DoD's $27.2M IGF Critical Functions Contract Awarded to OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,197,163 ($27.2M)
Contractor: Oasis Systems, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2013-04-18
End Date: 2016-01-17
Contract Duration: 1,004 days
Daily Burn Rate: $27.1K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF CRITICAL FUNCTIONS - PASS INTERIM CONTRACT
Place of Performance
Location: BURLINGTON, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01803
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $27.2 million to OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF CRITICAL FUNCTIONS - PASS INTERIM CONTRACT Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $27.2 million, was awarded to OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC. 2. The contract falls under Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. 3. The award method was 'NOT COMPETED', raising potential concerns about price discovery. 4. The contract duration was 1004 days, ending in January 2016.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the pricing was optimal.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for the government compared to a competitive process.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for a $27.2 million contract may have resulted in taxpayers paying more than necessary.
Public Impact
Research and Development spending can be crucial for national security, but requires careful oversight. The 'NOT COMPETED' status warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and prevent potential waste. The long duration of the contract suggests a sustained need for these critical functions.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost-plus contract type
- No small business participation indicated
Positive Signals
- Awarded for critical functions
- Supports Department of the Air Force
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Research and Development sector, specifically NAICS code 541712. Spending in this sector is vital for innovation but requires robust oversight to ensure value for money.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. This represents a missed opportunity for small business engagement.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT COMPETED' award status suggests a potential gap in oversight regarding competitive sourcing. Further review would be needed to understand the justification for this approach.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for cost overruns with CPFF
- No small business participation
- Limited transparency on justification for sole-source award
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, ma, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $27.2 million to OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC. IGF::CT::IGF CRITICAL FUNCTIONS - PASS INTERIM CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2013-04-18. End: 2016-01-17.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?
The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. A thorough review would be necessary to ascertain the specific justification for this sole-source award. Agencies typically sole-source when only one responsible source can satisfy agency requirements, or in cases of urgent and compelling need. Without further documentation, it's impossible to confirm if alternative competitive strategies were explored or deemed unsuitable.
How was the fixed fee determined in this Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract to ensure it represented fair value?
In a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, the fixed fee is negotiated at the outset and represents the contractor's profit. Determining this fee involves evaluating the complexity of the work, the contractor's technical capabilities, and market rates. Without the contract's negotiation details, it's difficult to assess the fairness of the fee. However, the lack of competition makes it harder to benchmark this fee against market alternatives.
What were the specific 'Critical Functions' supported by this contract, and what is the ongoing need for them?
The contract title mentions 'IGF CRITICAL FUNCTIONS'. 'IGF' likely refers to a specific program or system within the Department of Defense. The critical functions would pertain to essential operational capabilities or support services deemed vital for the Air Force's mission. Understanding the nature of these functions and their continued relevance is key to assessing the long-term value and necessity of the spending.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 24 HARTWELL AVE, LEXINGTON, MA, 02421
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $33,861,591
Exercised Options: $33,818,239
Current Obligation: $27,197,163
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2013-04-18
Current End Date: 2016-01-17
Potential End Date: 2016-01-17 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-22
More Contracts from Oasis Systems, LLC
- Technical Management & Advisory Services (tmas 2) 96TH CTG — $349.0M (Department of Defense)
- ,Ct::igf Procurement of Engineering, Professional, and Adminisntrative Support Services (epas — $242.0M (Department of Defense)
- Advisory and Assistance Services (A&AS) — $233.5M (Department of Defense)
- Scat 1 Engineering Professional and Administrative Support Services (epass) for AIR Force Life Cycle Management Center Fighters and Advanced Aircraft Directorate F15 Division (aflcmc/Waq) — $223.7M (Department of Defense)
- FOR Acquisition of Engineering, Professional & Administrative Support Services (epass) in Support of HB Directorate — $182.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)