Air Force awards $415M contract to MITRE for National Security Engineering Services, raising competition concerns
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $414,866,328 ($414.9M)
Contractor: THE Mitre Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2021-10-01
End Date: 2023-09-30
Contract Duration: 729 days
Daily Burn Rate: $569.1K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: MITRE NATIONAL SECURITY ENGINEERING CENTER (NSEC) SERVICES FOR THE AIR FORCE
Place of Performance
Location: BEDFORD, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01730
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $414.9 million to THE MITRE CORPORATION for work described as: MITRE NATIONAL SECURITY ENGINEERING CENTER (NSEC) SERVICES FOR THE AIR FORCE Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting potential cost savings from competition. 2. Significant funding allocated for specialized engineering and technical services. 3. MITRE's established role in government R&D suggests deep institutional knowledge. 4. Contract duration of 729 days indicates a substantial, ongoing need. 5. Lack of small business set-aside suggests focus on large, specialized capabilities. 6. Performance-based contract type (Cost No Fee) shifts risk to the government. 7. Geographic location in Massachusetts may indicate specific regional expertise or facilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $414.9 million over two years is substantial. Benchmarking value is difficult without comparable sole-source contracts for similar specialized services. The Cost No Fee (CNF) contract type, while common for R&D, places the financial risk on the government, potentially leading to higher overall costs if not managed effectively. The absence of a fixed price or incentive structure means the government pays actual costs incurred, plus a negotiated fee, making direct value-for-money assessment challenging without detailed cost breakdowns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis to The MITRE Corporation. This indicates that the Air Force determined that only MITRE possessed the unique capabilities or was the only responsible source for the required National Security Engineering Center (NSEC) services. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from price discovery through a bidding process, potentially leading to higher costs than if multiple vendors had competed.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. Without competing offers, there is less assurance that the negotiated price reflects the lowest possible cost for the services rendered.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Air Force, receiving critical engineering and technical support for national security initiatives. Services delivered likely encompass advanced research, development, systems engineering, and technical advisory support for complex defense programs. Geographic impact is concentrated in Massachusetts, where MITRE's NSEC is located, potentially supporting the local high-tech ecosystem. Workforce implications include the employment of highly skilled scientists, engineers, and technical professionals within MITRE.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pressure on pricing.
- Cost No Fee contract type places financial risk on the government.
- Lack of transparency in sole-source justifications can obscure true necessity.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to specialized nature of services.
- Long-term reliance on a single provider may stifle innovation from other sources.
Positive Signals
- MITRE's established expertise in national security and engineering is a significant positive.
- Sole-source award may be justified if MITRE possesses unique, indispensable capabilities.
- Long-term contract indicates a stable, ongoing requirement for critical services.
- Focus on specialized technical services suggests alignment with advanced defense needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically focusing on engineering and national security applications. This sector is characterized by high demand for specialized expertise, often involving research and development, systems integration, and advanced technical consulting. The market size for such services supporting defense is substantial, with significant government spending allocated annually. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the specialized nature and sole-source award, but overall federal spending on engineering and R&D services runs into billions of dollars.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to include a small business set-aside (SS is false, SB is false). The sole-source nature of the award further suggests that the primary focus was on securing specialized capabilities from a specific entity, rather than distributing work among smaller businesses. While MITRE may engage subcontractors, the primary award mechanism does not prioritize small business participation. This could limit opportunities for small businesses to contribute to these critical national security engineering efforts.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside within the Department of the Air Force's contracting and program management offices. As a Cost No Fee contract, rigorous financial oversight is crucial to ensure that costs incurred by MITRE are reasonable and allowable. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Research and Development Contracts
- Air Force Systems Engineering Support
- National Security Technology Development
- Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs)
- Advanced Technology Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks competitive justification.
- Cost-plus contract type (CNF) shifts financial risk to government.
- Lack of transparency in sole-source justification.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to specialized services.
