DoD's $65.5M Air National Guard Training System Contract Awarded to HII Mission Technologies Corp
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $65,484,302 ($65.5M)
Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2020-05-01
End Date: 2025-04-30
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: AIR NATIONAL GUARD TRAINING SYSTEM
Place of Performance
Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $65.5 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: AIR NATIONAL GUARD TRAINING SYSTEM Key points: 1. Contract value of $65.5M for training systems. 2. HII Mission Technologies Corp. is the sole awardee. 3. Potential risks include vendor lock-in and limited competition. 4. Spending falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts' manufacturing sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $65.5M appears reasonable for a multi-year training system, but without specific benchmarks for similar systems, a definitive assessment is difficult. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the specific award mechanism (delivery order) and the single awardee raise questions about the extent of price discovery achieved.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential training systems, with the expectation of value for money through competition.
Public Impact
Ensures readiness for Air National Guard personnel through advanced training. Supports the defense industrial base by contracting with HII Mission Technologies Corp. Potential for technological advancements in military training methodologies.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited number of awardees for a significant contract.
- Potential for cost overruns if scope creeps.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical training systems.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract helps manage costs.
- Full and open competition initially sought.
- Contract supports critical national defense training needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector, which is a critical component of the aerospace and defense industry. Spending benchmarks for specialized training systems can vary widely based on complexity and technology.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not directly involved in this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if HII Mission Technologies Corp. is subcontracting to small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is crucial to ensure the training system meets performance requirements and that costs remain within the contracted amount. The Department of the Air Force is responsible for monitoring contract performance.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in.
- Limited visibility into small business participation.
- Risk of scope creep impacting final cost.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical training.
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $65.5 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AIR NATIONAL GUARD TRAINING SYSTEM
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $65.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-05-01. End: 2025-04-30.
What is the specific performance metric for the training system, and how is it being measured to ensure effectiveness?
The effectiveness of the training system is typically measured against predefined performance metrics outlined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW). These metrics often include training completion rates, skill proficiency improvements, and user feedback. Regular performance reviews and milestone assessments by the Air Force contracting officer and technical representatives are essential to ensure the system meets its intended objectives and delivers value for the investment.
Given the single award, what mechanisms are in place to prevent vendor lock-in and ensure future competition for upgrades or replacements?
To mitigate vendor lock-in, the contract should include provisions for data rights, intellectual property, and interoperability standards. This allows the government to potentially transition to a different vendor or develop in-house capabilities for future upgrades or replacements. The contracting agency should also plan for future procurements well in advance, potentially breaking down the system into smaller components to encourage broader competition.
How does the $65.5M cost compare to industry benchmarks for similar advanced military training systems, considering the technology and duration?
A precise cost comparison is challenging without detailed technical specifications and market research data for comparable systems. However, $65.5M over five years for a complex training system suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking would require analyzing the system's fidelity, simulation capabilities, and the number of users it supports against other government or commercial training solutions to determine if the price is competitive.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc
Address: 8350 BROAD ST STE 1400, MC LEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $65,633,524
Exercised Options: $65,630,986
Current Obligation: $65,484,302
Actual Outlays: $14,290,795
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 16
Total Subaward Amount: $49,311,913
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA862115D6268
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-05-01
Current End Date: 2025-04-30
Potential End Date: 2025-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-23
More Contracts from HII Mission Technologies Corp
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca18f0067 IS Hereby Awarded to Alion Science and Technology Corporation to Provide Contractor Support to the Joint Capability Embedded Technology Insertion and Integration (jcetii) Remote Sensing Center (RSC) Within the National Capital Region (NCR). the Period of Performance for This to Will BE September 28, 2018 Through September 27, 2023. the Total Value of the to Will BE $769,178,979 — $934.5M (General Services Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Contract Action IS to Transfer the Administration of This Order From GSA Region 1 to GSA Fedsim — $870.8M (General Services Administration)
- Award of Nite Task Order — $816.6M (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Award a Task Order - Joint Network of Engineering and Emerging Operations (jneeo) — $723.3M (General Services Administration)
- Services 01 JAN 09 to 31 DEC 09 — $684.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)