GSA Awards $88M Design/Build Contract for Mickey Leland Federal Building Renovations in Texas
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $88,169,712 ($88.2M)
Contractor: Gilbane Building Company
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2010-03-22
End Date: 2015-06-15
Contract Duration: 1,911 days
Daily Burn Rate: $46.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: DESIGN/BUILD RENOVATIONS AT THE GT "MICKEY" LELAND FEDERAL BUILDING IN HOUSTON, TEXAS. RENOVATIONS INCLUDE REPLACEMENT OF THE EXTERIOR BUILDING ENVELOPE, HVAC UPGRADES, LIGHTING CONTROLS TO MAXIMIZE ENERGY EFFICIENCY, ETC.
Place of Performance
Location: HOUSTON, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77010
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $88.2 million to GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY for work described as: DESIGN/BUILD RENOVATIONS AT THE GT "MICKEY" LELAND FEDERAL BUILDING IN HOUSTON, TEXAS. RENOVATIONS INCLUDE REPLACEMENT OF THE EXTERIOR BUILDING ENVELOPE, HVAC UPGRADES, LIGHTING CONTROLS TO MAXIMIZE ENERGY EFFICIENCY, ETC. Key points: 1. Significant investment in federal building infrastructure, focusing on energy efficiency. 2. Gilbane Building Company secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. Project duration of 1911 days indicates a substantial scope of work. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, providing cost certainty.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The award amount of $88.17 million for a comprehensive design/build renovation of a federal building appears reasonable given the scope, which includes exterior envelope, HVAC, and lighting upgrades. Benchmarking against similar large-scale federal building renovations would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust process for soliciting bids and ensuring fair pricing. This method typically leads to competitive pricing as multiple contractors vie for the award.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential infrastructure upgrades aimed at improving energy efficiency and extending the life of a federal facility, potentially leading to long-term operational cost savings.
Public Impact
Modernization of a key federal facility in Houston, Texas. Potential for improved energy efficiency and reduced operational costs for the building. Creation of construction jobs during the renovation period. Enhanced functionality and safety of the Mickey Leland Federal Building.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to the long duration and complexity of renovations.
- Risk of delays impacting building operations or tenant services.
Positive Signals
- Focus on energy efficiency aligns with government sustainability goals.
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides budget predictability.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive award.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Federal building renovations of this scale, particularly those incorporating significant energy efficiency upgrades, are common but require substantial investment. Benchmarks vary widely based on building size, age, and specific upgrade requirements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the prime contractor is Gilbane Building Company, a large firm. There is no explicit information on small business participation in this award, which warrants further investigation to ensure opportunities were provided.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service, is responsible for overseeing this project. Oversight would focus on ensuring the renovations meet design specifications, are completed on time, and within budget, with accountability for project success.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- General Services Administration Contracting
- Public Buildings Service Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of explicit small business participation data.
- Potential for scope creep in a large, multi-year renovation.
- Dependency on contractor performance over an extended period.
- Complexity of integrating new systems with existing building infrastructure.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, general-services-administration, tx, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $88.2 million to GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY. DESIGN/BUILD RENOVATIONS AT THE GT "MICKEY" LELAND FEDERAL BUILDING IN HOUSTON, TEXAS. RENOVATIONS INCLUDE REPLACEMENT OF THE EXTERIOR BUILDING ENVELOPE, HVAC UPGRADES, LIGHTING CONTROLS TO MAXIMIZE ENERGY EFFICIENCY, ETC.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $88.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-03-22. End: 2015-06-15.
What specific energy savings are projected from the HVAC and lighting upgrades, and how do these compare to industry standards for similar renovations?
The projected energy savings are crucial for justifying the investment. A detailed analysis comparing the anticipated savings from the HVAC and lighting upgrades against established benchmarks for similar federal building renovations would determine the true long-term value. This comparison should consider factors like building size, climate zone, and the specific technologies implemented to ensure the efficiency goals are met and taxpayer money is well-spent.
What mechanisms are in place to mitigate risks associated with a long-duration (1911 days) design/build renovation project, such as unforeseen site conditions or material cost fluctuations?
Mitigation strategies for long-duration projects typically include robust contingency planning, detailed site investigations prior to final design, and contract clauses addressing potential cost escalations or delays. The GSA likely employs phased construction schedules, regular progress reviews, and potentially escalation clauses tied to specific indices to manage risks. Clear communication protocols and a dedicated project management team are also vital for addressing issues proactively.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value was achieved for the government, considering the complexity of a design/build contract?
Full and open competition is designed to foster a competitive environment, driving down costs and encouraging innovation. For a complex design/build project, the effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the solicitation requirements, the evaluation criteria used, and the responsiveness of the market. A thorough review of the proposals received and the justification for the selected bid would confirm whether this process yielded optimal value and met the government's specific needs for the Leland Federal Building renovation.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: GS07P09UYC0008
Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Gilbane, Inc.
Address: 1331 LAMAR ST STE 1170, HOUSTON, TX, 77010
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $88,169,712
Exercised Options: $88,169,712
Current Obligation: $88,169,712
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-03-22
Current End Date: 2015-06-15
Potential End Date: 2015-06-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-01
More Contracts from Gilbane Building Company
- Arra::yes::arra TAS::75 0839::TAS -- Recovery ACT -- Cmc@risk Services to Renovate of Building 10 Wings E and F — $139.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Construct National Biodefense Analysis & Countermeasures Center (nbacc) — $127.1M (Department of Homeland Security)
- TAS::75 0849::TAS Bldgs&fac / Admin&svc Bldgs — $109.2M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- P1997210, Office Bldg 106 & Parking Deck, Chamblee Campus — $109.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Construction — $107.7M (Department of Health and Human Services)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)