Tags
department-of-defense, air-force, sole-source, research-and-development, engineering-services, national-security, cost-no-fee, massachusetts, large-contract, ffrdc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $414.9 million to THE MITRE CORPORATION. MITRE NATIONAL SECURITY ENGINEERING CENTER (NSEC) SERVICES FOR THE AIR FORCE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THE MITRE CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $414.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-10-01. End: 2023-09-30.
What specific national security engineering capabilities does MITRE provide under this contract?
While the contract details are limited, the 'MITRE NATIONAL SECURITY ENGINEERING CENTER (NSEC) SERVICES FOR THE AIR FORCE' designation suggests MITRE provides advanced engineering, research, development, and technical advisory services crucial for the Air Force's national security missions. This likely includes areas such as systems engineering, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence integration, advanced communications, and potentially support for complex weapon systems. MITRE, as a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC), typically operates in a unique role, providing objective analysis and technical solutions to government challenges, often in areas requiring deep technical expertise and a neutral perspective.
Why was this contract awarded on a sole-source basis?
The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis because the Air Force likely determined that The MITRE Corporation was the only responsible source capable of providing the required services. MITRE, operating as an FFRDC, possesses unique expertise, infrastructure, and an established relationship with the government, particularly in areas of national security engineering. Sole-source awards are typically justified under specific circumstances outlined in federal acquisition regulations, such as when only one source possesses the necessary specialized capabilities or when urgency precludes a competitive process. This designation suggests the Air Force deemed MITRE's specific contributions indispensable for this particular requirement.
What are the implications of the Cost No Fee (CNF) contract type for the government?
The Cost No Fee (CNF) contract type means the contractor (MITRE) is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred in performing the contract, but receives no additional fee or profit. This structure is often used for research and development efforts where the final outcome is uncertain or where the contractor is performing a unique government-owned function, like MITRE. For the government, the primary implication is that the financial risk is largely borne by the government, as costs can fluctuate. While there's no fee, the government must ensure rigorous oversight to validate all claimed costs and prevent overruns. This type of contract emphasizes cost control and accountability over profit maximization for the contractor.
How does MITRE's role as an FFRDC influence this contract?
MITRE's designation as a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) is central to this contract. FFRDCs are established to meet specific long-term research and development needs of the government that cannot be effectively met by the private sector alone. They operate in the public interest, providing objective, independent analysis and technical support. This unique status often leads to sole-source awards, as FFRDCs are designed to have a special relationship with their sponsoring agency. The Air Force likely leverages MITRE's FFRDC status to access specialized, unbiased technical expertise critical for national security engineering.
What is the historical spending context for MITRE with the Air Force?
While specific historical spending data for this exact contract is not provided, MITRE has a long-standing relationship with the Department of Defense and the Air Force, often through FFRDC agreements. Federal procurement data typically shows consistent, substantial awards to MITRE across various agencies for research, development, and technical services. The $415 million awarded here over two years represents a significant but not necessarily unprecedented level of investment, reflecting the ongoing need for MITRE's specialized engineering and advisory capabilities within the Air Force's complex operational environment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 202 BURLINGTON RD, BEDFORD, MA, 01730
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $480,312,690
Exercised Options: $480,312,690
Current Obligation: $414,866,328
Actual Outlays: $2,507,799
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 140
Total Subaward Amount: $19,251,464
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-10-01
Current End Date: 2023-09-30
Potential End Date: 2028-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-09
More Contracts from THE Mitre Corporation
- Center for Advanced Aviation Development (caasd) Ffrdc Mitre — $1.7B (Department of Transportation)
- FY25 Task Order 7 - to Provide Systems Engineering Research and Development Services for the Department of Defense (DOD) and Other Federal Government Agencies — $753.9M (Department of Defense)
- FY24 Task Order 6 - Initial Funding and Updating PWS & DD254 — $735.3M (Department of Defense)
- Caasd Must Provide Essential Engineering, Research, and Analysis Capabilities to Support the FAA in the Performance of ITS Mission Through a Systems Approach That Addresses ALL Dimensions (E.G. Political, Operational, Economic, Technical) Required to — $700.5M (Department of Transportation)
- Initial Modification on Task Order 5 Nsec, Ffrdc to Incrementally Fund, Update PWS & DD254 — $687.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)