their capacity to handle substantial federal energy retrofitting initiatives.
What are the potential long-term cost savings for taxpayers resulting from this $53.7M investment?
The primary objective of this $53.7 million Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) is to generate long-term cost savings for taxpayers through reduced energy expenditures in federal buildings. While the exact savings are guaranteed by NORESCO, LLC and depend on the specific retrofits and energy prices, ESPCs are structured so that the annual savings generated are intended to cover the contract's costs and provide a net benefit. Over the contract's duration of nearly 10 years, and potentially beyond if savings persist, the cumulative reduction in electricity, natural gas, and water bills for the targeted Chicago federal buildings could be substantial. These savings directly reduce the operational costs funded by taxpayers. Furthermore, by improving energy efficiency, these retrofits contribute to federal sustainability mandates and reduce the government's carbon footprint, offering indirect societal benefits. The firm-fixed-price nature helps ensure that the government pays a set amount, making the financial planning for these savings more predictable.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 15
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 RESEARCH DR STE 400 C, WESTBOROUGH, MA, 01581
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $80,443,630
Exercised Options: $53,732,103
Current Obligation: $53,732,103
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 9
Total Subaward Amount: $33,484,712
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DEAM3609GO29039
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2014-01-01
Current End Date: 2023-06-30
Potential End Date: 2023-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-06-13
More Contracts from Noresco, LLC
- - Closely Associated - These Requirements Have Been Developed for VA Visn 11 to PUT Forth Government Identified ECM Projects AT Visn 11 Facilities to Reduce Energy Consumption, Water Consumption and Associated Utility Costs, and Energy-Related Operations and Maintenance Costs — $121.8M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Espc Projects for FCI Fort DIX and FDC Philadelphia — $73.6M (Department of Justice)
- 200311!190367!1700!C7408 !naval Facilities Engineering Com!deam3699ee73680!c!n! !N!N4740803F5272 !20030825!20080825!606727402!606727402!007915663!n!noresco, LLC !ONE Research Drive !westborough !ma!01581!57000!710!51!norfolk !norfolk (city) !virginia !+000003000000!n!n!000000000000!r799!other Management Support Services !S1 !services !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A! !J! !030!A! !C! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! !z!z!a!a!000! !C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $61.4M (Department of Defense)
- Utility Monitoring Control System — $49.0M (Department of Defense)
- Marion and Milan Espc Project — $46.0M (Department of Justice)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)