GSA's $46.7M Edward Zorinsky Federal Building Renovation Awarded to Caddell Construction Co., Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $46,714,764 ($46.7M)

Contractor: Caddell Construction CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2004-07-08

End Date: 2006-01-02

Contract Duration: 543 days

Daily Burn Rate: $86.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: EDWARD ZORINSKY FEDERAL BUILDING RENOVATION 1600 CAPITOL AVENUE, OMAHA, NE AWARDED TO CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. (GS06P02GZC0546)

Place of Performance

Location: OMAHA, DOUGLAS County, NEBRASKA, 68102

State: Nebraska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $46.7 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. for work described as: EDWARD ZORINSKY FEDERAL BUILDING RENOVATION 1600 CAPITOL AVENUE, OMAHA, NE AWARDED TO CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. (GS06P02GZC0546) Key points: 1. The contract was awarded using full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type indicates that the contractor assumes the risk for cost overruns. 3. The duration of 543 days suggests a significant renovation project. 4. The award was made by the General Services Administration (GSA), a major federal agency. 5. The project is located in Omaha, Nebraska, impacting the local economy and workforce. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags warrants further investigation into subcontracting opportunities.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific renovation against comparable federal building projects is challenging without more detailed scope information. However, the award amount of approximately $46.7 million for a federal building renovation of this scale (indicated by the 543-day duration) appears within a reasonable range for major construction projects. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor, which can be beneficial for the government if managed effectively. Further analysis would require comparing the cost per square foot or per unit of work against similar GSA projects.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 4 bids (no: 4) suggests a moderate level of competition for this project. While not an exceptionally high number of bidders, it demonstrates that multiple firms were interested and capable of undertaking the renovation. This level of competition generally provides a reasonable basis for price discovery and can help ensure the government receives a fair price.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. The 'full and open' nature of this award suggests that the government explored a broad range of potential contractors, increasing the likelihood of securing a competitive price.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are federal agencies that will occupy the renovated Edward Zorinsky Federal Building, leading to improved workspace and operational efficiency. The project delivers essential renovation and modernization services to a significant federal facility. The geographic impact is concentrated in Omaha, Nebraska, potentially creating local construction jobs and stimulating the regional economy. The renovation will likely involve a substantial construction workforce, including skilled tradespeople and project management personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of explicit small business subcontracting goals may limit opportunities for smaller firms in the construction ecosystem.
The fixed-price contract, while shifting risk, could lead to change orders if the scope is not perfectly defined, potentially increasing costs.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad search for qualified contractors.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, assuming effective scope management.
The project addresses the modernization of a federal building, ensuring its continued utility and safety.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction and Facilities Management sector, specifically focusing on the renovation and modernization of federal government buildings. The General Services Administration (GSA) is a primary entity responsible for managing and maintaining federal real estate. The market for federal building construction and renovation is substantial, with significant annual spending by agencies like GSA. This contract represents a portion of that broader spending aimed at ensuring the functionality and longevity of government infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (sb: false). While there were 4 bids received, it is unclear from the provided data whether any of these were small businesses or if there were specific subcontracting plans targeting small businesses. Without explicit set-aside provisions or reported subcontracting goals, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is uncertain, though larger prime contractors often engage small businesses for specialized services.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its construction projects, including project management teams, quality assurance inspections, and contract close-out procedures. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor bears the primary responsibility for cost control. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and public reporting. The Inspector General's office within GSA would have jurisdiction over any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Renovations
GSA Construction Contracts
Public Infrastructure Projects
Edward Zorinsky Federal Building Operations

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep in large renovation projects.
Contractor performance risk, though mitigated by fixed-price contract.
Uncertainty regarding small business subcontracting opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $46.7 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. EDWARD ZORINSKY FEDERAL BUILDING RENOVATION 1600 CAPITOL AVENUE, OMAHA, NE AWARDED TO CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. (GS06P02GZC0546)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $46.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-07-08. End: 2006-01-02.

What was the specific scope of work for the Edward Zorinsky Federal Building renovation, and how did it compare to the initial project requirements?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for the Edward Zorinsky Federal Building renovation. However, the award amount of $46.7 million and a contract duration of 543 days (approximately 1.5 years) suggest a substantial project. Typical federal building renovations can include upgrades to HVAC systems, electrical and plumbing infrastructure, interior finishes, accessibility improvements (ADA compliance), structural repairs, and potentially energy efficiency enhancements. Without the original Statement of Work (SOW) and any subsequent modifications or change orders, a direct comparison to initial requirements is not possible. Understanding the scope is crucial for evaluating the value and assessing potential cost deviations.

How did Caddell Construction Co., Inc.'s pricing compare to other bidders, and what does this suggest about their competitiveness?

The data indicates that Caddell Construction Co., Inc. was awarded the contract, and there were 4 total bids received. However, the specific pricing of each bid is not provided. Therefore, we cannot directly compare Caddell's pricing to that of the other bidders. The fact that they won suggests their bid was deemed the most advantageous to the government, which could be based on a combination of price, technical qualifications, past performance, and other evaluation factors outlined in the solicitation. Without the detailed bid tabulation, it's impossible to definitively state how competitive their pricing was relative to others.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used by GSA to monitor the progress and quality of this renovation project?

While specific KPIs for this particular contract are not detailed in the provided data, federal construction projects managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) typically employ a range of performance monitoring mechanisms. These often include adherence to project schedules, quality control inspections, compliance with building codes and safety regulations, budget management, and timely resolution of any issues or deficiencies. GSA project managers and contracting officers would be responsible for overseeing these aspects, often supported by construction quality assurance representatives. Performance would be formally assessed throughout the project lifecycle and upon completion.

What is the historical spending pattern for renovations at the Edward Zorinsky Federal Building or similar GSA-managed facilities in Nebraska?

The provided data focuses solely on this specific $46.7 million award to Caddell Construction Co., Inc. for the Edward Zorinsky Federal Building renovation. It does not offer historical spending data for this building or for similar GSA-managed facilities within Nebraska. To analyze historical spending patterns, one would need to access contract databases (like FPDS or USASpending) and filter for previous contracts awarded to this specific building, or for renovation projects managed by GSA's Public Buildings Service in the state of Nebraska. This would allow for an assessment of the frequency, scale, and cost trends of past renovation efforts.

Are there any known risks or challenges associated with Caddell Construction Co., Inc. based on their past performance on federal contracts?

The provided data does not include information on Caddell Construction Co., Inc.'s past performance or any associated risks or challenges on federal contracts. A comprehensive risk assessment would require reviewing their performance history, including any past issues with contract delivery, quality, cost overruns, or disputes. This information is typically available through sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Without access to CPARS or similar performance evaluation databases, it is not possible to identify specific risks related to this contractor's track record.

How does the $46.7 million award compare to the average cost of similar federal building renovation projects managed by GSA?

Comparing the $46.7 million award for the Edward Zorinsky Federal Building renovation to average costs requires context regarding the size, scope, and complexity of the project. Federal building renovations can vary significantly. A $46.7 million project is substantial, likely involving major systems upgrades and extensive interior work. Average costs can be difficult to pinpoint without defining parameters like square footage, building age, type of renovation (e.g., gut renovation vs. targeted upgrades), and geographic location (which impacts labor and material costs). Generally, large-scale federal building modernizations can run into tens of millions of dollars. To provide a precise benchmark, we would need data on comparable projects, ideally normalized by factors like cost per square foot or cost per functional unit.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 2700 LAGOON PARK DRIVE, MONTGOMERY, AL, 02

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $46,714,764

Exercised Options: $46,714,764

Current Obligation: $46,714,764

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Timeline