DoD's $830M MIT-LL Contract for Technical Services: A Deep Dive into Value and Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $830,466,077 ($830.5M)

Contractor: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2014-10-16

End Date: 2020-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,993 days

Daily Burn Rate: $416.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF MIT-LL FY 15 CONTINUATION CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: LEXINGTON, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02421

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $830.5 million to MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF MIT-LL FY 15 CONTINUATION CONTRACT Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $830M awarded to a single entity. 2. Lack of competition raises questions about price discovery and potential overspending. 3. The contract spans a long duration, increasing long-term risk exposure. 4. Services fall under 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services', a broad category.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's 'COST NO FEE' structure, combined with a lack of competition, makes a direct pricing assessment difficult. Without competitive bids, it's hard to determine if the $830M represents fair market value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This significantly limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers as there was no market pressure to offer competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for an $830M contract suggests potential for taxpayer funds to be used inefficiently, as there was no mechanism to ensure the lowest possible price.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential technical services due to the lack of competitive bidding. The long contract duration (2014-2020) means potential inefficiencies could persist for years. The broad service category could obscure specific cost drivers and performance metrics. Reliance on a single provider for such a large sum could pose a risk if performance falters.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' category is broad and often involves specialized expertise. Benchmarking spending in this area is challenging without more specific service details, but $830M is a substantial investment.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. The sole-source nature likely precluded any opportunities for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'COST NO FEE' structure requires robust oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and allocable. Without competition, the agency's oversight function is critical to prevent potential waste or fraud.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

all-other-professional-scientific-and-te, department-of-defense, ma, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $830.5 million to MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. IGF::CT::IGF MIT-LL FY 15 CONTINUATION CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $830.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-10-16. End: 2020-03-31.

What specific technical services are covered under this broad 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' category, and how were they justified as a sole-source requirement?

The contract details do not specify the exact technical services. Justification for a sole-source award typically requires demonstrating that only one responsible source can provide the required services. This could be due to unique capabilities, proprietary knowledge, or critical research needs that only MIT-LL possesses.

Given the 'COST NO FEE' structure and lack of competition, what mechanisms are in place to ensure the cost-effectiveness and prevent potential overruns or inefficiencies?

The 'COST NO FEE' structure places the financial risk on the government. Robust oversight, detailed cost reporting, and regular audits by the Department of Defense are crucial to monitor expenditures, ensure reasonableness, and prevent inefficiencies. The agency must actively manage the contract to ensure value.

What is the long-term strategy for ensuring continued access to these technical services beyond the contract's expiration, and will future procurements incorporate competitive elements?

The long-term strategy is not detailed in the provided data. Future procurements should ideally incorporate competitive elements to ensure fair pricing and encourage innovation, unless a continued sole-source justification can be rigorously defended. Planning for competition post-expiration is vital for taxpayer value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesOther Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesAll Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 244 WOOD ST, LEXINGTON, MA, 02421

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,564,982,160

Exercised Options: $830,466,077

Current Obligation: $830,466,077

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2014-10-16

Current End Date: 2020-03-31

Potential End Date: 2020-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-06-04

More Contracts from Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View all Massachusetts Institute of Technology federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending