GSA Awards $327M Thurgood Marshall Courthouse Construction Contract to Cauldwell-Wingate

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $327,184,867 ($327.2M)

Contractor: Cauldwell-Wingate Company, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2007-01-17

End Date: 2018-12-31

Contract Duration: 4,366 days

Daily Burn Rate: $74.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CMC SERVICES FOR THE THURGOOD MARSHALL U.S. COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT 40 CENTRE STREET, NEW YORK, NY

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10007

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $327.2 million to CAULDWELL-WINGATE COMPANY, LLC for work described as: CMC SERVICES FOR THE THURGOOD MARSHALL U.S. COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT 40 CENTRE STREET, NEW YORK, NY Key points: 1. The contract value of $327.2 million represents a significant investment in federal infrastructure. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The project carries risks associated with large-scale construction and long durations. 4. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a vital area for public facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $327.2 million for construction services at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale federal courthouse construction projects would be necessary for a precise value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating multiple bidders participated. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for the construction and maintenance of a critical federal courthouse, ensuring its operational integrity and public service capacity.

Public Impact

Ensures the continued operation and modernization of a key federal judicial facility. Supports economic activity through construction jobs and material procurement in New York. Impacts the efficiency and security of the judicial process within the courthouse.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 75 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, which is crucial for maintaining and upgrading federal facilities. Spending benchmarks for similar courthouse construction projects would provide further context.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not directly involved in this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Future contracts should explore opportunities for small business participation to foster economic diversity.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Robust oversight is crucial given the contract's value and duration to ensure adherence to scope, budget, and quality standards.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, general-services-administration, ny, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $327.2 million to CAULDWELL-WINGATE COMPANY, LLC. CMC SERVICES FOR THE THURGOOD MARSHALL U.S. COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT 40 CENTRE STREET, NEW YORK, NY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CAULDWELL-WINGATE COMPANY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $327.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-01-17. End: 2018-12-31.

What was the initial estimated cost versus the final award amount, and how did the competitive bidding process influence this?

The provided data does not include the initial estimated cost. However, the final award amount of $327.2 million resulted from a full and open competition. This competitive process is designed to drive down costs, suggesting the final award reflects market-driven pricing rather than a sole-source negotiation.

What are the primary risks associated with a construction project of this magnitude and duration, and what mitigation strategies were employed?

Major risks include potential cost overruns due to inflation, unforeseen site conditions, and changes in building codes over the 12-year duration. Mitigation strategies likely involved detailed initial planning, contingency funds, and strict change order management processes, though specific details are not provided.

How does the cost per square foot or per unit of this project compare to similar federal courthouse construction projects to assess its effectiveness?

Without specific details on the square footage or the exact scope of work beyond 'CMC Services,' a direct per-unit cost comparison is not feasible. Benchmarking would require detailed project specifications and cost breakdowns from comparable federal courthouse construction projects.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: GS-02P-05-DTC-0021

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 122 E 42ND ST RM 205, NEW YORK, NY, 10168

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $327,184,867

Exercised Options: $327,184,867

Current Obligation: $327,184,867

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-01-17

Current End Date: 2018-12-31

Potential End Date: 2018-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-03-21

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending