GSA Modifies $12.6M Construction Contract for Public Buildings Service in California
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,635,723 ($12.6M)
Contractor: Dick Corporation
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2002-09-03
End Date: 2010-06-30
Contract Duration: 2,857 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS FOR THE FOLLOWING SCOPE OF WORK: COR'S 51, 92, 99, 108, 114, 118 AND 119
Place of Performance
Location: FRESNO, FRESNO County, CALIFORNIA, 93721
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $12.6 million to DICK CORPORATION for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS FOR THE FOLLOWING SCOPE OF WORK: COR'S 51, 92, 99, 108, 114, 118 AND 119 Key points: 1. Contract modifications indicate potential scope creep or evolving project needs. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market. 3. The long duration (2002-2010) and multiple modifications warrant scrutiny for cost control. 4. Construction sector spending can be volatile; benchmarks are crucial for value assessment.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $12.6M over 8 years with 6 modifications suggests a substantial project. Without specific details on the modifications' scope and cost, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the number of modifications could indicate potential cost overruns or scope creep.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Awarded under full and open competition, this method typically fosters competitive pricing. However, the subsequent modifications and long contract duration may have impacted price discovery over time, potentially leading to less competitive pricing on change orders.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers. However, the cumulative cost of modifications over the contract's lifespan needs careful monitoring to ensure continued value for taxpayer money.
Public Impact
Public infrastructure projects impact communities and the economy. Long-term contracts require ongoing oversight to ensure efficient use of funds. Modifications can lead to increased costs if not managed effectively.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Multiple contract modifications over a long period.
- Lack of detail on modification scope.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Contract awarded by GSA, a major federal agency.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector (NAICS 236220). Federal construction spending benchmarks vary significantly by project type and location. The $12.6M value over 8 years suggests a moderately sized, long-term project.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a factor in this contract award or its modifications. This suggests that larger firms were the primary contractors, potentially limiting opportunities for small businesses in this specific project.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. The presence of multiple modifications (no: 6) over an extended period (dur: 2857 days) necessitates robust oversight to ensure adherence to original scope, cost controls, and taxpayer value.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- General Services Administration Contracting
- Public Buildings Service Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep due to multiple modifications.
- Long contract duration may obscure initial pricing competitiveness.
- Lack of small business participation.
- Insufficient detail on modification specifics.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, general-services-administration, ca, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $12.6 million to DICK CORPORATION. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS FOR THE FOLLOWING SCOPE OF WORK: COR'S 51, 92, 99, 108, 114, 118 AND 119
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DICK CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-09-03. End: 2010-06-30.
What was the specific scope and cost impact of each of the six contract modifications?
Understanding the details of each modification is crucial for assessing whether the contract remained within its original intent and budget. Significant deviations or cost increases without clear justification would raise concerns about value and oversight effectiveness. This information is vital for a comprehensive analysis of the contract's financial performance and adherence to procurement regulations.
Were there any cost savings or efficiencies realized through the contract's long duration and multiple modifications?
While multiple modifications can sometimes indicate scope creep or cost overruns, they can also reflect adaptive project management in response to changing needs or unforeseen circumstances. Analyzing whether these changes led to improved project outcomes, cost efficiencies, or were simply reactive adjustments is key to evaluating the contract's overall effectiveness and value for taxpayer money.
What is the benchmark cost for similar federal building construction projects of this size and duration in California?
Establishing a benchmark cost for comparable federal building construction projects in California is essential for evaluating the $12.6M contract's value. Without this context, it's difficult to determine if the awarded price was competitive and reasonable. Benchmarking helps identify potential overspending or cost savings, ensuring taxpayer funds are used efficiently and effectively.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: DCK Worldwide, LLC (UEI: 826879426)
Address: 1900 STATE ROUTE 51, LARGE, PA, 12
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $12,668,353
Exercised Options: $12,635,723
Current Obligation: $12,635,723
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-09-03
Current End Date: 2010-06-30
Potential End Date: 2010-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-02-09
More Contracts from Dick Corporation
- Federal Contract — $119.6M (General Services Administration)
- 200508!009305!1700!n62467!navy Facilities Engineering Comm!n6246705c0099 !A!N! !N! ! !20050526!20070527!037937786!037937786!037937786!n!dick Corporation !1900 State RTE 51 !clairton !pa!15025!47970!033!12!naval Station !escambia !florida !+000079017192!n!n!000079017192!y199!other Miscellaneous Buildings !C2 !construction !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!002!b! !D!N!C! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!y! !N! ! !1700!N00204!0001! ! — $81.8M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $73.7M (General Services Administration)
- Design Review — $36.2M (General Services Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)