Springfield Courthouse Construction: $58.6M Awarded to Daniel O'Connell's Sons Inc. via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $58,624,462 ($58.6M)
Contractor: Daniel Oconnells Sons Inc
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2004-02-09
End Date: 2008-09-29
Contract Duration: 1,694 days
Daily Burn Rate: $34.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE NEW SPRINGFIELD COURTHOUSE, SPRINGFIELD, MA PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
Place of Performance
Location: SPRINGFIELD, HAMPDEN County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01105
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $58.6 million to DANIEL OCONNELLS SONS INC for work described as: FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE NEW SPRINGFIELD COURTHOUSE, SPRINGFIELD, MA PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. Key points: 1. The project involved the construction of a new courthouse in Springfield, MA. 2. Awarded to Daniel O'Connell's Sons Inc. under a firm-fixed-price contract. 3. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The project duration was 1694 days, indicating a significant construction timeline.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $58.6 million for commercial and institutional building construction is substantial. Benchmarking against similar courthouse projects would be necessary to fully assess value, but the firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and allows for a wide range of potential bidders. This method is generally expected to yield fair market prices.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.
Public Impact
Construction of a new public facility, the Springfield Courthouse, will enhance local government services. The project created jobs during its construction phase. The new courthouse will serve the legal and judicial needs of Springfield and surrounding areas. The firm-fixed-price contract limits the government's exposure to cost overruns. The project's completion impacts the local construction industry and economy.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific cost breakdowns for the $58.6M award.
- No clear indication of small business participation.
- The 'br' value of 34607 is unexplained and could represent a significant cost factor or benchmark.
Positive Signals
- Awarded via full and open competition.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
- Project addresses a public need for judicial infrastructure.
Sector Analysis
This project falls under commercial and institutional building construction, a sector that can be subject to significant cost fluctuations based on material prices, labor availability, and project complexity. Benchmarks for similar courthouse constructions would be relevant.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor ('sb': false). This suggests that the prime contractor is likely a larger entity, and opportunities for small businesses may have been limited to subcontracting roles not detailed here.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA), through its Public Buildings Service, is responsible for overseeing federal building construction. The use of full and open competition is a standard oversight mechanism to ensure fair pricing and contractor selection.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- General Services Administration Contracting
- Public Buildings Service Programs
Risk Flags
- Unexplained 'br' value.
- No small business participation noted.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown.
- Potential for cost escalation in construction sector.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, general-services-administration, ma, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $58.6 million to DANIEL OCONNELLS SONS INC. FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE NEW SPRINGFIELD COURTHOUSE, SPRINGFIELD, MA PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DANIEL OCONNELLS SONS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $58.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-02-09. End: 2008-09-29.
What is the benchmark cost per square foot for similar courthouse construction projects in Massachusetts during the 2004-2008 period?
Without specific project details like square footage, a precise benchmark is impossible. However, general construction cost indices for commercial buildings in Massachusetts during that period can provide a rough estimate. Factors like specialized security features, court-specific infrastructure, and high-quality finishes typical of courthouses would likely place it above standard commercial building costs.
What risks were identified during the feasibility study that led to the $58.6 million budget?
The provided data does not detail specific risks identified during the feasibility study. Typically, risks in such projects include unforeseen site conditions, material cost escalations, labor shortages, design changes, and permitting delays. The firm-fixed-price contract suggests these risks were either mitigated or transferred to the contractor.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for taxpayers?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bids and driving down prices. While the process itself is a strong indicator of value-seeking, the ultimate effectiveness depends on the quality of the bids received, the evaluation criteria used, and the final negotiated price relative to the project's scope and quality requirements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Sealand Enviro LLC (UEI: 097445399)
Address: 480 HAMPDEN ST, HOLYOKE, MA, 01
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $58,624,534
Exercised Options: $58,624,534
Current Obligation: $58,624,462
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-02-09
Current End Date: 2008-09-29
Potential End Date: 2009-05-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-12-16
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)