GSA Awards $28.7M Contract for Seismic Upgrades at Federal Building in Richmond, CA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,668,392 ($28.7M)

Contractor: Stronghold Engineering Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2016-09-13

End Date: 2019-08-30

Contract Duration: 1,081 days

Daily Burn Rate: $26.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: ''IGF::OT::IGF'' THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND INCIDENTALS NEEDED FOR PARTIAL SEISMIC UPGRADE AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED DUE TO IMPACT ON ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES, MEP SYSTEMS AND BUILD-OUT SWING SPACE AT THE FRANK HAGEL FEDERAL BUILDING, 1221 NEVIN AVENUE, RICHMOND, CA.

Place of Performance

Location: RICHMOND, CONTRA COSTA County, CALIFORNIA, 94801

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $28.7 million to STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INC for work described as: ''IGF::OT::IGF'' THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND INCIDENTALS NEEDED FOR PARTIAL SEISMIC UPGRADE AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED DUE TO IMPACT ON ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES, MEP SYSTEMS AND BUILD-OUT SWING SPACE AT THE FRANK HAGEL FEDERAL BUILDING, 12… Key points: 1. The contract focuses on seismic upgrades and related improvements, addressing architectural and MEP systems. 2. Stronghold Engineering Inc. secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. The project duration is 1081 days, indicating a significant undertaking. 4. The firm fixed-price contract type suggests a defined scope and cost control.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $28.7 million for building construction is substantial. Benchmarking against similar seismic upgrade projects would be necessary to fully assess its value, but the scale suggests a complex and extensive scope of work.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for a wide range of contractors to bid. This method is expected to yield a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential infrastructure improvements to a federal building, ensuring its safety and functionality.

Public Impact

Ensures the structural integrity and safety of the Frank Hagel Federal Building. Supports the modernization of federal infrastructure, improving workspace for federal employees. Contributes to the local economy through construction jobs and related services in Richmond, CA.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen structural issues arise during seismic upgrades.
Contract duration is long, increasing exposure to market fluctuations and potential delays.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor efficiency.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Addresses critical safety and infrastructure needs for a federal facility.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on project size, complexity, and location. Federal building upgrades often command higher costs due to stringent requirements.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Stronghold Engineering Inc. and does not indicate any specific subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved in the supply chain or as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for managing federal buildings. Oversight would involve monitoring project progress, adherence to specifications, and budget management to ensure accountability and successful completion.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
General Services Administration Contracting
Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration increases risk of delays and cost escalation.
Potential for unforeseen conditions in seismic retrofitting.
Lack of detailed performance metrics.
Dependence on a single contractor for a critical infrastructure project.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $28.7 million to STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INC. ''IGF::OT::IGF'' THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND INCIDENTALS NEEDED FOR PARTIAL SEISMIC UPGRADE AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED DUE TO IMPACT ON ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES, MEP SYSTEMS AND BUILD-OUT SWING SPACE AT THE FRANK HAGEL FEDERAL BUILDING, 1221 NEVIN AVENUE, RICHMOND, CA.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-09-13. End: 2019-08-30.

What specific seismic risks does the Frank Hagel Federal Building face that necessitate this upgrade?

The data does not specify the exact seismic risks. However, California is a high-risk earthquake zone, and federal buildings are subject to rigorous safety standards. This upgrade likely addresses compliance with current seismic codes and mitigation of potential damage from seismic events to ensure occupant safety and operational continuity.

How does the $28.7 million cost compare to similar seismic upgrade projects in the region?

Without specific data on comparable projects (size, scope, building type, specific seismic retrofitting techniques), a direct cost comparison is difficult. However, seismic upgrades are complex and expensive, involving structural engineering, specialized materials, and significant labor. The cost appears substantial but may be justified given the scale and regulatory requirements for federal facilities in a seismically active area.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract?

The provided data does not detail specific KPIs. Typically, for construction projects, success is measured by adherence to schedule, budget, quality of work (meeting building codes and specifications), and safety compliance. Post-construction assessments of structural integrity and functionality would also be critical indicators.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: GS-09-P-16-KT-C-7002

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2000 MARKET ST, RIVERSIDE, CA, 92501

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,668,392

Exercised Options: $28,668,392

Current Obligation: $28,668,392

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline