GSA's $12.5M training support contract awarded to Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,498,328 ($12.5M)

Contractor: Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2008-01-03

End Date: 2012-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,732 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TRAINING SUPPORT AND SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: FORT HUACHUCA, COCHISE County, ARIZONA, 85613, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $12.5 million to ALUTIIQ INTERNATIONAL SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: TRAINING SUPPORT AND SERVICES Key points: 1. The contract's value of approximately $12.5 million over its duration suggests a significant investment in training services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this contract likely benefited from a competitive bidding process. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type indicates that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns. 4. The contract duration of 1732 days (approximately 4.7 years) allowed for sustained support. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541519 points to a focus on 'Other Computer Related Services,' which may encompass the technical aspects of training delivery. 6. The contract was awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), a key federal procurement agency.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific details on the training services provided and the number of individuals trained. However, a total value of $12.5 million spread over nearly five years suggests an average annual spend of approximately $2.6 million. This figure needs to be compared against the scope and quality of the training delivered to determine true value for money. The firm-fixed-price nature of the award implies that the contractor bore the financial risk, which can be a positive indicator of cost control if the contractor was successful.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this requirement. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, three offers indicate that the opportunity was attractive enough to elicit interest from multiple firms, providing a basis for price comparison.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

Federal employees likely benefited from enhanced skills and knowledge through the training services provided. The contract supported the delivery of training, potentially covering a range of subjects relevant to government operations. The contract was performed in Arizona, indicating a geographic focus for the training activities. The workforce implications include the employment of trainers and support staff by Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the training content and outcomes makes it difficult to assess the direct impact on workforce productivity.
The NAICS code 'Other Computer Related Services' is broad and may not fully capture the scope of training if it was primarily non-technical.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust procurement process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Contract duration of nearly five years allowed for sustained and potentially more effective training program development and delivery.

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector, particularly under NAICS code 541519 ('Other Computer Related Services'), encompasses a wide array of support functions for government agencies. This contract for training support fits within the broader landscape of professional services procured by federal entities to enhance their workforce capabilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific type and duration of training, but federal spending on IT and related support services is consistently in the billions annually.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the awardee, Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC, is not identified as a small business in this context. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award appears limited, though the prime contractor's overall subcontracting practices would be a separate consideration.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) has established oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and financial accountability. As a firm-fixed-price contract, the primary accountability lies with the contractor to deliver the specified training services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often internal. Inspector General oversight would apply if any issues of fraud, waste, or abuse were identified.

Related Government Programs

Federal Workforce Training Programs
IT Professional Services
Government Contractor Training

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics
Ambiguity in service scope due to broad NAICS code

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $12.5 million to ALUTIIQ INTERNATIONAL SOLUTIONS, LLC. TRAINING SUPPORT AND SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ALUTIIQ INTERNATIONAL SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-01-03. End: 2012-09-30.

What specific types of training were delivered under this contract, and what was the target audience?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'TRAINING SUPPORT AND SERVICES' under NAICS code 541519 ('Other Computer Related Services'). However, the specific content of the training (e.g., IT skills, leadership development, compliance training) and the intended recipients (e.g., specific agencies, job roles, or general federal employees) are not detailed. This lack of specificity makes it difficult to assess the relevance and impact of the training. Further analysis would require access to the contract's statement of work (SOW) or performance reports to understand the curriculum, delivery methods, and the intended beneficiaries within the federal workforce.

How does the per-contractor value of approximately $4.17 million annually compare to similar training support contracts?

The annual value of this contract, averaging roughly $4.17 million ($12.5M / ~3 years of active performance, assuming the full duration was utilized), needs context to be benchmarked effectively. Without knowing the scope, duration, and complexity of the training services, a direct comparison is difficult. Contracts for large-scale, multi-year, specialized technical training could easily exceed this figure, while smaller, more localized training efforts would be significantly less. To assess value, this figure should be compared against contracts providing similar training services to comparable numbers of personnel within the federal government or even the private sector, considering factors like instructor rates, material development costs, and administrative overhead.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how did Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC perform against them?

The provided data does not include information on the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) established for this training support contract. Typically, such contracts would outline metrics related to training completion rates, participant satisfaction, knowledge retention, or the application of learned skills. Assessing contractor performance requires access to these KPIs and the corresponding performance evaluations or reports. Without this data, it's impossible to determine if Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC met or exceeded expectations, or if there were any performance issues that impacted the contract's effectiveness or value.

What is the historical spending pattern for training support services by the General Services Administration (GSA) in this category?

The provided data focuses solely on this specific contract (ID: not provided, but implied by the data points). To understand GSA's historical spending patterns for training support services under NAICS 541519, a broader analysis of GSA's procurement history would be necessary. This would involve examining contract awards over several fiscal years, identifying trends in contract types, competition levels, average contract values, and the primary contractors. Such an analysis could reveal whether GSA's reliance on external training support has increased or decreased, and whether spending has been concentrated with specific vendors or spread across a diverse market.

Were there any significant risks identified during the procurement or performance phases of this contract?

The provided data does not contain information regarding specific risks identified during the procurement or performance phases of this contract. Standard risk assessments in federal contracting might consider factors such as contractor financial stability, past performance, technical approach feasibility, and potential for schedule delays or cost overruns. For a firm-fixed-price contract, the primary risk is typically borne by the contractor regarding cost. However, government risks could include inadequate service delivery, contractor default, or failure to meet performance standards. Without access to pre-award assessments or performance monitoring reports, a detailed risk analysis is not possible.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 9T8ZDAIS808

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Afognak Native Corp (UEI: 052089695)

Address: 3909 ARCTIC BLVD. SUITE 400, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,498,328

Exercised Options: $12,498,328

Current Obligation: $12,498,328

Timeline