GSA's $14.5M Facilities Contract for Delaware Valley Field Office Awarded to CTS-WW, JV Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,549,789 ($14.5M)

Contractor: Cts-Ww, JV

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2009-10-16

End Date: 2014-10-31

Contract Duration: 1,841 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FULL BASE PERIOD SERVICES (11/01/2009 - 10/31/2011): FACILITIES ENGINEERING / OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE DELAWARE VALLEY FIELD OFFICE.

Place of Performance

Location: CAMDEN, CAMDEN County, NEW JERSEY, 08101, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $14.5 million to CTS-WW, JV for work described as: FULL BASE PERIOD SERVICES (11/01/2009 - 10/31/2011): FACILITIES ENGINEERING / OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE DELAWARE VALLEY FIELD OFFICE. Key points: 1. Contract value of $14.5M over its base period and option years suggests a significant investment in facilities operations. 2. The award to CTS-WW, JV indicates a competitive selection process, likely resulting in favorable pricing for the government. 3. The duration of the contract (over 5 years) implies a need for stable, long-term facilities management services. 4. The 'Facilities Support Services' NAICS code points to a broad range of operational and maintenance activities. 5. The contract's fixed-price nature shifts performance risk to the contractor, potentially stabilizing costs. 6. The absence of small business set-aside suggests the scope or nature of services may not have been tailored for smaller entities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value of $14.5 million over its extended period (base plus options) for facilities engineering, operations, and maintenance services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities management contracts awarded by the GSA or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price contract type suggests that the contractor bears the primary risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government in stable service environments.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. With 12 bidders participating, the competition level was robust. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors, suggesting the government likely received a fair market price for the services rendered.

Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely drove down costs through aggressive bidding, ensuring that federal funds were used efficiently for essential facilities management.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors at the Delaware Valley Field Office benefit from well-maintained and operational facilities. Essential services such as engineering, operations, and maintenance ensure the continuity of government operations at the site. The contract supports the physical infrastructure managed by the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for skilled trades and facility management professionals employed by the prime contractor and potentially subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost creep if scope is not tightly managed, despite fixed-price structure.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical facility operations could pose a risk if performance falters.
Ensuring consistent quality across all maintenance and engineering tasks requires diligent oversight.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition with 12 bidders suggests a strong market response and likely competitive pricing.
Firm fixed-price contract shifts performance risk to the contractor.
Long contract duration provides stability for service delivery and planning.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of the commercial real estate and government services industries. This sector encompasses a wide range of activities, including building operations, maintenance, repair, and specialized engineering services. The market for these services is substantial, driven by the need to maintain vast portfolios of government and commercial properties efficiently and cost-effectively. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large federal contracts for similar facility management services across different agencies and geographic regions.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the 'sb' field indicates 'false'. This suggests that the scale and complexity of the required facilities engineering, operations, and maintenance services were likely beyond the typical capacity or scope of small business set-aside programs. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, but given the nature of facilities management, it is common for prime contractors to utilize small businesses for specialized trades or local services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service, which is responsible for federal building management. Accountability measures are embedded within the contract's firm fixed-price structure and performance requirements. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases where award details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
Public Buildings Service Operations and Maintenance
Government Facilities Management Contracts
General Services Administration Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for performance degradation if contractor prioritizes profit over quality.
Need for robust government oversight to ensure contract compliance and service standards.
Risk associated with long-term reliance on a single provider for critical infrastructure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $14.5 million to CTS-WW, JV. FULL BASE PERIOD SERVICES (11/01/2009 - 10/31/2011): FACILITIES ENGINEERING / OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE DELAWARE VALLEY FIELD OFFICE.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CTS-WW, JV.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-10-16. End: 2014-10-31.

What is the historical spending trend for facilities engineering and operations at the Delaware Valley Field Office?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award of $14,549,789.04 for the base period (11/01/2009 - 10/31/2011) and option years, ending 10/31/2014. This represents the total value across the contract's life, not just the base period. To understand historical spending trends, one would need to examine prior contracts for these services at the same facility, or analyze the annual spending under this specific contract if it were broken down by year. Without access to that granular data, we can only infer that the GSA allocated this significant sum to ensure the continuous operation and maintenance of the Delaware Valley Field Office facilities over the contract period.

How does the number of bidders (12) compare to similar GSA facilities management contracts?

A competition level with 12 bidders for a facilities management contract, especially one awarded by the GSA under full and open competition, is generally considered robust. For large-scale, complex service contracts, the number of interested and capable firms can vary significantly. However, a dozen bidders suggests strong market interest and a healthy competitive environment. This number is often seen as a positive indicator that the solicitation was well-publicized and that the contract requirements were clear enough to attract a wide range of potential offerors. Lower numbers might indicate market saturation, lack of qualified bidders, or overly restrictive requirements.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) typically associated with Facilities Support Services contracts like this one?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Facilities Support Services contracts typically revolve around operational efficiency, safety, and client satisfaction. Common KPIs include response times for service requests (e.g., maintenance, repairs), preventative maintenance completion rates, energy consumption efficiency, building system uptime (HVAC, electrical, plumbing), safety incident rates (e.g., workplace accidents), pest control effectiveness, and janitorial cleanliness standards. For this specific contract, the GSA would have defined specific measurable standards within the Performance Work Statement (PWS) that CTS-WW, JV was required to meet. Failure to meet these KPIs would likely result in contractually defined remedies, such as service level credits or even termination.

What is the risk profile of a firm fixed-price contract for facilities management services?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract for facilities management services generally carries a moderate to low risk for the government, provided the scope of work is well-defined and stable. The primary risk for the government is that the contractor might cut corners on quality or service to maximize profit if oversight is insufficient. However, the FFP structure places the risk of cost overruns squarely on the contractor, incentivizing them to manage resources efficiently and control costs. This contract type is suitable when the scope of work is clearly understood and unlikely to change significantly. For facilities management, where many tasks are routine and predictable, FFP is often a preferred choice for cost certainty.

How does the NAICS code 561210 (Facilities Support Services) encompass the services described in the contract?

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210, 'Facilities Support Services,' is a broad category that accurately encompasses the services described for this contract: 'FACILITIES ENGINEERING / OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES'. This code covers establishments that provide a variety of support services to other businesses and organizations, such as building operation and maintenance, cleaning, security, and related services. Specifically, it includes establishments primarily engaged in operating and maintaining buildings, such as building management companies. The engineering, operations, and maintenance aspects mentioned in the contract description fall directly under the purview of this NAICS code, indicating a comprehensive facilities management role.

What does the 'AW: DO' designation signify in the contract data?

The 'AW: DO' designation in the contract data likely stands for 'Awarding Agency: Department of Defense' or a similar federal entity, however, the provided 'ag' field states 'General Services Administration'. It's possible 'DO' refers to a specific office or division within the awarding agency responsible for the procurement, or it could be an internal code. Given the 'ag' field is 'General Services Administration', 'DO' might represent a specific Service Center or Directorate within GSA that handled this award. Without further context or a data dictionary for this specific dataset, its precise meaning remains ambiguous, but it generally points to the entity or sub-entity that finalized the award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 115 W. MULBERRY STREET, BALTIMORE, MD, 21201

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,549,789

Exercised Options: $14,549,789

Current Obligation: $14,549,789

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS03P09AZD0015

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline