DoD awards $1B+ MIT contract for unspecified professional services, raising oversight questions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,009,861,024 ($1.0B)

Contractor: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-12-06

End Date: 2012-08-06

Contract Duration: 244 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.1M/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MIT LL CONTINUATION CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: LEXINGTON, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02421

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $1.01 billion to MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for work described as: MIT LL CONTINUATION CONTRACT Key points: 1. Significant award value of over $1 billion. 2. Contract awarded to a single entity, MIT, with no competition. 3. Lack of competition and unclear service scope present potential risks. 4. Services fall under 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services'.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value is exceptionally high for 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services'. Without detailed service descriptions or benchmarks, assessing pricing reasonableness is difficult. The 'COST NO FEE' contract type suggests costs are reimbursed, but the fee structure is absent.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was sole-sourced, meaning no competition was sought. This significantly limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers. The justification for a sole-source award is not provided.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this large award means taxpayers may not have received the best possible price due to the absence of competitive bidding.

Public Impact

Taxpayers are funding a substantial contract without competitive bidding. The broad service category makes it difficult for the public to understand the specific work performed. Lack of transparency in sole-source awards can erode public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' category (NAICS 541990) is broad and can encompass diverse activities. Spending benchmarks are difficult to establish due to this lack of specificity. The award to MIT suggests a focus on research or specialized technical expertise.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded directly to MIT and does not indicate any subcontracting or participation by small businesses. The sole-source nature likely precluded small business set-asides.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this large contract warrants close oversight to ensure the services provided are necessary and that costs are reasonable. The lack of competition makes independent verification of value challenging.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

all-other-professional-scientific-and-te, department-of-defense, ma, definitive-contract, billion-dollar

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $1.01 billion to MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. MIT LL CONTINUATION CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.01 billion.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-12-06. End: 2012-08-06.

What specific services were procured under this $1B+ contract, and how do they align with the Air Force's mission?

The contract falls under NAICS code 541990, 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services,' which is extremely broad. Without a detailed statement of work or justification for the sole-source award, it is impossible to determine the specific services procured. This lack of clarity makes it difficult to assess the necessity and alignment of these services with the Department of the Air Force's strategic objectives.

What is the justification for awarding over $1 billion to MIT on a sole-source basis without competition?

The provided data does not include the justification for this sole-source award. Typically, sole-source contracts are awarded when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. For a contract of this magnitude and broad service category, a robust justification, likely involving unique capabilities or critical national security needs, would be expected but is absent here.

How can the effectiveness and value for money of this contract be assessed given its sole-source nature and broad service description?

Assessing effectiveness and value for money is significantly hampered by the sole-source award and the vague service description. Without competitive bids to establish a market price, and without knowing the specific deliverables, it's challenging to benchmark performance or cost. Post-award reviews and detailed audits would be crucial for any meaningful evaluation of the contract's success.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesOther Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesAll Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 244 WOOD ST, LEXINGTON, MA, 02421

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,009,861,024

Exercised Options: $1,009,861,024

Current Obligation: $1,009,861,024

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-12-06

Current End Date: 2012-08-06

Potential End Date: 2012-08-06 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-10-29

More Contracts from Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View all Massachusetts Institute of Technology federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending