GSA Awards $30.8M Pavilion Construction Contract to Gilbane Building Company via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,827,126 ($30.8M)

Contractor: Gilbane Building Company

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2014-04-30

End Date: 2017-02-15

Contract Duration: 1,022 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR FOR THE USDC PHASE 1 -PAVILION

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20407

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $30.8 million to GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR FOR THE USDC PHASE 1 -PAVILION Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Pavilion construction, a significant infrastructure project. 2. Gilbane Building Company, a large firm, secured the contract. 3. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The project falls under commercial and institutional building construction. 5. The contract value is substantial at $30.8 million.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $30.8M for a pavilion construction project appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects would provide a more precise assessment, but the firm-fixed-price structure suggests cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offer.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently, with the government securing services at a market-driven price.

Public Impact

Public access to the Pavilion may be enhanced by this construction. Local economic impact through job creation and material sourcing is expected. The project contributes to the modernization of public infrastructure. Transparency in government spending is upheld through competitive bidding. The successful completion of the pavilion could improve public services or amenities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
Potential for cost overruns if scope changes occur.
Dependence on a single large contractor for a major project.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Experienced contractor selected.
Project contributes to public infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. The $30.8 million award is a significant investment, and benchmarks for similar projects would typically consider factors like square footage, complexity, and location.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that neither small business set-aside nor subcontracting goals were explicitly mentioned for this contract. This suggests that the primary awardee is a large business, and opportunities for small businesses may be limited unless they are part of the supply chain or subcontracted by the prime.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Oversight would typically involve monitoring project progress, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and managing any change orders to maintain cost and schedule integrity.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
General Services Administration Contracting
Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep leading to cost increases.
Dependence on a single large contractor.
Long project duration increases exposure to market volatility.
Lack of explicit small business participation targets.
No clear performance metrics provided in the summary data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $30.8 million to GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY. IGF::CT::IGF GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR FOR THE USDC PHASE 1 -PAVILION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-04-30. End: 2017-02-15.

What specific features or scope of work does the Pavilion entail, and how does this justify the $30.8 million cost?

The provided data lacks specific details on the Pavilion's scope. A comprehensive analysis would require reviewing the contract's statement of work, architectural plans, and detailed cost breakdowns. Factors like size, materials, specialized features (e.g., LEED certification, technological integration), and site preparation complexity would contribute to the overall cost. Without this information, a precise justification is difficult, but the firm-fixed-price nature suggests the contractor has accounted for these elements.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will their achievement be measured to ensure project success and taxpayer value?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this construction contract. Typically, for such projects, KPIs would include adherence to schedule, budget compliance, quality of workmanship, safety record, and meeting specified design and functional requirements. The GSA's oversight would involve regular site inspections, progress reports, and potentially third-party quality assurance checks to monitor these aspects and ensure the project delivers the intended value.

Given the contract duration of 1022 days (approx. 2.8 years), what are the potential risks associated with material price fluctuations or labor availability, and how were these mitigated in the contra

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract structure implies that Gilbane Building Company assumed the risk of material price fluctuations and labor availability. To mitigate these risks, the contractor likely incorporated contingencies into their bid, secured material prices early, or established agreements with subcontractors and suppliers. The GSA's role would be to ensure the initial bid adequately reflected these risks and that the contractor is managing them effectively throughout the project lifecycle.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Gilbane, Inc. (UEI: 022726165)

Address: 7901 SANDY SPRING RD, LAUREL, MD, 20707

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,827,126

Exercised Options: $30,827,126

Current Obligation: $30,827,126

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline