DoD Awards $10.19M for Facilities Support Services to Chugach McKinley, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,188,743 ($10.2M)
Contractor: Chugach Mckinley, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-09-08
End Date: 2009-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,483 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200612!601364!1700!N62470!NAV FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMA!N6247004D2417 !A!N! !N!FB00 !14 !20050908!20050630!038522876!038522876!071844021!N!CHUGACH MCKINLEY INC !560 E 34TH AVE !ANCHORAGE !AK!99503!09900!133!37!CAMP LEJEUNE !ONSLOW !N CAROLINA!-000002197053!N!N!000000000000!S216!FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !561210!E! !5!B!S!H! !D!20050930!B! ! !N!Z!D!U!J!1!001!N!3A!C!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!E! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y!1727!M67001!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: CAMP LEJEUNE, ONSLOW County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28547
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.2 million to CHUGACH MCKINLEY, INC. for work described as: 200612!601364!1700!N62470!NAV FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMA!N6247004D2417 !A!N! !N!FB00 !14 !20050908!20050630!038522876!038522876!071844021!N!CHUGACH MCKINLEY INC !560 E 34TH AVE !ANCHORAGE !AK!99503!09900!133!37!CAMP LEJEUNE !ONSL… Key points: 1. The contract is for facilities operations support services at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. 2. Awarded to Chugach McKinley, Inc., this represents a significant investment in base maintenance and operations. 3. The contract was not competed, raising questions about potential cost efficiencies and market competitiveness. 4. The sector is Facilities Support Services, a critical component of government infrastructure management.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount is $10,188,743.26 over a period of approximately 4 years. Without specific unit cost data or benchmarks for similar facilities support contracts, a precise per-unit cost assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was awarded using a sole-source justification (Award Without Full and Open Competition). This method limits price discovery and may not result in the most competitive pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this award means taxpayers may not have benefited from competitive bidding, potentially leading to higher costs than if multiple vendors had competed.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operation and maintenance of critical facilities at a major military installation. Supports military readiness by providing essential base support services. Potential for job creation in the Onslow County, North Carolina area through contractor employment.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for inflated pricing due to sole-source award
- Limited transparency on cost-effectiveness
Positive Signals
- Ensures continuity of essential services
- Supports military operations at Camp Lejeune
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) encompass a broad range of services for maintaining and operating buildings and infrastructure. Government spending in this sector is substantial, driven by the need to maintain extensive real estate portfolios.
Small Business Impact
The awardee, Chugach McKinley, Inc., is a large business. There is no indication in the provided data that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this specific award.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was made without full and open competition, suggesting that oversight mechanisms for ensuring fair pricing and performance may have been less rigorous than in a competitive procurement. Further review of the sole-source justification is warranted.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pricing.
- Potential for cost overruns without competitive pressure.
- Lack of transparency on specific service delivery metrics.
- Need for detailed review of sole-source justification.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, nc, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.2 million to CHUGACH MCKINLEY, INC.. 200612!601364!1700!N62470!NAV FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMA!N6247004D2417 !A!N! !N!FB00 !14 !20050908!20050630!038522876!038522876!071844021!N!CHUGACH MCKINLEY INC !560 E 34TH AVE !ANCHORAGE !AK!99503!09900!133!37!CAMP LEJEUNE !ONSLOW !N CAROLINA!-000002197053!N!N!000000000000!S216!FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !561210!E! !5!B!S!H! !D!200
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHUGACH MCKINLEY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-09-08. End: 2009-09-30.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The provided data indicates the contract was awarded under 'Award Without Full and Open Competition' (AW). A detailed review of the specific justification document (e.g., Justification and Approval - J&A) would be necessary to understand the rationale, such as unique capabilities, urgent need, or lack of market research indicating other sources.
How does the awarded price compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities support services?
Without specific details on the scope of services, labor mix, and geographic location, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the absence of competition typically leads to higher prices. Benchmarking would require detailed service line items and comparison with other government or commercial contracts for similar scope and scale.
What performance metrics are in place to ensure the effectiveness of these facilities support services?
The data does not specify performance metrics or quality assurance surveillance plans (QASP). Effective oversight would require clearly defined performance standards, regular monitoring, and mechanisms for addressing deficiencies to ensure the services meet the government's needs and taxpayer expectations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chugach Alaska Corporation (UEI: 071844021)
Address: 560 EAST 34TH AVENUE, ANCHORAGE, AK, 00
Business Categories: Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6247004D2417
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-09-08
Current End Date: 2009-09-30
Potential End Date: 2009-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-03-13
More Contracts from Chugach Mckinley, Inc.
- Federal Contract — $228.0M (Department of Defense)
- 200401!041002!1700!BW10C !naval Surface Warfare Center, Da!n0017804c2072 !A!N! !Y! ! !20031001!20080930!038522876!038522876!071844021!n!chugach Mckinley, Inc !560 East 34TH Avenue !anchorage !ak!99503!21008!099!51!dahlgren !king George !virginia !+000000416000!n!n!000008334538!d301!adp Facility Operation & Maintenance Services !S1 !services !000 !* !541513!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!b!f!n!n!z!b!n!u!1!001!n!5a!z!y!z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !D!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! !N00178!0001! ! — $79.5M (Department of Defense)
- Provide Vocational and Academic Services to Youth Ages 16 to 24 OLD — $52.2M (Department of Labor)
- Federal Contract — $43.0M (Department of Defense)
- Construct Gateway Center — $32.2M (Department of Health and Human Services)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)