Air Force awards $33.8M contract for engineering services to Credence Management Solutions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $33,781,794 ($33.8M)

Contractor: Credence Management Solutions Limited Liability Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-11-04

End Date: 2021-11-30

Contract Duration: 1,852 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF SCAT I EPASS AFIT

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $33.8 million to CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF SCAT I EPASS AFIT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Credence Management Solutions for $33.8M. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. 3. Contract duration is 1852 days. 4. The contract is for engineering services (NAICS 541330). 5. The award was a delivery order under a larger contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The awarded amount is substantial, and the pricing effectiveness depends on the specific services rendered and the fixed fee negotiated.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The competition was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', indicating a limited competitive environment. This method may not yield the best price discovery compared to unrestricted full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for engineering services. The effectiveness of competition and cost control will determine the overall value for taxpayers.

Public Impact

Supports Department of the Air Force operations through engineering services. Contract duration spans over 5 years, indicating a long-term need. The specific nature of engineering services impacts various Air Force programs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under engineering services, a critical sector for government operations. Benchmarks for similar engineering service contracts vary widely based on scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (SB: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or subcontracted.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically involve contract performance monitoring by the Department of the Air Force to ensure services meet requirements and costs remain controlled.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, oh, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $33.8 million to CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. IGF::CL::IGF SCAT I EPASS AFIT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $33.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-11-04. End: 2021-11-30.

What specific engineering services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with Air Force strategic goals?

The contract specifies engineering services under NAICS code 541330. While the exact services are not detailed in the provided data, they likely encompass design, analysis, testing, and technical support for Air Force systems and infrastructure. Alignment with strategic goals would depend on the specific projects undertaken, such as modernization, maintenance, or development of new capabilities.

What was the rationale for using 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' instead of unrestricted full and open competition?

This competition method suggests that while the opportunity was open, certain sources were excluded, possibly due to specific qualifications, existing relationships, or prior performance requirements. The rationale would need to be documented by the agency to ensure fair and transparent procurement practices, and to justify why a broader competition was not feasible or advantageous.

How effectively was the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure managed to ensure value for money given the 1852-day duration?

Assessing the effectiveness of the CPFF structure requires reviewing performance reports, cost audits, and final contract value against the initial estimate. Without this detailed performance data, it's difficult to determine if the fixed fee adequately incentivized efficiency or if costs escalated beyond expectations. The long duration necessitates robust oversight to manage potential cost creep.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8609 WESTWOOD CTR DR STE 300, VIENNA, VA, 22182

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $45,873,399

Exercised Options: $39,938,499

Current Obligation: $33,781,794

Actual Outlays: $4,366,921

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $2,336,306

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADS112

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2016-11-04

Current End Date: 2021-11-30

Potential End Date: 2021-11-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-04-26

More Contracts from Credence Management Solutions Limited Liability Company

View all Credence Management Solutions Limited Liability Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending