NASA Awards $218M Facilities Engineering Contract to Parsons Government Services Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $218,247,874 ($218.2M)
Contractor: Parsons Government Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2000-08-15
End Date: 2011-08-31
Contract Duration: 4,033 days
Daily Burn Rate: $54.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: FACILITIES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT THE GSFC
Place of Performance
Location: GREENBELT, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20771, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $218.2 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC. for work described as: FACILITIES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT THE GSFC Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Parsons Government Services Inc. for facilities engineering and construction. 2. Significant contract value of $218.2 million over its duration. 3. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract spans over 10 years, indicating a long-term need for these services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $218.2 million over 10 years suggests a substantial investment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities engineering contracts would be necessary for a precise pricing assessment, but the duration and scope imply a fair market value was likely sought through competition.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of bidders and fosters price discovery. This method is generally expected to yield competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value services at competitive prices.
Public Impact
Supports critical NASA facilities operations at Goddard Space Flight Center. Ensures infrastructure maintenance and development for a key scientific agency. Long-term contract provides stability for service provider and agency planning.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term construction and engineering projects.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities management.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Long-term contract provides service continuity.
- Supports a vital government agency's mission.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under facilities support services, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and construction for government facilities. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on agency needs, infrastructure age, and new construction projects.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were mandated or pursued.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by NASA, a federal agency with established oversight mechanisms. The duration and value necessitate ongoing monitoring to ensure performance and cost control.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to specialized services.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
- Scope creep in large construction projects.
Tags
facilities-support-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, dca, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $218.2 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.. FACILITIES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT THE GSFC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $218.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2000-08-15. End: 2011-08-31.
What specific types of facilities engineering and construction services were included in this contract, and how do they align with NASA's current and future mission needs?
The contract encompassed a range of facilities support services, likely including maintenance, repair, upgrades, and potentially new construction for the Goddard Space Flight Center. Alignment with NASA's mission would depend on whether these services directly supported research, launch operations, or administrative functions, and if the scope anticipated future technological or programmatic shifts.
Given the 10-year duration, what mechanisms were in place to manage potential scope creep and ensure cost control throughout the contract's life?
Long-term contracts typically include provisions for change management, performance metrics, and regular reviews. Mechanisms to control scope creep and costs might involve detailed task orders, phased delivery schedules, clear performance standards, and negotiation protocols for any contract modifications. The firm-fixed-price structure also aims to cap costs, though adjustments for significant unforeseen issues are often possible.
How did the full and open competition process ensure that Parsons Government Services Inc. offered the most cost-effective and technically superior solution compared to other potential bidders?
Full and open competition allows multiple qualified vendors to submit proposals, fostering a competitive environment. Evaluation criteria, likely including technical approach, past performance, and price, would have been used to select the best value. The agency would have assessed which proposal best met requirements at a reasonable cost, with the winning bid presumed to be the most advantageous.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Parsons Corporation (UEI: 030866545)
Address: 100 W WALNUT ST, PASADENA, CA, 91124
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $218,247,874
Exercised Options: $218,247,874
Current Obligation: $218,247,874
Timeline
Start Date: 2000-08-15
Current End Date: 2011-08-31
Potential End Date: 2011-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-06-22
More Contracts from Parsons Government Services Inc.
- Salt Waste Processing Facility Conceptual Design — $2.3B (Department of Energy)
- THE Contractor Must Furnish ALL Professional, Technical and Support Labor, Material, Supplies, Management Services, Data, and Facilities Required to Accomplish the Work to BE Ordered Under Technical F Igf::ot::igf — $1.5B (Department of Transportation)
- EO14042 Teams-Next Missile Defense Systems Engineering — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Execute an Administrative Continuance of the Task Order, and Transfers the Administration From Region 1 to Fedsim — $612.4M (General Services Administration)
View all Parsons Government Services Inc. federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →